Who?In post 874, Huntress wrote:Yet you were fine with leaving her at L-2 for two days?
Me voting for HS?
Who?In post 874, Huntress wrote:Yet you were fine with leaving her at L-2 for two days?
Pro-town doesn't equal townie, in the same way as anti-town doesn't equal scummy.In post 879, Sobolev Space wrote:And another good reason to lynch HM since we need as many pro-town players as we can get.
@Sobolev Space: Would you hammer if I switched my vote to Hellfire Missile?In post 870, Huntress wrote:What information will HM's flip give us, if it doesn't end the game of course?
Fair enough. My biggest worry is that Howard is scum and is pushing a ThinkBig lynch today so the thread dies tomorrow and we all end up deciding on an HM lynch for him to win in lylo.In post 882, Huntress wrote:Pro-town doesn't equal townie, in the same way as anti-town doesn't equal scummy.In post 879, Sobolev Space wrote:And another good reason to lynch HM since we need as many pro-town players as we can get.
I would wait at least 72 hours for HM to defend himself and for us to finalize discussion (especially for Huntress to get her last say since she's likely the NK tonight). After that I would hammer unless HM presented some very very convincing arguments for why I shouldn't.In post 884, HowardRoark wrote:@Sobolev Space: Would you hammer if I switched my vote to Hellfire Missile?
I really didn't like this.In post 884, HowardRoark wrote:So that it isn't forgotten:@Sobolev Space: Would you hammer if I switched my vote to Hellfire Missile?In post 870, Huntress wrote:What information will HM's flip give us, if it doesn't end the game of course?
Yes. That's very much what it does look like. He's afraid of a mislynch slipping out of his hands.In post 885, Sobolev Space wrote:Fair enough. My biggest worry is that Howard is scum and is pushing a ThinkBig lynch today so the thread dies tomorrow and we all end up deciding on an HM lynch for him to win in lylo.
I'm still in two minds about him.In post 885, Sobolev Space wrote:@Huntress: are you still leaning towards ThinkBig being scum?
It will narrow down the pool of suspects. I'm confident that either Howard is scum or HM is scum. I'm quite comfortable lynching either one today. HM has acted quite anti-town throughout this game; however, as you pointed out, anti-town=/=scum. If we ML, I'd rather it be an anti-town player.In post 870, Huntress wrote:What information will HM's flip give us, if it doesn't end the game of course?
Can you explain these two lines?In post 890, HowardRoark wrote:The point of my question to you was an attempt at a sanity check for my read of you.
...
@Huntress: I appreciate that you didn't like my post. I also appreciate that Sobolev Space was able to answer it before anyone else chimed in.
Not really. I didn't see anything that stood out as scummy, but the first part of 884 pinged me.In post 889, Sobolev Space wrote:@Huntress: Were you suspicious of Howard before the last couple of posts? If so why?
It's still good to wait before hammering, particularly as we'll be going into lylo if it's a mislynch.In post 889, Sobolev Space wrote:Since this is L-1 should Howard claim and everything or naw? I mean I'm assuming we're all VTs (except the remaining scum) so I guess claiming isn't that important... Unsure about norms here.
I was expecting a little more than just that it would narrow down the list. Almost any lynch would do that. But if he's town with only two suspects I can see his point.In post 890, HowardRoark wrote:What are your thoughts on the answer? I'm not moved.
Differently from what? I'm not sure what you mean here.In post 890, HowardRoark wrote:I'm not sure how you feel differently about Sobolev Space's 889 regarding me.
It's gut mainly. With a bit of throwing a pebble into the water to see the ripples.In post 890, HowardRoark wrote: Can you please boil down you reason to vote me? Why me over ThinkBig?
You've made a couple ominous sounding statements about your question to me in post 884. Could you please explain these a bit more? I asked about this in post 891 as well and still have no response. How did my answer to your question affect your read of me?In post 895, HowardRoark wrote:It was nice that nobody else answered for you and that Huntress appears to be doing some scum hunting, though I obviously disagree with her vote on me.
The thread had had a total on 2 posts from the same person in a 24 hour period when I gave intent. I assumed that most people were done with discussion for the day so resigned myself to what I saw as the best lynch in that scenario (even though I mentioned I would still prefer an HM lynch), and hoped a little that my intent to hammer might cause some activity. It appears that now you and ThinkBig are more active, so hopefully we can still get an HM lynch, or at least more content in the thread.In post 895, HowardRoark wrote:You've called for a Hellfire Missile lynch several times today (807, 851, 872 with not wanting to lynchJoshzThinkBig, 879, 885 with Hellfire Missile mislynch tomorrow, 889) but are now ready to hammer ThinkBig. Why the intent versus asking/pushing me to change to Hellfire Missile?