Accountant's Utopia Philosophy
-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
Good is not +, Bad is not -
Good is good, Bad is bad, + and - indicate a lot and none
+Good = lots of good
-Good = no good
+- = a lot of null, no null = null = balanced
GoodBad = some good, some bad = balanced
+GoodBad = A lot of good, some bad = not balanced
-Good+Bad = No good, a lot of bad = balanced
+Good-Bad = A lot of good, no bad = utopia = balanced
This is not gish galloping, gish galloping is when you throw hundreds of nonsensical arguments, I am showing you exactly why I am correct and you can't justify your own incorrect view so you are resorting to evidenceless assertions and baselss accusations to try to dishonestly discredit meThere's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
Honestly you're an idiot if you think you know better than me what the correct path's definition of balance is, given that you don't even accept the most basic tenets of the path and I am a dedicated scholar of the correct pathThere's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
eagerSnake Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: May 29, 2016
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_GallopIn post 1724, Shaziro wrote:gish galloping
Also relevant: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Trump-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
Maybe it appears as though I am drowning him in arguments because he can't believe that a single one of my arguments is powerful enough to drown him by itselfThere's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Shaziro Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: April 20, 2016
- Location: Doggoland
You literally take pride in the irrationality of your arguments, saying that you don't have to be rational because you're special. That's a pretty shit argument there bud. Also, no, + does not mean lots, - does not mean none. A lot of water is not a balanced amount of water.In post 1725, Accountant wrote:Good is not +, Bad is not -
Good is good, Bad is bad, + and - indicate a lot and none
+Good = lots of good
-Good = no good
+- = a lot of null, no null = null = balanced
GoodBad = some good, some bad = balanced
+GoodBad = A lot of good, some bad = not balanced
-Good+Bad = No good, a lot of bad = balanced
+Good-Bad = A lot of good, no bad = utopia = balanced
This is not gish galloping, gish galloping is when you throw hundreds of nonsensical arguments, I am showing you exactly why I am correct and you can't justify your own incorrect view so you are resorting to evidenceless assertions and baselss accusations to try to dishonestly discredit me
You are talking in the real world, not your bullshit fantasy world. That's why you're using a real world language, not some bullshit fantasy language. Therefore, if you're using words from a real language, you have to go by their real meaning, not a meaning you think is better.In post 1726, Accountant wrote:Honestly you're an idiot if you think you know better than me what the correct path's definition of balance is, given that you don't even accept the most basic tenets of the path and I am a dedicated scholar of the correct path
My point exactly. Accountant is effectively as bad as Trump in many areas.In post 1727, eagerSnake wrote:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_GallopIn post 1724, Shaziro wrote:gish galloping
Also relevant: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Trump-
-
Shaziro Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: April 20, 2016
- Location: Doggoland
Your arguments are as shallow as you and your thought processes. That is to say, -very- shallow.In post 1728, Accountant wrote:Maybe it appears as though I am drowning him in arguments because he can't believe that a single one of my arguments is powerful enough to drown him by itself-
-
eagerSnake Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: May 29, 2016
-
-
Sesq Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: November 21, 2016
I've chat with them before. I understand their ideology a bit better, or at least some of the roots.In post 1731, eagerSnake wrote:I propose moving to a medium where one would not have time to 'prepare' responses-
-
Shaziro Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: April 20, 2016
- Location: Doggoland
What would that achieve?In post 1731, eagerSnake wrote:I propose moving to a medium where one would not have time to 'prepare' responses-
-
eagerSnake Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: May 29, 2016
-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
A lot of water is not a balanced amount of water, but if you take a lot of water and mix it with none of anti-water, you have a balanced amount of total liquid. Also, I do not take pride in the irrationality of my arguments. I simply point out, as a hard, solid fact(no matter how much you may wish to deny it), that my arguments are above rationality.In post 1729, Shaziro wrote:You literally take pride in the irrationality of your arguments, saying that you don't have to be rational because you're special. That's a pretty shit argument there bud. Also, no, + does not mean lots, - does not mean none. A lot of water is not a balanced amount of water.There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
I do not talk in the real world. I never talk in the real world, and I never have since I established the Wonderland. It's a testament to your short-sightedness that you're unable to conceive of anyone talking in a world you aren't in yourself.In post 1729, Shaziro wrote:You are talking in the real world, not your bullshit fantasy world. That's why you're using a real world language, not some bullshit fantasy language. Therefore, if you're using words from a real language, you have to go by their real meaning, not a meaning you think is better.There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
More assertions without evidence.In post 1730, Shaziro wrote:
Your arguments are as shallow as you and your thought processes. That is to say, -very- shallow.In post 1728, Accountant wrote:Maybe it appears as though I am drowning him in arguments because he can't believe that a single one of my arguments is powerful enough to drown him by itselfThere's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
Skype: helltank.cyIn post 1731, eagerSnake wrote:I propose moving to a medium where one would not have time to 'prepare' responses
Discord: Aliphant#4694
Telegram:[redacted.]
If you have an IRC server, I can chat there too, since I have an IRC client.Last edited by InflatablePie on Thu Feb 02, 2017 4:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: removed phone #There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Postie Any/allJack of All TradesAny/all
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5009
- Joined: August 10, 2015
- Pronoun: Any/all
-
-
Shaziro Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: April 20, 2016
- Location: Doggoland
I'm a Christian, I can easily conceive of worlds I'm not in and people talking about them. You're no god, though, you're a kid in Singapore with some serious issues that need resolving by somebody interested in helping you rather than poking holes in your ideas because of how annoying you are with them elsewhere on the thread, and who won't get even more annoyed at your attempts at insults and then threats to get them to go away when you realize you're wrong. You've got two options when talking about worlds that are not the ones in which your audience lives in. Explain them in the best possible way using terminology and examples from their world, such as "Land of Milk and Honey", "Paradise", and "Perfect Afterlife"...or just say "I can't explain it, you have to take it on faith". First one works a lot better. You're trying to take words from actual reality and then change them to mean whatever you want, while expecting to keep the full weight (if not more weight than) their real world meaning.In post 1736, Accountant wrote:
I do not talk in the real world. I never talk in the real world, and I never have since I established the Wonderland. It's a testament to your short-sightedness that you're unable to conceive of anyone talking in a world you aren't in yourself.In post 1729, Shaziro wrote:You are talking in the real world, not your bullshit fantasy world. That's why you're using a real world language, not some bullshit fantasy language. Therefore, if you're using words from a real language, you have to go by their real meaning, not a meaning you think is better.-
-
eagerSnake Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3821
- Joined: May 29, 2016
There is no proof or evidence that atheism is accurate and correct. There is no proof or evidence that atheism is accurate and correct. There is no proof or evidence that atheism is accurate and correct. There is no proof or evidence that atheism is accurate and correct. There is no proof or evidence that atheism is accurate and correct.
I was inb4 there is no proof or evidence that Christianity is accurate and correct.-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
I trust you people.In post 1739, Postie wrote:Why would you make your phone number publically available
Assuming that isn't the number to a troll hotlineThere's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Postie Any/allJack of All TradesAny/all
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5009
- Joined: August 10, 2015
- Pronoun: Any/all
-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
Oh, you're a Christian. That explains a lot.In post 1740, Shaziro wrote:I'm a Christian, I can easily conceive of worlds I'm not in and people talking about them. You're no god, though, you're a kid in Singapore with some serious issues that need resolving by somebody interested in helping you rather than poking holes in your ideas because of how annoying you are with them elsewhere on the thread, and who won't get even more annoyed at your attempts at insults and then threats to get them to go away when you realize you're wrong. You've got two options when talking about worlds that are not the ones in which your audience lives in. Explain them in the best possible way using terminology and examples from their world, such as "Land of Milk and Honey", "Paradise", and "Perfect Afterlife"...or just say "I can't explain it, you have to take it on faith". First one works a lot better. You're trying to take words from actual reality and then change them to mean whatever you want, while expecting to keep the full weight (if not more weight than) their real world meaning.
Well, I can conceive of worlds I'm not in, but I don't have an interest in doing anything in those putrid worlds(other than maybe reforming them). I don't want or need to be helped. I have no issues, no matter how much your not-a-psychiatrist-self tells me I do. I have never "realized I am wrong". I assure you this as an objective truth - thus your statement is incorrect. I choose the second option.There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
I trust that the small subsection of non-scummers who just happen to access this particular thread and flip to this particular page are not unscrupulous enough to abuse the information given.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Annadog40 Owl of the Night Chat
- Owl of the Night Chat
- Owl of the Night Chat
- Posts: 786
- Joined: May 2, 2015
- Location: Arendelle
Your even more wrong if you are talking in wonderland. Balance is pointless along with good and bad as consepts are done away with.In post 1736, Accountant wrote:I never have since I established the WonderlandThis is my life now
Once you have 100 posts, click here to go to the page to join the speakeasy group.-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
Who told you that?In post 1746, Annadog40 wrote:
Your even more wrong if you are talking in wonderland. Balance is pointless along with good and bad as consepts are done away with.In post 1736, Accountant wrote:I never have since I established the WonderlandThere's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.-
-
Annadog40 Owl of the Night Chat
-
-
Accountant Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6419
- Joined: May 16, 2015
- Location: Wonderland
The books?There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.