In post 2563, Shaziro wrote:A: You cannot become God or a god. You're a person, and a young one at that.
B: Accepting that one can't do everything doesn't make you any weaker, it just means that you accept your inherent weakness. You can't seek to improve and remove weaknesses until you accept that they're there. Assuming you are perfect, like you seem to be intent on, means you don't strive to improve.
C: You really won't instruct me on anything, much less any absolute truth.
D: You haven't changed reality. If you had, you could also make the change instant rather than it taking time, because you would change the reality of it taking time. You're not a god, and if you were you'd be a pretty shit one.
E: Again, if you can't accept that you have limitations, then you can't improve on them. Quit projecting.
I have a couple of things to say about your responses, as I can see why this argument has continued on this path for so long:
A. You cannot claim that you have limitations which wouldn't let you to reach a conclusion about this topic(for either side) and then use it as an argument against him. That isn't morally sound, and you are contradicting your own words by doing it. If you're going to impose an argument of not being able to reach the highest level of understanding as a human, you surely must be aware that you are signing a contract in which you can't even know what you just said for sure.
B. Yes, it does. A mentality in which you believe something to not be possible does hinder you, as a person who knows they can do something never even questions their own ability. It is also very pointless to believe something is not possible, because unless you have absolute knowledge of the universe(something you yourself claimed you to not have) you wouldn't be fully qualified to make that conclusion, and would only be burning your own bridges in the case that it was possible(in fact, it's so pointless to assume something is not possible that you're better of assuming it is and being wrong). If that doubt exists within yourself, it means you are not in that position and it is making you weaker. This doesn't mean you are assuming you are perfect, in fact it is quite the opposite: you are assuming nothing. The one who is actually assuming here is the one who stands in your position.
C. That is a consequence of you not being dedicated and committed to instructing yourself or learning at every opportunity, otherwise you would be able to use what someone else says to improve yourself regardless of what their intentions are with it, and would be much more open and willing to discuss and build together with other people. You not prioritizing learning is very clear, and there was no need to make this specification since everyone who can see it already knows it and everyone who cannot see it will not extract that from what you said. It's a pointless sentence.
D. Existing already changes reality, and change is inevitable in this universe. It is your choice to decide whether or not you are changing into better or changing into worse in any and every instant of your life, and that will inevitably spread to your surroundings(and it will much faster than you think). The connection of all things in the universe is what allows for anybody to be anything, and by trying to shun a specific part of the universe you are failing to understand the connection between your surroundings. This lack of knowledge can and will inevitably damaging yourself and the people around you, so I suggest you focus more of your attention on yourself, as you cannot change anything by pretending that you hold a certain position when you don't.
E. Seeking to become better is the nature of humans, and what you are saying is extremely inhumane. You are mistreating yourself and the people around you. I will repeat this one last time: anybody who can do something never questions whether or not they can do it. I see you questioning a lot right now.
Cheers!
