Large Normal 208 - Fireworks Festival [End]

pienyan · Post Post #1650 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:03 pm

votecount 1-2.7

Whiskers (3) - Alisae, Flubbernugget, Quick

Alisae (1) - Whiskers
Joey_ (1) - Nero Cain
Quick (1) - beeboy
UC Voyager (1) - Rhah
Flubbernugget (1) - Joey_

Not voting (9) - Shiro, I Am Innocent, AxleGreaser, HolySpiritTurtle, Cabd, UC Voyager, Nauci, TwoInAMillion, gerryoat

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch. Deadline is October 23, 15:00 GMT-7 or in (expired on 2017-10-23 15:00:00).

Quick · Post Post #1651 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:04 pm

In post 1647, beeboy wrote:Also Flubber has no solid content he has a few catch up posts that don't reference any content in the thread in particular at all. Like how is that solid content?

Don't know what to tell you. I have really agreed with a lot of what Flubber has said in their analysis'.

In post 1647, beeboy wrote:Also what parts of the game in particular am I trying to pocket Alisae?

You were sheeping Alisae pretty hard core for a while there.

beeboy · Post Post #1652 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:06 pm

In post 1651, Quick wrote:Don't know what to tell you.

Telling me the parts you agree with would be a good start.

In post 1651, Quick wrote:You were sheeping Alisae pretty hard core for a while there.

My scum read on you was independent choice of mine and my Whisker read was more me sheeping Nero.

Quick · Post Post #1653 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:09 pm

In post 1652, beeboy wrote:
In post 1651, Quick wrote:Don't know what to tell you.
Telling me the parts you agree with would be a good start.

Nope, don't feel like it. Besides, I think this line of questioning is quite odd for you.

In post 1651, Quick wrote:You were sheeping Alisae pretty hard core for a while there.

My scum read on you was independent choice of mine and my Whisker read was more me sheeping Nero.[/quote]

Can you back this up?

Quick · Post Post #1654 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:09 pm

In post 1653, Quick wrote:
In post 1652, beeboy wrote:
In post 1651, Quick wrote:Don't know what to tell you.
Telling me the parts you agree with would be a good start.
Nope, don't feel like it. Besides, I think this line of questioning is quite odd for you.

In post 1652, beeboy wrote:
In post 1651, Quick wrote:You were sheeping Alisae pretty hard core for a while there.
My scum read on you was independent choice of mine and my Whisker read was more me sheeping Nero.
Can you back this up?

EBWOP, sorry.

beeboy · Post Post #1655 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:10 pm

In post 1653, Quick wrote:Nope, don't feel like it. Besides, I think this line of questioning is quite odd for you.

What do you even know about me?

beeboy · Post Post #1656 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:12 pm

In post 730, beeboy wrote:
In post 726, gerryoat wrote:Alisae and beeboy, why do you SR quick
He has 0 real reads, poor reactions and LQ doesnt feel like a player who would refuse to read a game.

In post 731, beeboy wrote:And the 2 reads he did make are really shallow

I stated my reasoning before Alisae did here.

Quick · Post Post #1657 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:12 pm

In post 1655, beeboy wrote:
In post 1653, Quick wrote:Nope, don't feel like it. Besides, I think this line of questioning is quite odd for you.
What do you even know about me?

You like to fuck around a lot.

beeboy · Post Post #1658 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:12 pm

In post 1657, Quick wrote:
In post 1655, beeboy wrote:
In post 1653, Quick wrote:Nope, don't feel like it. Besides, I think this line of questioning is quite odd for you.
What do you even know about me?
You like to fuck around a lot.

Your just conf biasing me at this point, asking you about your reads isn't odd.

beeboy · Post Post #1659 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:13 pm

Like asking you about your reads is pretty mafia 101, you have 0 game experience with me and your saying asking about your reads is odd.

beeboy · Post Post #1660 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:13 pm

I've spent almost this entire game trying to get more in depth thoughts out of you ffs.

Quick · Post Post #1661 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:14 pm

In post 1656, beeboy wrote:
In post 730, beeboy wrote:
In post 726, gerryoat wrote:Alisae and beeboy, why do you SR quick
He has 0 real reads, poor reactions and LQ doesnt feel like a player who would refuse to read a game.

In post 731, beeboy wrote:And the 2 reads he did make are really shallow
I stated my reasoning before Alisae did here.

Here is my counter:

In post 697, Quick wrote:
In post 695, Alisae wrote:A. Ok Ima just let this interaction play out
B. Eh the way you phrased it sounded kinda wierd then because if it was a counter then Cabd would have to know for sure that another non-normal role existed. That's what I got out of your phrasing anyways but I don't think its this is that big of a deal atm so...
Why are you still voting for me?

beeboy · Post Post #1662 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:15 pm

In post 700, Alisae wrote:
In post 697, Quick wrote:
In post 695, Alisae wrote:A. Ok Ima just let this interaction play out
B. Eh the way you phrased it sounded kinda wierd then because if it was a counter then Cabd would have to know for sure that another non-normal role existed. That's what I got out of your phrasing anyways but I don't think its this is that big of a deal atm so...
Why are you still voting for me?
None of your latest posting really made me change my mind because I think it comes from you as either alignment

Alisae's reasoning was different from mine.
Like that doesn't prove I didn't have my own independent thoughts.

Are you just reading the thread trying to discredit me or are you actually thinking?
Because I am almost positive you aren't thinking at this point.

beeboy · Post Post #1663 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:17 pm

Like the "sheep" reason was you aren't the type of player to refuse to read the game.
But refusing to read the game is more something meta of being an awful player dismisses not an opinion I had due to having some kind of high expectations from your play.

Quick · Post Post #1664 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:18 pm

In post 1662, beeboy wrote:
In post 700, Alisae wrote:
In post 697, Quick wrote:
In post 695, Alisae wrote:A. Ok Ima just let this interaction play out
B. Eh the way you phrased it sounded kinda wierd then because if it was a counter then Cabd would have to know for sure that another non-normal role existed. That's what I got out of your phrasing anyways but I don't think its this is that big of a deal atm so...
Why are you still voting for me?
None of your latest posting really made me change my mind because I think it comes from you as either alignment
Alisae's reasoning was different from mine.
Like that doesn't prove I didn't have my own independent thoughts.

Are you just reading the thread trying to discredit me or are you actually thinking?
Because I am almost positive you aren't thinking at this point.

If you recall, your reasons for Scum reading me were literally false.

beeboy · Post Post #1665 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:19 pm

erm.
If you had meta of being shit awful I'd dismiss the argument you were trying to avoid reading the game.
But you don't which is why I voted you and I wasn't sure who you were an alt of before

^ better wording.

beeboy · Post Post #1666 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:19 pm

In post 1664, Quick wrote:If you recall, your reasons for Scum reading me were literally false.

I said your reads were shallow which they were.

Quick · Post Post #1667 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:19 pm

In post 1663, beeboy wrote:Like the "sheep" reason was you aren't the type of player to refuse to read the game.
But refusing to read the game is more something meta of being an awful player dismisses not an opinion I had due to having some kind of high expectations from your play.

You should have high expectations of my play, I am a beast!

beeboy · Post Post #1668 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:20 pm

I am fucking tired of interacting with Quick when he is arguing for the sake of arguing right now without actually trying to do anything outside conf biasing like crazy.

pedit: if your town I am going to have really low expectations of you from here on out.

Quick · Post Post #1669 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:21 pm

In post 1666, beeboy wrote:
In post 1664, Quick wrote:If you recall, your reasons for Scum reading me were literally false.
I said your reads were shallow which they were.

No, you said:

In post 1656, beeboy wrote:
In post 730, beeboy wrote:
In post 726, gerryoat wrote:Alisae and beeboy, why do you SR quick
He has 0 real reads, poor reactions and LQ doesnt feel like a player who would refuse to read a game.

Quick · Post Post #1670 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:22 pm

In post 1668, beeboy wrote:I am fucking tired of interacting with Quick when he is arguing for the sake of arguing right now without actually trying to do anything outside conf biasing like crazy.

pedit: if your town I am going to have really low expectations of you from here on out.

You were the one who started going at me. Giving up already?

beeboy · Post Post #1671 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:23 pm

In post 731, beeboy wrote:And the 2 reads he did make are really shallow

beeboy · Post Post #1672 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:23 pm

Quick is really making me want to replace out as well.
It's like he is incapable of reading and not being an asshole

beeboy · Post Post #1673 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:24 pm

Like I posted that quote on this fucking page that said I thought the 2 reads you made were really shallow and your fucking arguing I never said that.

beeboy · Post Post #1674 (ISO) » Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:25 pm

In post 1672, beeboy wrote:Quick is really making me want to replace out as well.
It's like he is incapable of reading
and not being an asshole

sorry that part wasn't needed