In post 1932, Accountant wrote:I have memories of designing my own arguments. Furthermore, it is my habit to design my own arguments rather than making others design my arguments for me. These two factors corroborate each other - hence, I have designed my own arguments.
No, those are memories I gave you to put you under the illusion that they were your own. Hence, I control you.
These statements are unsupported by evidence. I do not believe you.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
The question is too vague to provide an appropriate answer.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 1932, Accountant wrote:I have memories of designing my own arguments. Furthermore, it is my habit to design my own arguments rather than making others design my arguments for me. These two factors corroborate each other - hence, I have designed my own arguments.
No, those are memories I gave you to put you under the illusion that they were your own. Hence, I control you.
These statements are unsupported by evidence. I do not believe you.
In post 1932, Accountant wrote:I have memories of designing my own arguments. Furthermore, it is my habit to design my own arguments rather than making others design my arguments for me. These two factors corroborate each other - hence, I have designed my own arguments.
No, those are memories I gave you to put you under the illusion that they were your own. Hence, I control you.
These statements are unsupported by evidence. I do not believe you.
Nor is your utopia being a good idea
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
My utopia being a good idea is supported by the assertion of the correct path, which as we all know is the highest source of truth, even trumping evidence. T S O's statements are not.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
TSO's statements are asserted by the perfect path, which is above evidence
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
My utopia being a good idea is supported by the assertion of the correct path, which as we all know is the highest source of truth, even trumping evidence. T S O's statements are not.
In post 1956, Not_Mafia wrote:TSO's statements are asserted by the perfect path, which is above evidence
There is no such thing as the perfect path.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
My utopia being a good idea is supported by the assertion of the correct path, which as we all know is the highest source of truth, even trumping evidence. T S O's statements are not.
You can't be true without evidence though...
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
My utopia being a good idea is supported by the assertion of the correct path, which as we all know is the highest source of truth, even trumping evidence. T S O's statements are not.
You can't be true without evidence though...
No, actually that statement is correct. To clarify what I said previously though, I'd like to hear your thoughts on Confucianism, and how it's basically your ideology but with slight differences and doesn't position you as some godlike figure.
In post 1960, Shaziro wrote:No, actually that statement is correct. To clarify what I said previously though, I'd like to hear your thoughts on Confucianism, and how it's basically your ideology but with slight differences and doesn't position you as some godlike figure.
That statement is incorrect.
Confucianism is an irrelevant ideology because it isn't exactly the same as mine, and is therefore incorrect. While it may be partially correct, it's definitely not fully correct. Who would care about a partially correct ideology when the fully correct one exists?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Oh, and my ideology doesn't position me as some godlike figure. I am just a humble messenger of the correct path. To say that I am God, or that I wrote the correct path - this is truly arrogant. I would never claim that.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Your statements that I am wrong are baseless and therefore incorrect.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There is no way you can prove me a liar. I request that you provide basis for your statements.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
I asked for you to provide basis for your statement that I claimed I was God. What you have provided is not evidence for that, but rather a statement signifying that I am God.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
What I've provided is a copy-paste from a PM you sent me, which I can screenshot and post the picture of if I need to, in which you claim you are God. That's evidence. You, Accountant, are a -liar-. You said:
In post 1962, Accountant wrote:Oh, and my ideology doesn't position me as some godlike figure. I am just a humble messenger of the correct path. To say that I am God, or that I wrote the correct path - this is truly arrogant. I would never claim that.
And yes, I'm quoting it so you can't delete your post to hide it~.
In post 1956, Not_Mafia wrote:TSO's statements are asserted by the perfect path, which is above evidence
There is no such thing as the perfect path.
Yes there is, it is stated by the true path, which is above the correct path
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
In post 1971, Shaziro wrote:What I've provided is a copy-paste from a PM you sent me, which I can screenshot and post the picture of if I need to, in which you claim you are God. That's evidence. You, Accountant, are a -liar-.
No I didn't. I do not deny the veracity of the PM. However, that PM does not show me claiming I am God. There was no such thing as "Accountant claims that they are God" within the PM.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.