♡☭☆ Mini Normal 1933 - Shiba Inus! - Game Over!☆☭♡

Mulch · Post Post #1100 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:29 pm

"I don't do pre flip associates"

"obvious buddy claim, Danny!"

Narna · Post Post #1101 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:30 pm

That's like a buddying claim, not scumbuddy. I sees it now.

rb · Post Post #1102 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:32 pm

In post 1100, Mulch wrote:"I don't do pre flip associates"

"obvious buddy claim, Danny!"

even if ur scum, this is a stupid thing to say

iDanyboy · Post Post #1103 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:33 pm

I have asked you a question rb but you said 'one thing at a time', you still haven't explained why you think Mulch is scummy for not crumbing but GameReplacement is. My first post of the game had questions for you as well but you have ignored that too. So I have been trying to solve the game, pointing out incosistencies is one of the ways I try to do that. I also don't understand what your scum reading me for.

Narna · Post Post #1104 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:33 pm

In post 1096, Mulch wrote:
In post 1094, Narna wrote:
In post 1087, iDanyboy wrote:@Narna, Why do you even find TIAM scummy?
The stuff that's mostly been covered already. His Former vote sucked, I don't see his questions as productive, I don't like his response to pressure. His Mulch vote is left unexplained. The only thing people seem to tr him for is the fact that he's new. Which is nai since rolls aren't dived out besed on experience. I'm not seeing blatant newb!town here.
I am

I'm seeing the opposite.

Narna wrote:Newb town would have just claimed there. I've seen it many a time. New scum gets antsy over a few votes, and threatens to claim without something to back it up.

Mulch · Post Post #1105 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:33 pm

You just flat out lied, lmao @rb

rb · Post Post #1106 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:34 pm

sigh

please go back to the newbie queue

rb · Post Post #1107 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:34 pm

this isn't productive for you no matter what your alignment is

rb · Post Post #1108 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:35 pm

In post 1103, iDanyboy wrote:I have asked you a question rb but you said 'one thing at a time', you still haven't explained why you think Mulch is scummy for not crumbing but GameReplacement is. My first post of the game had questions for you as well but you have ignored that too. So I have been trying to solve the game, pointing out incosistencies is one of the ways I try to do that. I also don't understand what your scum reading me for.

yeah, one thing at a time

mulch is here - game replacement is not

i can't interact with every single player at all times.

so...

ONE THING AT A TIME GENERALLY IMPLIES IM GOING TO GET AROUND TO GAME REPLACEMENT _AFTER THIS ONE THING HE WILL BECOME THE ONE THING_

rb · Post Post #1109 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:36 pm

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1110 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:42 pm

Dany, is your beef with rb about one of the reasons he's scum reading Mulch? Scum reading Mulch for softing a PR without crumbing but not scum reading Vedith for the same thing?

Mulch · Post Post #1111 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:49 pm

In post 1106, rb wrote:sigh

please go back to the newbie queue

Your scum

Mulch · Post Post #1112 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:49 pm

In post 1110, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Dany, is your beef with rb about one of the reasons he's scum reading Mulch? Scum reading Mulch for softing a PR without crumbing but not scum reading Vedith for the same thing?

I will answer for him: Yes

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #1113 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:50 pm

I didn't "threaten to claim". I offered to claim and asked for opinions on if I should. I was calling out the stupidity of the votes, not "getting ansy".

rb · Post Post #1114 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:51 pm

so we have 3 softed PR claims

Vedith, Mulch, 2iam

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1115 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:51 pm

So why does rb need to interact with Vedith again to explain the difference between his soft and Mulch's?

rb · Post Post #1116 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:52 pm

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1117 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:52 pm

In post 1113, TwoInAMillion wrote:I didn't "threaten to claim". I offered to claim and asked for opinions on if I should. I was calling out the stupidity of the votes, not "getting ansy".

Why did you find the votes stupid?

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #1118 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:53 pm

because there was little/no valid reasoning.

rb · Post Post #1119 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:53 pm

why do you expect early game votes to have lots of or very valid reasoning?

rb · Post Post #1120 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:54 pm

how does the game progress from low content to high content if people aren't willing to draw conclusions from small pieces of information? what other way do you expect people to somehow create momentum and get the game moving?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1121 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:55 pm

In post 1118, TwoInAMillion wrote:because there was little/no valid reasoning.

Why were the reasons that were given not valid?

TwoInAMillion · Post Post #1122 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:56 pm

I don't necessarily, but I'm not going to allow myself to be the victim of a bad wagon either. I was providing plenty of content, the wagon was unnecessary.

rb · Post Post #1123 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:58 pm

i'm also expecting transcend will move his vote from me soon, and if he doesn't he's definitely scum

he knows me well enough that i can see him being concerned about my earlier play, but he knows me well enough to now be satisfied

~

2iam - where was the plenty of content?

Lil Uzi Vert · Post Post #1124 (ISO) » Sun Jul 30, 2017 12:58 pm

In post 1122, TwoInAMillion wrote:I don't necessarily, but I'm not going to allow myself to be the victim of a bad wagon either. I was providing plenty of content, the wagon was unnecessary.

And why was your content indicative of being town?