Keyen. Why would lynchproof ever be allowed in a normal game?In post 453, keyenpeydee wrote:What did LUV claim again? Is it lynchproof?In post 450, Creature wrote:idk about LUV claim, though nobody claimed so far and I don't think LUV would be the best to hold scum's only fakeclaim.
Happened in Civ 5. That's the current meta apparently. Let town destroy itself while the rest of the scums just coast.In post 465, Creature wrote:Scum sometimes lurk if they feel they won't be touched for the entire day.
Oh yeah btw I believe this claim.In post 467, Creature wrote:Oh right, I forgot LUV claimed Town Gunsmith.
I really don't think you understand how opportunistic that LUV vote was.In post 495, Avagantimos wrote:tldr, Lowell's town, LUV is town, the votes on Lowell are bad.
I understand exactly how opportunistic it was. It wasn't.In post 528, Alisae wrote:I really don't think you understand how opportunistic that LUV vote was.In post 495, Avagantimos wrote:tldr, Lowell's town, LUV is town, the votes on Lowell are bad.
Hold up. You're basicly saying here "This wagon is hell scummy, but I'M GONNA JOIN IT ANYWAYS!"In post 531, Avagantimos wrote:He saw a wagon building on LUV, explained why that wagon was scummy, and put his vote there, when other people, before and after him, voted LUV without sticking their neck out by explaining why.
PEDIT: "He saw a wagon building on LUV, explained why LUV was scummy, and put his vote there...."In post 533, Alisae wrote:Hold up. You're basicly saying here "This wagon is hell scummy, but I'M GONNA JOIN IT ANYWAYS!"In post 531, Avagantimos wrote:He saw a wagon building on LUV, explained why that wagon was scummy, and put his vote there, when other people, before and after him, voted LUV without sticking their neck out by explaining why.
Okay yeah sure, Lowell explained it, but the thing is wouldn't scum like to justify their vote anyways?
You called the vote opportunistic. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that opportunistic scum wouldn't be the only person presenting a real case on lynching town within the first 24 hours of playing the game. If the wagon succeeds, and LUV flips town, it makes Lowell the most suspicious person on the wagon. Essentially, the only way for Lowell to be scum here is if he's bussing or a colossal moron.In post 533, Alisae wrote:Okay yeah sure, Lowell explained it, but the thing is wouldn't scum like to justify their vote anyways?
Activity Level is not a reliable scumtellIn post 539, Creature wrote:What about this? I bug players lurking, they respond and you can sort them, if they don't respond, we lynch them.
However, it's obligation for players to be active so we can sort them and they don't just "blend in".In post 540, Alisae wrote:Activity Level is not a reliable scumtellIn post 539, Creature wrote:What about this? I bug players lurking, they respond and you can sort them, if they don't respond, we lynch them.
Your face is a reliable tell.In post 541, Eddie Cane wrote:nothing is a reliable scumtell
This is being quoted all over site, it needs to stop.In post 540, Alisae wrote:Activity Level is not a reliable scumtellIn post 539, Creature wrote:What about this? I bug players lurking, they respond and you can sort them, if they don't respond, we lynch them.
We pressure them:In post 545, Alisae wrote:You're basicly raising a "Lynch all Lurkers" PL. Gotcha.
This is their one post.In post 171, Umlaut wrote:VOTE: Alisae
Not random but mostly gut.
(Did you know JetBlue has complimentary wi-fi?)
