In post 1588, Creature wrote:Hey Cassielle, what's your opinion on this?
In post 494, Shade wrote:I can't catch up and post more than this tonight because I'm really busy with a sudden real life issue, and the fact this game has so many new posts is not helping.
@Aeronaut Please don't replace me from the game! I will promised try to be more active.
Just answering to a post I read last night
@gigabyteTroubadour I was suspecting gayreen as scum. That was the main reason I asked questions about your reads cause your read about gayreen felt really weird to me. I don't suspect him as scum with TB necessarily, not sure why you were expecting me to scum read them as a team. The way he kept his vote around as a threat and got confused after TB claim is actually scummy to me but first thing that came to my mind was the way he was asking for permissions to vote [like asking help from a more talented player] and I voted ThinkGig mainly to see what will you and GAYreenHamster do about it (and to actually remind ThinkBig to answer my question) which was disrupted with this wagon on me.
As I think it won't have the effect I wanted anymore
UNVOTE: ThinkBig
I will answer anything else which was asked from me later when I have time to fully catch up and comment about stuff and will sort my reads.
Sorry for this, Have a good night
it scans
he was having trouble contributing (though his contributions were scheduled and regular) and he ended up replacing out without continuing any site activity. feels town
the TB vote was arguably scummy but its about as noobtown as it is noobscum -- he missed rvs and wanted to play, lol -- and so the unvote makes sense from both ends too. in other words, NAI (or so slightly AI that basing any read on it is really suspect)
also remember mbg's argument for rc being scum relied on shade being scum because he replaced out when schadd_ was under fire. but this implies he was crumbling when TB was under fire and TB IS CONFTOWN
so this argument against shade doesnt track, the slot looks good