oh hell no I'm not waiting for night to lynch this fucker we won't be able to get a wagon on him again it took over ten days to get this one, it's just not going to happen
In post 2851, EchoVision wrote:oh hell no I'm not waiting for night to lynch this fucker we won't be able to get a wagon on him again it took over ten days to get this one, it's just not going to happen
this
gin has a great emotional and charismatic scumgame, but when you pick his posts apart it entirely falls apart
In post 2851, EchoVision wrote:oh hell no I'm not waiting for night to lynch this fucker we won't be able to get a wagon on him again it took over ten days to get this one, it's just not going to happen
this
gin has a great emotional and charismatic scumgame, but when you pick his posts apart it entirely falls apart
NO SHIT BECAUSE WHEN HE'S DEAD I'M FUCKING CONFIRMED
“To be is to do”—Socrates. “To do is to be”—Jean-Paul Sartre. “Do be do be do”—Frank Sinatra.
"Gin, you are so charismatic it's scary." -nancy
not rly tho
you got towns permission to shoot echo before you went for it, and you're pushing this reality so strongly (i'll just confirm myself overnight!) and are so obviously scummy that i'm beginning to truly buy into ginSK or multiball.
would you be a dear and let me know what one it is, because if it's multiball i wanna lynch wraith 2morrow and it'll give me the time to convince everybody else beforehand
<3
In post 2863, Human Sequencer wrote:1. why do you ask?
2. i think echo is towny, i wouldn't bet on it though. i definitely think there's far better targets to shoot, though.
There we go. Build that fuckin town case
“To be is to do”—Socrates. “To do is to be”—Jean-Paul Sartre. “Do be do be do”—Frank Sinatra.
"Gin, you are so charismatic it's scary." -nancy
his catchup spam is town motivated and proves that he's at least putting effort into the game, effort that will become important in the latter days when there's less players and less hyperposting. therefore, the lurker angle is irrelevant.
he's a new player and he's being very frank and transparent with his catchup posts. in this particular instance, i doubt echo would be shrewd enough to fake that as scum.
I'm not talking about his posts quantitatively, I'm talking the qualitative results you get from reading his games but nice dodge of what you know I'm getting at.
“To be is to do”—Socrates. “To do is to be”—Jean-Paul Sartre. “Do be do be do”—Frank Sinatra.
"Gin, you are so charismatic it's scary." -nancy
It's also worth mentioning that trying to form a meta read off of one or two games is bollocks, because it's the time during which you learn the most in the shortest period of time.
burden of proof is on the accuser, not anyone defending a player. . Suggesting otherwise implies that anyone who doesn't get defended is scum, which is really half-assed. It implies you can reasonably use "lack of [x]" as the ONLY justification for a lynch and face no scrutiny. It's a mindset that aids scum.
I'm not surprised that it's being done by Gin at all, I'm a tiny bit surprised it was done by Titus, I would be more surprised that no one really gives a shit this game and is living in an alternate universe but we're deep enough into it that any trace of normalcy has just vanished.
When players are in the noobie stages, it's quite easy to pick out their differences in play because they don't know how to mold their scum game to look like their town game.
In those two games he's played, his post quality has always remained level-headed and he's explained his thoughts in good paragraphs mostly every post.
In this game, he's of an abrasive nature and he mostly avoids giving his opinion in detail as he normally would. In a sense for noob!scums, they generally haven't picked up the skill of forming fake scum reads on players so they'll resort to insults or really weak logic to push their agenda.
If you want an example of why there is a key difference in play I notice, let's look at Echo's ISO, you'll see he said he townread Alisae, and when Alisae asked for Echo's reasoning, multiple times Echo just said it's because he does. It's a bad attempt at buddying and for his previous posting quality that we have seen from him, it would be expected that Echo could actually explain his reads.
“To be is to do”—Socrates. “To do is to be”—Jean-Paul Sartre. “Do be do be do”—Frank Sinatra.
"Gin, you are so charismatic it's scary." -nancy
In post 2804, drealmerz7 wrote:and you all want to let him live, because, hey, it's NOT SCUMMY??
yeah, it is
Who the fuck is "you all", guy? Most people save for me are comfy lynching him, they're just also on other similarly shitty wagons like SD. I was one of the main people defending him. I can't recall much else who did.
I said that to say this. You mean well, but I'm
one of the only people
the only person who understands this about you. Despite our disagreeance in reads I'm quite confident in you being town. You need to adjust your demeanor to that of a cute little kitten. Or a college-age kitten. Your current demeanor is of an ex-convict recovering alcoholic and benzo addict kitten. you're trying to get sober from the kitty benzos and life of cat crime but no one gives a shit about "trying" because human beings are miserable, awful creatures. I don't think people are reading you correctly and I don't agree with the way they react to you, but there's too many people playing hardball, myself included, and you take the top spot. It means yes everyone sucks but a lot of these people that suck share our common interest and when you butt heads with them consistently it makes it much less likely that anything you say will be received well, even if it's 120% right. Which makes things way fucking harder than they need to be.