Open 662: Fire and Ice (Game Over)

[Realeo]

How am I supposed to defend myself if I don't understand what is attacking me.

[Alisae]

Because you're attacking me for doing analysis.

So what should I've done. Not doing anything?

If you attack

the result

of my analysis, (ie. cherry picking, false proof (like Bk did)) fair game. If you attack

the action

of me doing analysis, I'm royally confused.

I am attacking you for attempts to appease people, VCA, and jumping on someone for a NK. Town!Realeo would have atleast attempted NKA on the other kill.

[Realeo]

HOW?

[Realeo]

I did not do NKA.

I did association analysis. I used the NKA to do the association analysis,

NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND

[Alisae]

Realeo the key word is attempt

[Realeo]

You lost me. Sorry.

[Alisae]

if you made the attempt to figure it out the other kill then maybe I couldn't use you jumping on someone for a NK a point.

[Realeo]

No. You don't get the point.

I did not attempt NK analysis at Gamma Emerald.

Go reread the entire case.

[Realeo]

I did association analysis. I used NKA to make association analysis.

Not NKA, but association + NKA.

Two different thing, two different application.

The second relies on a flip.

There is no flip on Fire Mafia.

[Realeo]

And Alisae, you're confused.

NKA is only effective if the NKA target is town.

If the NKA target is scum, then it can be written of as Scum A scumreading Scum B.

How do I trace back scumhunting?

Anyone can scumhunt.

I have done NKA~but the NKA target is town

[Alisae]

I'll drop the NK part.

[Realeo]

I kinda don't wanna argue semantics, but kinda feel like you were trying to shrug off Alisae's thought.

It's more to "

Your point is?

"

When I saw the votecount is 1.1, I'm not sure what Alisae trying to reach.

I mean, there's a doc, a town, a scum, and 2 more alive player in that wagon.

Your conclusion?

And either no fire scum or at least one of not mafia / havingfitz is fire.

It's actually a pretty interesting vote count.

This is lazy and a scum slip.

Lazy : Anyone can do that

Scumslip : Why I am not considered as a correct Fire Mafia wagon? Because KMD knows I don't

[Realeo]

I am attacking you for attempts to appease people,

Elaborate on the appease part. What is appease and what is fulfilling concern. Last time, someone scumread me for not appeasing *cough* Kuroi *cough*.

[Not_Mafia]

I agree with Alisae completely, Realeo/Not_Mafia are clear scumfucks

[Realeo]

Thank you. So you are townreading me now?

[Not_Mafia]

No?

[Realeo]

So why the sarcasm?

[Not_Mafia]

Who said I was being sarcastic?

[Realeo]

VOTE: Not_Mafia

Say again?

[Not_Mafia]

again?

[Alisae]

I am attacking you for attempts to appease people,

Elaborate on the appease part. What is appease and what is fulfilling concern. Last time, someone scumread me for not appeasing *cough* Kuroi *cough*.

Am I Kuroi? No, I'm not. I'm Alisae, not Kuroi.
Scum want to appease.

[Not_Mafia]

You sure changed your read quickly

[Realeo]

You sure changed your read quickly

Because the only reason I townread you is that vc request, which is a meta argument.

[Not_Mafia]

That's a very flimsy reason for a read

[Realeo]

I am attacking you for attempts to appease people,

Elaborate on the appease part. What is appease and what is fulfilling concern. Last time, someone scumread me for not appeasing *cough* Kuroi *cough*.

Am I Kuroi? No, I'm not. I'm Alisae, not Kuroi.
Scum want to appease.

No. I'm just being ironic.

So if someone has concern, I may not address it?