In post 382, BTD6_maker wrote:Anyway, I would rather not join the Spade Ace wagon, as both Spade Ace and Vedith are nullish.
This to me comes off as really safe and passive. Dunno why I don't like it. I know they may not exactly be SRs to you, but wouldn't a wagon on Spade help you give a better read on him?
In post 332, Spade_Ace wrote:VOTE: Vedith
Consider it an OMGUS, if you will. Cos you literally suck. This is no longer the RVS stage and we have already lost a PR, yet you resort to baseless accusations. Twice in the game I asked you, your reasons for suspecting me and all you could muster was 'you are scummy'. Screaming 'Spade is a scum' 100 times from the rooftop doesn't get my role converted to a scum. If you have a case present it.
In post 387, KainTepes wrote:you OMGUS in that thats the meaning that you vote VEDITH EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE NOT SEEING HIM AS THE SCUMS..................... and then AFTER WARD EVEN THOUGH YOU TOWN READ HIM YOU IGNORE HIM............ TOWN DO NOT IGNORE TOWN,, only SCUM IGNORE TOWN.........
scum DETECTED,,
I AM KAIN TEPES
This is a clear misrepresentation as you can see. The 'ignore' statement was in reply to the 'no one cares' I meant am gonna try and ignore his 'insults' if that wasnt clear for you. If i wanted to ignore him completely i wouldn't have responded to his qs.
If you are going to make a case on me at least do a proper ISO. I have already explained the exact same thing to Kain.
And Vedith was the one who was not answering my questions. I replied to his question on Pine and gave my reads. Go check.
This is what makes me certain you are scum. If you were a town player who got replaced, you would have formed your own opinions. Instead you resort to exactly what your predecessor was saying, thinking that is the safe option. You vote without giving reasons. When forced to give a reason, you respond with something that has already been answered. This shows that you haven't even read the thread.
In post 399, Spade_Ace wrote:@BTD i don't agree with your reason for voting misa. Misa vote was the 'hammer' based on the rules of the game. Based on your reasoning am the one you should be voting against as mine was the vote before the hammer. But i gave my reasons for voting. I had no way of knowing misa and milkshake would join the wagon just few hours before deadline. If i was scum wouldn't it have been easier to join the kop wagon?
You had no way of knowing Misa and Milkshake would contribute, but Misa knew it would be a likely deadline lynch and voted. Thus, while you look bad (a deadline lynch is likely and you may have other reasons for not joining Kop) I find Misa worse. Also, Misa brought the wagon to L-1, not hammer. I don't really understand what you are trying to say in this post. Can you please clarify?
"one of these days i'll read you correctly" - Transcend, Micro 714
What I was trying to say was Misa vote though technically not a hammer ensured that Arnold was getting lynched. Cos you don't need a hammer to lynch a person. The person with max votes is lynched when the deadline expires. So irrespective of Milkshake's final vote Misa's was the decider.
I understand your reasons for suspecting her, but saying she brought it to L-1 hoping that someone else would hammer is wrong. You could say you suspect her cos she changed her vote at the last minute.
OK. I may have misunderstood the deadline lynch rules. Anyway, this actually makes you the worst on that wagon. (Again, you could have had other reasons for not wanting Kop's lynch such as Kop being scum or you wanting to be less suspicious). You are still weak-moderate scum, but from the wagon you are worse than Misa.
VOTE: Spade Ace
"one of these days i'll read you correctly" - Transcend, Micro 714
