Open 55 - Vanilla 2:10 (Abandoned) before 542

[ryan]

new question:

who the fuck is killa seven?

$10 says its ryan.

This is actually logical.

Are you serious? Please do me a favor and isolate Lowell's posts and tell me HOW he's being anything more than just an ass in this game?

[pwayne66]

...are you reasoning with flameaxe?

FOS:ryan

[pickemgenius]

this is quickly becoming one of my favorite games.

[TylerJ]

Vote: Killa7

If he is scum then I am 100% certain that tyler is.

Plz tell me your joking... For some reason I have forgotten were the line of sarcasm is.

[ryan]

...are you reasoning with flameaxe?

FOS:ryan

[destructor]

pwayne, is there a reason for the complete unhelpfulness of your last few posts? Or maybe I'm reading them all wrong and they are actually helpful. Please let me know how, if this is the case.

I hate to say it, but this game's pretty shit right now. One liners that make no contribution to the game, people bitching and just generally being immature. Wtf?

This is an interesting exchange, particularly in light of your 122, destructor. I agree that you did the right thing, calling TylerJ out on this. It's interesting that it was you that did it after your 122, though.

I'm not really sure what you're refering to here. Yes, I said I was finding it hard to sort the serious from the non-serious, but I'm still trying to generate content, even in 122.

[pwayne66]

[/quote="destructor"]pwayne, is there a reason for the complete unhelpfulness of your last few posts? Or maybe I'm reading them all wrong and they are actually helpful. Please let me know how, if this is the case. [/quote]

You aren't wrong. Lowell, Elmo, ryan and fireaxe were all making me jealous with their complete unhelpfulness so I couldn't resist.

[TylerJ]

pwayne were you being sarcastic about the the Killa7 stuff? call me blonde if ya want.

[pwayne66]

^^^Yes. I was kidding^^^

[Flameaxe]

[/quote="destructor"]pwayne, is there a reason for the complete unhelpfulness of your last few posts? Or maybe I'm reading them all wrong and they are actually helpful. Please let me know how, if this is the case.

You aren't wrong. Lowell, Elmo, ryan and fireaxe were all making me jealous with their complete unhelpfulness so I couldn't resist.[/quote]

I agree. This "fireaxe" fellow is really unhelpful indeed.

[pickemgenius]

[/quote="destructor"]pwayne, is there a reason for the complete unhelpfulness of your last few posts? Or maybe I'm reading them all wrong and they are actually helpful. Please let me know how, if this is the case.

You aren't wrong. Lowell, Elmo, ryan and fireaxe were all making me jealous with their complete unhelpfulness so I couldn't resist.

I agree. This "fireaxe" fellow is really unhelpful indeed.[/quote]

ctrl+5

this is news to me!

so let's lynch Elmo already ffs.

[destructor]

Why Elmo? At least he's provided some opinions.

If we want to go with who's provided the bare minimum of anything we should lynch JDodge, Flameaxe, Tobaissen, Lowell or DeathSauce. Maybe in that order.

[pwayne66]

... hows about matchhatchet?

[pickemgenius]

Why Elmo? At least he's provided some opinions.

If we want to go with who's provided the bare minimum of anything we should lynch JDodge, Flameaxe, Tobaissen, Lowell or DeathSauce. Maybe in that order.

Elmo

, he's always scum.

Godfather

Yes.

Vote Elmo

Yes.

This is madness!

Yes.

Vote

:

Tobiassen

.

prodding Elmo

Yes.

Just because there are no power roles does not mean that townies will be more interested in this game.

Yes.

In reality, a lynch all lurkers approach to this game seems to provide scum with an exact blue print for making it to the end game.

No.

Elmo, when you return to us, I've noticed a pattern in your play in previous games I've been in with you: some games, you totally ignore or post only one-liners, and other games, you over-post to absurd (and quite often hostile) lengths. Care to discuss?

Yes.

It'd be grand if you could tell us what makes him suspicious.

Yes.

Yes.

Unvote

:

Tobiassen

;

vote

:

Jester

.

I also don't care for how Lowell is playing the game. Ditto Elmo, who just isn't playing this game.

No.

his baiting of ryan

No.

Reasoning?

Yes.

Vote: TylerJ

Yes.

Yes, No, Vote:, Good ass opinions there if I must so say!

Reasoning: Yes!

Brilliant!!!!

[Flameaxe]

Vote: Elmo

Violently poke with a stick: destructor.

[TylerJ]

Vote:elmo

Yes.

[destructor]

He's at L-2 now.

Elmo, I'll put you at L-1 if you don't give us some thing more than yes/no. I honestly believe your yes/no posts were acceptable early in the game but not anymore.

[pwayne66]

unvote, Vote:Elmo

Lynch -1

[ryan]

I really hope this wagon isn't scum driven as Elmo hasn't posted since the 27th and it looks as though we've put him at -1 rather fast for his answers to questions (there have been a few others who ALSO haven't done anything yet this game) which to me is just as bad as yes and no answers.

[pwayne66]

...you think he would likely answer the questions if he only had more time?

As far as everybody else that hasn't posted: prod and replace. Elmo is posting just enough to avoid replacement but is very intentional providing zero content. He is not misunderstood. He is not being unfairly pressured. He has had ample time to post something. He has received plenty of warnings. He is blatantly phucking with us and it is decidedly anti-town.

[pwayne66]

I won't disagree that there are reasons to be concerned. Whether or not Elmo's actions cause him to be worthy of lynch -1 is not one of those reasons.

...wrong for all the right reasons.

This is the real cause for concern here. Are we wrong for the right reasons? I am hoping that Elmo clear this up soon, as it is clear that he has no problem posting content in his other games.

[destructor]

What we're seeing right now is exactly what I thought his posts were acceptable early in the game. We've just seen a wagon form on someone for, arguably, not more much than a playstyle. Yes, I absolutely agree that if he keeps that up he's being totally anti-town, but I don't see it as scummy.

peg apparently doesn't think Elmo's provided us opinions, but I remember reading one of his posts that, if taken literally, actually told us a bit about what his thoughts on the game so far were. It's not very helpful, yes, but more helpful than most of the one-liners we've seen lately.

[Elmo]

*shrug*

I never thought destructor suggesting lynch all lurkers was a bad idea; I don't generally agree with it wholesale, but I can certainly see why someone would suggest it, especially in a mountainous. As far as I can see, that's what started the destructor wagon, and I don't/didn't like it. I rather disliked Jester's hop on the wagon in 82, so I voted him. I also didn't like TylerJ's vote, hence my agreement with pwayne66's vote in 121; Jesters' felt more like he was reaching for a thin reason to justify it rather than it being obvious he didn't have a good reason, which (modulo WIFOM) generally seems scummier to me.

I don't really know what DeathSauce is on about. His comment on page 2 could have been a joke, I guess; I have difficulty believing it's a scumtell. Can't, offhand, think of a good reason why he's supposed to be scum.

With respect to my wagon, I wouldn't be at all surprised if there were scum on it, no.

pwayne66: I would've answered anything if it were posed to me, and I don't think I've provided zero content, although I suppose that leads to a debate about what constitutes content.

Beyond the above, ask away.

[pwayne66]

Unvote

[ryan]

Elmo: Who do you believe are the scum on your bandwagon? (since you basically said you thought there were scum on it)