THEN WHY ARE YOU ARGUING SOMETHING THAT HASIn post 4599, Fro99er wrote:I never said it's convenient. If you were neighborized with no CC, then of course you're telling the truth. Doesn't make you town though.In post 4597, gerryoat wrote:how is thatIn post 4594, Fro99er wrote:Un CC'd doesn't make you not scum. You could still be scum of either alignment.In post 4587, gerryoat wrote:I'm literally uncc'd. How is it convenient????convenient.
I didn't answer for mick. I made a different point. I'm not talking about mick's point whatsoever.In post 4602, gerryoat wrote:I NEVER SAID IT MADE ME TOWN. I ASKED IF IT WAS CONVENIENT. AGAIN. HOW DOES THAT = WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. AND WHY ARE YOU ANSWERING FOR CONMANMICK
In post 4601, Alisae wrote:Why the fuck are you so hyper defensive right now?
WHY ARE YOU BRINGING UP POINTS THAT DON'T MATTER. I NEVER SAID I WAS TOWN BECAUSE OF IT. I'M SAYING THAT HIS REASONING OF IT BEING "CONVENIENT" MAKES NO SENSE. THAT'S COMMON KNOWLEDGE. SO YOU'RE SAYING THINGS TO DEFLECT.In post 4605, Fro99er wrote:I didn't answer for mick. I made a different point. I'm not talking about mick's point whatsoever.In post 4602, gerryoat wrote:I NEVER SAID IT MADE ME TOWN. I ASKED IF IT WAS CONVENIENT. AGAIN. HOW DOES THAT = WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. AND WHY ARE YOU ANSWERING FOR CONMANMICK
I'm saying an un-CC'd neighborizer doesn't matter.
There's a disconnect going on here dude that you're not getting in your rage positng
scumtellIn post 4606, gerryoat wrote:HOW COME YOU DIDNT GRILL FROG FOR BEING DEFENSIVE.
i think this is why cloud tried to neighbor meIn post 3300, gerryoat wrote:not really. you're just acting like your usual self right now but it's been mostly trolling. i do like that you stuck to your guns about the claim, when the easy thing would be just give into the claim, if you're maf. but besides that you're still null rn sryIn post 3297, CloudKicker wrote:i am pretty sure atm i gave enough content to be alignement read buddyIn post 3294, gerryoat wrote:-In post 3284, Clumsy wrote:What are opinions on the following people:
CloudKicker
Pine
PeregrineV
Alisae
Jaack
Transcend
P-edit: Easy. Target has a PT or doesn't. They're either a:
-Mason
-Neighbor
-Mafia
Done.Cloud just subbed in and hasnt read, willing to give him a pass today
- Pine is lynchable
- PV Is a TR, find it weird how he just vanished tho. Also wanna see what cabd is talking about with this scum game comparison thing.
- Prefer not to lynch but, w/e
- Jaaack is lynchable
- Transcend is TR
LOLOLOLIn post 4608, Fro99er wrote:scumtellIn post 4606, gerryoat wrote:HOW COME YOU DIDNT GRILL FROG FOR BEING DEFENSIVE.
"how come you didn't do this to X but you are doing it to me"
In post 4609, Alisae wrote:Cuz you're just going over the top right now. If you're trying to prove that I wouldn't know for sure if you're overeacting or not then fine, you proved that point, but I see no reason for you to be going over the top right now.
You're not handling the fact you're wagon is forming on you well.
pedit: your situations aren't the same. I did gril Frogger for being super defensive yesterday but I settled on a pep lynch. Today a wagon wasn't starting to form on him and your wagon was.
In post 4286, ConManMick wrote:Today I could lynch Transcend, Fro99er, and I had been thinking pine but evidently not. Anywho. Gonna see who Manuel was on cos that nightkill strikes me as off unless someone knew he was a mason.
actually, this guy is mafia. lol.
No, he's a mason.In post 4614, gerryoat wrote:In post 4286, ConManMick wrote:Today I could lynch Transcend, Fro99er, and I had been thinking pine but evidently not. Anywho. Gonna see who Manuel was on cos that nightkill strikes me as off unless someone knew he was a mason.actually, this guy is mafia. lol.
you're really bad at thisIn post 4614, gerryoat wrote:In post 4286, ConManMick wrote:Today I could lynch Transcend, Fro99er, and I had been thinking pine but evidently not. Anywho. Gonna see who Manuel was on cos that nightkill strikes me as off unless someone knew he was a mason.actually, this guy is mafia. lol.
Yes I admit it.In post 4612, gerryoat wrote:In post 4609, Alisae wrote:Cuz you're just going over the top right now. If you're trying to prove that I wouldn't know for sure if you're overeacting or not then fine, you proved that point, but I see no reason for you to be going over the top right now.
You're not handling the fact you're wagon is forming on you well.
pedit: your situations aren't the same. I did gril Frogger for being super defensive yesterday but I settled on a pep lynch. Today a wagon wasn't starting to form on him and your wagon was.
SO you admit that you wouldn't know if i was overreacting or not? Also, that's a lie, there were people questioning frog and you went to other situations. when the end of the day you were voting frog.
but you scumread frogger and were willing to lynch him until the pep mislynch was thereIn post 4618, Alisae wrote:Yes I admit it.In post 4612, gerryoat wrote:In post 4609, Alisae wrote:Cuz you're just going over the top right now. If you're trying to prove that I wouldn't know for sure if you're overeacting or not then fine, you proved that point, but I see no reason for you to be going over the top right now.
You're not handling the fact you're wagon is forming on you well.
pedit: your situations aren't the same. I did gril Frogger for being super defensive yesterday but I settled on a pep lynch. Today a wagon wasn't starting to form on him and your wagon was.
SO you admit that you wouldn't know if i was overreacting or not? Also, that's a lie, there were people questioning frog and you went to other situations. when the end of the day you were voting frog.
I voteparked Cloudie D1. I'm talking about Day 1. Not today. I didn't gril Frogger about being defensive today.
I voted Pep at the end of D1, not Frogger.
There can be three masons sherlockIn post 4619, gerryoat wrote:How is he a mason? Clumsy is the mason claim and the other mason died?
you are under the wrong assumptionIn post 4622, gerryoat wrote:I was under the impression Mason was like templars on EM. There are only 2
