The correct path favors righteousness - righteous people are naturally inclined to do what they can to ensure they can uphold the right values, including making sure they don't die from lack of nutrition.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Not necessarily. If you're already very healthy and don't need the nutrients, it's fine to eat tasty foods.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 2444, Shaziro wrote:But doesn't your health change your ability to be productive in some ways? Furthermore, how would you react if I managed to prove that some preference of yours is morally bad?
I don't see what the first has to do with anything. For the second, the correct path order "do not do morally bad things" supersedes the order "do things in accordance to your personal preference", in the same way that a General's order supersedes a Sargeant's(I've used this metaphor many times because it's so applicable to my philosophy).
^ refer to the above; the order of the correct path that "the hierarchy must be followed" supersedes your preference of free speech.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 2456, Shaziro wrote:People who are your superiors have determined I should have Free Speech.
And yet, those people are inferior to the correct path, which has determined that you should not.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 2456, Shaziro wrote:People who are your superiors have determined I should have Free Speech.
And yet, those people are inferior to the correct path, which has determined that you should not.
This is incorrect.
No it's not.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Freedom of speech necessarily entails freedom of bad speech, like racism or sexism. Freedom of food doesn't entail bad things. If there is a food that causes immoral things to happen when eaten, then I will happily take away your freedom of food.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Yes it is. The fact that it is self evident is also self evident.
In post 2467, Accountant wrote:Freedom of speech necessarily entails freedom of bad speech, like racism or sexism. Freedom of food doesn't entail bad things. If there is a food that causes immoral things to happen when eaten, then I will happily take away your freedom of food.
In post 2468, Shaziro wrote:Yes it is. The fact that it is self evident is also self evident.
You are wrong.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Contrary to popular belief, ingesting alcohol does not cause you to turn evil.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
Contrary to popular belief, ingesting alcohol does not cause you to turn evil.
I have relatives who were perfectly friendly people normally, but after a drink or two were raging assholes. I have had family members who were perfectly reasonable people, but when drunk abused their spouses. Try again.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
In post 2471, Shaziro wrote:I have relatives who were perfectly friendly people normally, but after a drink or two were raging assholes. I have had family members who were perfectly reasonable people, but when drunk abused their spouses. Try again.
Yes, and these people shouldn't drink. In that sense their freedom of food has, as promised, been taken away, for they may no longer ingest alcohol, at least not to the point of drunkenness.
There's nothing that says that a fake can't beat the real thing.
You must not imagine that for beings like you and us there can be laughter. The low men laugh, and we envy them. But for us, the higher ones, there is no laughter, only an unending vigil, purely serious, stretching on into the night.
