With 9 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.
A 1 day extension has been granted!
Also, Prod timers will be changing very soon. Please be aware and active!
I answered this in 174. Is there something you are unclear on or want me to go in more depth about?In post 242, beeboy wrote:Why?In post 170, Sobolev Space wrote: I spent a while looking at this. I'm pretty sure it's town
Scum is more likely to be self aware about something like this, no? I know you're sorting them still, but would you be willing to lynch either JW or SS?In post 241, beeboy wrote:GD: 160 This post is basically a POE that scum reads all the lurkers and GD isn't even that self aware about it.
Not really, I'd rather a different lurker to him if it came down to it.MarioManiac4 wrote:I like a beeboy lynch. Does anyone like a beeboy lynch?
In post 254, Zachstralkita wrote:Zulfy if you get replaced im going to be mad ( ( (
Can you go more in depth on it? I just don't see how being non committal on scum reads could be seen as town, like that isn't mostly POE that is literally just full blown POE town reading like all the people who have any amount of posts.In post 252, Sobolev Space wrote:I answered this in 174. Is there something you are unclear on or want me to go in more depth about?
They are actively trying to sort people and solve the game.In post 252, Sobolev Space wrote:Beeboy, what "town things" do you think Treble has been doing?
I've pulled similar stuff as town and I was self aware about it. Like as town I just tend to look at my reads and go "something is wrong here" while as scum I just make reads and move on.In post 253, Writers Bloque wrote:Scum is more likely to be self aware about something like this, no? I know you're sorting them still, but would you be willing to lynch either JW or SS?
y thoIn post 251, MarioManiac4 wrote:I like a beeboy lynch. Does anyone like a beeboy lynch?
Read post 171 to discover that I am in fact self-aware about it.In post 241, beeboy wrote: GD: 160 This post is basically a POE that scum reads all the lurkers and GD isn't even that self aware about it.
Is this still your listIn post 217, Treblesome wrote:So.
{SS}
{MM4, Gingham}
{lurkers at null}
{WB}
{JasonWazza}
reads at present.
At the time I posted, I didn't realize there were two pages. From that POV, beeboy's only post said "not rvs," which I thought was a joke OMGUS vote so I followed Mario. Hopefully that explains the lack of context. That said, while I think massclaiming wasn't the right thing to do (it should just come whenever necessary), I think it's NAI (a la Gingham's 23).In post 44, GinghamDog wrote:Why beeboy if you're agreeing with him?In post 36, Edosurist wrote:VOTE: beeboy
CHOOCHOO
Massclaiming hoods is stupid. We should just claim them as it becomes necessary, like Wroter's Bloque has said.
Got some misrepping over here.In post 187, Writers Bloque wrote:So if we wrote our posts a certain way you wouldn't think they're fake?
Basically.. what scum is supposed to do?
Where's SS agreeing? I think this is a typo. SS was siding with you.In post 182, MarioManiac4 wrote:OK so this game is somewhere on the spectrum of death and I feel like I need to explain what I am saying about Jason because for some reason Sobolev seems to be agreeing with him and if I'm making what I am saying clear I can't think of a reason for someone to do that.
Going to their reaction starting at 143 (Jason/MM sorted list), I particularly find 147 to be problematic. MM asked for Jason to explain what he gathered from the reaction and Jason just dodges it and accuses MM of discrediting him."It's almost like i push for reactions, but no you have to play the game your way don't you?"- This is JasonWazza justifying his vote on me. He says he is pushing for reactions, but nowhere is there actualpushingfor those reactions. OK, so I hadn't posted for a while when that exact post was made; but even when Iwasposting, there was no actual pushing, and there is none now. Look at 38. What do you see here? What I see is Jason disagreeing with my points. (He's arguing with premises I didn't hold, but I doubt that's actually indicative of his alignment.) But where is the pushing? How does he want me to respond to these points? Basically, he's just calling my premise stupid and using that to vote for me. I don't see any questions pushing, I see a weak justification for a vote. And he was trying to call me pushing on him for that him actually taking the initiative for actually pushing for reactions, with his vote that was meant to push for reactions. Instead, what I see there is Jason manufacturing a weak scumread on Page 2, and lingering onto that scumread because he doesn't want to push any new content. His read is stale, and although it's a "push for reactions" which is supposed to look like scumhunting, in reality, it's a substitute for scumhunting.