I told you I am ur sheep today.In post 548, Alisae wrote:Hey Creature.
Come join me on this amazing wagon
VOTE: Umlaut
Lowell is still scum, but I heard this wagon is also lit.
Why you being rude to me grandson.
VOTE: Umlaut
I told you I am ur sheep today.In post 548, Alisae wrote:Hey Creature.
Come join me on this amazing wagon
VOTE: Umlaut
Lowell is still scum, but I heard this wagon is also lit.
Fire I'm sorry ;~;In post 550, Firebringer wrote:Why you being rude to me grandson.
staaaaaaaawpIn post 555, gerryoat wrote:i claim 2 shot day cop. i got 2 mafia results
Ur ignoring my posts. And you comment on everything.In post 551, Alisae wrote:Fire I'm sorry ;~;In post 550, Firebringer wrote:Why you being rude to me grandson.
Talk to me more about this?
All everything those people have done is NAI. I am sensing a pattern here Alisae. What's the deal with going after people who have barely contributed? I thought you said lurking is not a solid Scum tell. What gives?In post 560, Alisae wrote:Fykus/Lowell/Umlaut/Lexa are scum let's go people.
Town postIn post 570, Alisae wrote:OH NO!!!!!!!!!!!
While I agree with the sentiment here, I find more often than not it doesn't play out well. In games where town is appropriately pressuring lurkers, scum lurkers increase their posting, and town lurkers don't.In post 547, Creature wrote:We pressure them:In post 545, Alisae wrote:You're basicly raising a "Lynch all Lurkers" PL. Gotcha.
1. They respond, we sort them.
1a. If they manage to somehow be town, we sorted them.
1b. If we're still in doubt or think they're scum, pressure them more or just lynch.
2. They don't respond, we lynch them because town wouldn't refuse to respond.
How is that a Town post? That's like the easiest thing in the world to fake.