If you're here to me to preach about how the world will be destroyed if I tarnish even a single bit of your precious freedoms, I'm not interested in hearing it.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
I advise you to cease the baseless speculation. I have been examined thoroughly by trained mental health professionals and they have found nothing much wrong with me
It's not about what's wrong it's about what's different
you've said you had aspergers which i would consider different but not wrong
In post 1891, Sesq wrote:the recent living in imagination stuff isn't morally bad just kinda pathetic
but earlier on they were wanting to impose an orwellian reality onto everyone and generally just being idiotic about everything
1) You claim it is pathetic because you are short-sighted and cannot see the beauty of utopia. However, I do not blame you for this. You've indicated elsewhere that you're frequently depressed and anxious and have thought about suicide before, so it could be that this casts a cloud of negativity over you and blinds your ability to see utopia for what it truly is - not pathetic, but perfect. The only path.
2) While it's true that my reality is Orwellian, I think that's a good thing.
In post 1902, Sesq wrote:you can't go past things that are literally impossible
It is not literally impossible for me to ignore something because I think it's unsatisfactory.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1902, Sesq wrote:It's not about what's wrong it's about what's different
you've said you had aspergers which i would consider different but not wrong
Your suggestion that I may be schizophrenic is invalidated by the opinions of mental health professionals who have thoroughly determined that I am not schizophrenic.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1902, Sesq wrote:This isn't about my needs it's about base human needs
humans were evolved to be social creatures enough time alone and youll literally go insane
I disagree. Let us determine who is right by trying it out.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1908, Shaziro wrote:It's scientific fact, actually, that isolation causes extreme psychological damage.
Perhaps to those of softer will.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1910, Shaziro wrote:No, it's been tested repeatedly. It's a human thing. You'd go mad from isolation too.
I assure you that I would not. One might say that when I am alone, I am in good company.
(that was a joke)
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1917, rb wrote:im a hyperdimensional alien emissary
What does hyperdimensional even mean?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 1793, Shaziro wrote:No, they are designed to be unfalsifiable. They aren't even particularly well designed for that. I could just as easily claim that you are a 10 pound brick of concrete, and when asked to prove it say that it is self evident. You have no proof for your claims, so they are either false or based in faith like a religion. A shit religion, to be clear.
This is incorrect. I am the world's leading authority on the design of Accountant's arguments
Wrong.
I
am the world's leading authority on the design of Accountant's arguments.
"i have the sickest grossest feeling that even if it's my lynch today, my townflip still won't lead to a tso lynch, and then he'll find some bullshit way to reason either shooting or lynching gm tomorrow because if there's anyone who can strongarm a mislynch despite his reads or cases being proved wrong time and again it's tso"
You cannot just claim things that have no factual basis, such as you having more authority on the design of your arguments than I do.
"i have the sickest grossest feeling that even if it's my lynch today, my townflip still won't lead to a tso lynch, and then he'll find some bullshit way to reason either shooting or lynching gm tomorrow because if there's anyone who can strongarm a mislynch despite his reads or cases being proved wrong time and again it's tso"
