There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1729, Shaziro wrote:You literally take pride in the irrationality of your arguments, saying that you don't have to be rational because you're special. That's a pretty shit argument there bud. Also, no, + does not mean lots, - does not mean none. A lot of water is not a balanced amount of water.
A lot of water is not a balanced amount of water, but if you take a lot of water and mix it with none of anti-water, you have a balanced amount of total liquid.
This is officially the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
In post 1740, Shaziro wrote:I'm a Christian, I can easily conceive of worlds I'm not in and people talking about them. You're no god, though, you're a kid in Singapore with some serious issues that need resolving by somebody interested in helping you rather than poking holes in your ideas because of how annoying you are with them elsewhere on the thread, and who won't get even more annoyed at your attempts at insults and then threats to get them to go away when you realize you're wrong. You've got two options when talking about worlds that are not the ones in which your audience lives in. Explain them in the best possible way using terminology and examples from their world, such as "Land of Milk and Honey", "Paradise", and "Perfect Afterlife"...or just say "I can't explain it, you have to take it on faith". First one works a lot better. You're trying to take words from actual reality and then change them to mean whatever you want, while expecting to keep the full weight (if not more weight than) their real world meaning.
Oh, you're a Christian. That explains a lot.
Well, I can conceive of worlds I'm not in, but I don't have an interest in doing anything in those putrid worlds(other than maybe reforming them). I don't want or need to be helped. I have no issues, no matter how much your not-a-psychiatrist-self tells me I do. I have never "realized I am wrong". I assure you this as an objective truth - thus your statement is incorrect. I choose the second option.
You have more religious dogmatism than someone who's actually religious lol
What you're expecting acc not to be condescendingly jerkish?
Anyway, I find your capitalization of "Wonderland" to be interesting, as if it's a real place you've established, even though you kind of imply it's this weird alternate dimension thing that's in your head.
But if this is some sort of hidden ironic joke, I'd be joyful.
A state of things that achieves a pleasant symmetry.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
It's not an insult. I merely said it explained a lot about Shaziro's behavior.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1756, Sesq wrote:This is officially the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
Ever.
I literally mean it.
This is not an argument.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1756, Sesq wrote:Anyway, I find your capitalization of "Wonderland" to be interesting, as if it's a real place you've established, even though you kind of imply it's this weird alternate dimension thing that's in your head.
But if this is some sort of hidden ironic joke, I'd be joyful.
When will people learn that the two are not mutually exclusive? Well, I'm certainly not a comedian.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1756, Sesq wrote:It's already defined as "whatever I want it to be because I've already applied this buzzword haphazardly and can't back out of it"
1757 proves this post to be incorrect.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
A state of things that achieves a pleasant symmetry.
It's too bad none of these words mean anything to us in the real world because you apparently have different definitions for everything in your world than we do here in the real world.
"Pleasant symmetry" and that leaves plenty of room for interpretation even in our language.
In post 1756, Sesq wrote:Anyway, I find your capitalization of "Wonderland" to be interesting, as if it's a real place you've established, even though you kind of imply it's this weird alternate dimension thing that's in your head.
But if this is some sort of hidden ironic joke, I'd be joyful.
When will people learn that the two are not mutually exclusive? Well, I'm certainly not a comedian.
Because they can't be mutually exclusive?
I mean, it's "real" in the sense that it's in the neurons moving around your brain, but it doesn't have any effect on anyone but you. I don't see why you think it's important at all.
In post 1763, eagerSnake wrote:It's too bad none of these words mean anything to us in the real world because you apparently have different definitions for everything in your world than we do here in the real world.
"Pleasant symmetry" and that leaves plenty of room for interpretation even in our language.
Come on, everyone knows what I mean by pleasant symmetry.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1763, eagerSnake wrote:It's too bad none of these words mean anything to us in the real world because you apparently have different definitions for everything in your world than we do here in the real world.
"Pleasant symmetry" and that leaves plenty of room for interpretation even in our language.
Perhaps you should change your definitions to fit mine. After all, we already know that my world is perfect while yours is not.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
My location says "Wonderland". Wonderland means utopia.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1763, eagerSnake wrote:It's too bad none of these words mean anything to us in the real world because you apparently have different definitions for everything in your world than we do here in the real world.
"Pleasant symmetry" and that leaves plenty of room for interpretation even in our language.
Perhaps you should change your definitions to fit mine. After all, we already know that my world is perfect while yours is not.
