~laundry~ FIN

Fro99er · Post Post #550 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:35 pm

But this will be a fun wagon on me to catch the real scumz

Tammy · Post Post #551 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:35 pm

And seriously if this is your town game, you do not get to rub your scummy in anyone's face again.

Having one good game and then pulling this shit is not brag worthy.

Tammy · Post Post #552 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:36 pm

In post 549, Fro99er wrote:
In post 548, Tammy wrote:I'm sorry you're not town.
I'm sorry you're either wrong or scum.

Probably scum.

Calling me scum will not make it true.

Fro99er · Post Post #553 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:37 pm

In post 551, Tammy wrote:And seriously if this is your town game, you do not get to rub your scummy in anyone's face again.

Having one good game and then pulling this shit is not brag worthy.

OH WAHHH I MIGHT CRY

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #554 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:37 pm

In post 544, Fro99er wrote:
In post 537, Tammy wrote:There is something seriously wrong with Frogger here.
After this game you'll be 1/3 in reading me.
I guess MAFIACEPTION was the ex...ception.

this was a good sentence.
I think it would be a huge boon to all parties involved if you two tried to explain your reads on each other a tiny bit better.

Firebringer · Post Post #555 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:37 pm

In post 551, Tammy wrote:And seriously if this is your town game, you do not get to rub your scummy in anyone's face again.

Having one good game and then pulling this shit is not brag worthy.

people rub their scummiest in peoples face?
lol thats kind of funny

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #556 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:38 pm

In post 540, Tammy wrote:NO U.

I'm as town as they come. I'm sorry your break made you rusty as fuck, but hey guess what you're not getting me lynched and you want to battle me you better bring the big fucking guns.

I'll dance.

^ This post strongest vibe btw I've gotten of town-Tammy.

Fro99er · Post Post #557 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:38 pm

In post 554, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 544, Fro99er wrote:
In post 537, Tammy wrote:There is something seriously wrong with Frogger here.
After this game you'll be 1/3 in reading me.
I guess MAFIACEPTION was the ex...ception.
this was a good sentence.
I think it would be a huge boon to all parties involved if you two tried to explain your reads on each other a tiny bit better.

I didn't like Tammy's stance on SAD at all, especially as SAD was under pressure.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #558 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:38 pm

no offense to either of you since I love you both but
"you're scum"
"no you're scum"
is an actual thing that happened here and all people who just chucked fuel on the fire and walked away should be ashamed of themselves

Tammy · Post Post #559 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:39 pm

Wow so sorry I was looking forward to playing you. You were enjoyable at one time.

I prefer to think it's just because you're scum.

He's scum for advocating a quick lynch on Arthur less than 24 hours into the game for shaky as shit reasons and because it would be funny to see my reaction.

That's a real thing that happened.

Fro99er · Post Post #560 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:39 pm

although I still want to lynch SAD and just figure out if I'm wrong on Tammy later.

VOTE: SAD

Desperado · Post Post #561 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:39 pm

I'm still here.

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #562 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:39 pm

In post 557, Fro99er wrote:
In post 554, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 544, Fro99er wrote:
In post 537, Tammy wrote:There is something seriously wrong with Frogger here.
After this game you'll be 1/3 in reading me.
I guess MAFIACEPTION was the ex...ception.
this was a good sentence.
I think it would be a huge boon to all parties involved if you two tried to explain your reads on each other a tiny bit better.
I didn't like Tammy's stance on SAD at all, especially as SAD was under pressure.

Because she can read me better than everyone else here combined with prob the only other being close is Maria?

MariaR · Post Post #563 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:40 pm

You mean I was right on my townread that no one listened too :O

SHOCKING

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #564 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:40 pm

In post 557, Fro99er wrote:I didn't like Tammy's stance on SAD at all, especially as SAD was under pressure.

I have not yet read the game and am trying not to get absorbed in it yet. Would you mind elaborating a bit? Why didn't you like her stance/why do you think it was coming from scum/why was this pressure important (especially considering it was happening so early)?

Fro99er · Post Post #565 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:40 pm

In post 560, Fro99er wrote:although I still want to lynch SAD and just figure out if I'm wrong on Tammy later.

VOTE: SAD

TBF I do think a town!Tammy and I can actually work together, and I'm starting to feel like this could be a TvT.

I don't care if she still scum reads me for "can't take the heat I'm backing off" ... it is what it is.

Firebringer · Post Post #566 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:41 pm

In post 559, Tammy wrote:Wow so sorry I was looking forward to playing you. You were enjoyable at one time.

Such a low blow. Shots fired.
Send out the burn unit.

Fro99er · Post Post #567 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:43 pm

In post 566, Firebringer wrote:
In post 559, Tammy wrote:Wow so sorry I was looking forward to playing you. You were enjoyable at one time.
Such a low blow. Shots fired.
Send out the burn unit.

I need some moist..ure to help me.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #568 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:43 pm

In post 559, Tammy wrote:He's scum for advocating a quick lynch on Arthur less than 24 hours into the game for shaky as shit reasons and because it would be funny to see my reaction.That's a real thing that happened.

You think that he was seriously endorsing a quicklynch?

Tammy · Post Post #569 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:43 pm

Did you even read or interact with my stance on Arthur. Cause I think I made it pretty fucking clear that I'm pretty good at reading him and was engaging people's read on him.

But no, let's just ignore that and not interact with me pointing out that he gets lynched for these dumb reasons over and over and over again and advocate for his quick lynch before one whole day is up.

That just seems like the most pro-town thing to do.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #570 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:44 pm

digging for reactions is something that lots of people do

Tammy · Post Post #571 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:44 pm

In post 568, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 559, Tammy wrote:He's scum for advocating a quick lynch on Arthur less than 24 hours into the game for shaky as shit reasons and because it would be funny to see my reaction.That's a real thing that happened.
You think that he was seriously endorsing a quicklynch?

yes he was Arthur was at L-1 that's a serious thing that happened as he was calling for more votes and a hammer.

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #572 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:44 pm

In post 565, Fro99er wrote:
In post 560, Fro99er wrote:although I still want to lynch SAD and just figure out if I'm wrong on Tammy later.

VOTE: SAD
TBF I do think a town!Tammy and I can actually work together, and I'm starting to feel like this could be a TvT.

I don't care if she still scum reads me for "can't take the heat I'm backing off" ... it is what it is.

LOL

Gonna try to just ignore the fact you were just advocating a quick lynch on me

while still not answering specially why you have a scumread on me

while saying you have been explaining it all game while your ISO shows that you have ZERO explanation of your scumread on me.

You're a spineless pale pathetic lot
and you haven't got a clue
somehow I'll make a man out of you.

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #573 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:44 pm

In post 568, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 559, Tammy wrote:He's scum for advocating a quick lynch on Arthur less than 24 hours into the game for shaky as shit reasons and because it would be funny to see my reaction.That's a real thing that happened.
You think that he was seriously endorsing a quicklynch?

P sure yes.

Fro99er · Post Post #574 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:45 pm

In post 564, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 557, Fro99er wrote:I didn't like Tammy's stance on SAD at all, especially as SAD was under pressure.
I have not yet read the game and am trying not to get absorbed in it yet. Would you mind elaborating a bit? Why didn't you like her stance/why do you think it was coming from scum/why was this pressure important (especially considering it was happening so early)?

I felt like she was discrediting any possible scum read on Arthur except her own reason, yet still couldn't take a stance on him one way or the other. It's fine if they need to dance, but her reaction to every time someone gave a read for SAD felt like she was trying to discredit their reasons. And I could see scum doing that whether SAD was town (town points for diffusing a town lynch) or scum (if SAD was her buddy)

I feel like a town!Tammy would have been more receptive to other people's reasons.