I like you're reasoning. In my mind, that would make a lot of sense.In post 115, iamausername wrote:UNVOTE: burn_209
VOTE: SonOfZeus
just had a little bit of a hallelujah moment. no, wait. a eureka moment. that's the expression. this guy is scum. he revealed himself in post 94; he says Silver Bard is "about to be lynched", which indicates that he is not paying any attention to the gamestate and does not actually care who is going to be lynched today (as long as it isn't him, one assumes).
he came in, saw that Bard was being wagoned, made sure to speak against that wagon for town cred when Bard flips town, and parked a vote on a random member of said wagon. those who are asking "of all the people on the Bard wagon, why burn?" to Dolittle need to be looking in Zeus's direction and asking "why JKLM?"
he's giving the appearance of trying to shut down the Bard wagon, but clearly has no actual interest in doing so, as evidenced by the twin facts that
a) he assumes his attempt has been unsuccesful and that Bard remains "about to be lynched" a page later, despite this not actually being the case.
b) he makes no attempt whatsoever to push an alternate wagon. he votes JKLM, asks him why Bard is scum, and then makes no further pushes in that direction and instead spends his time asking snitty questions to Bard, his apparent town read, and even has the gall to tell Bard off for not pushing on scumreads enough.
In post 105, qwints wrote:Silver, the point I was trying to make was that your vig 'claim' was a null tell, since scum could do it without being in danger of an automatic lynch. I think it leans town, but I wanted to see if anyone was going to really try and treat your post like a vig claim No one did, so no further reason to pursue it.
Doolittle's getting scummier.
In post 90, DrDolittle wrote:^ no what you say is false.
I first claim that the attack is unwarranted. Then I proceed to show that the attack is hypocritical. I don't see anything wrong with both defenses.
OMGUSing people who attack you have actually have evidence.In post 132, SonOfZeus wrote:Alright. So first off, I wasn't defending Silver at all. I was merely stating that voting him based off him saying he might have picked up a vig role is complete garbage. The reason I'm so passive about it is because in over a week of this game we have in total six pages to read. IE, very little content. I don't townread Bard, in fact, I find TSO's vote on him completely justified, because attempting to manipulate Greys had absolutely no town motivation. UNVOTE: At this point, if I was to be lynched, I would say my biggest scumread is thegeneral. Let's analyze his posts:
7: Votes Grey for BWing in RVS. Fine. As far as reasoning this early, this is fine. No attempt to get him lynched, nothing really scummy about it.
62: Really nothing is said here except he says he will post more.
106: Randomly commented on something in an awkward fashion, had really no reasoning in my opinion.
113: Questions someone voting someone who just joined the game. The person has written 0 content, a vote is most likely to just get them talking. Really can't see any scum motivation for randomly voting someone who just joined. If thegeneral had questioned TSO because of how confident TSO is that Bard will flip scum, and because it's wierd that TSO is abandoning his push just to reaction test someone, then I would understand that. However, it merely looks like fillery BS to me.
126/127: Sheeps the vote on me without stating much, except that he likes the reasoning, however, is ok with a dolittle lynch as well, again without saying why.
VOTE: thegeneral
And? Bard did all of those things. What's your point?In post 123, DrDolittle wrote:Here's my interpretation of Burn's posts
1. Bard is to cause confusionIn post 24, burn_209 wrote: Because of that I think Silver Beards case is a whole bunch of shit slinging and he is trying to cause confusion more than discussion.
VOTE: Silver Beard
2. Bard is hiding something or just screwing aroundIn post 29, burn_209 wrote:Im sure either Bard is full of shit or not telling he whole story.
3. Bard just has a bad argument and he fucked upIn post 37, burn_209 wrote:
His case was so bad that I dont think people make a case that bad without an agenda behind it. I mean the mafia having some information about roles on D1? Yea not going to happen and anyone that has semi played mafia knows how ludicrous that sounds. It just seems like a lot of bullshit from someone who fucked up and is now reeling
Lynch on sight.In post 15, The Silver Bard wrote:I might have picked up a vig role in this game.
Not sure what to think about this. Null at best but extremely disappointing.In post 21, iamausername wrote:and i think you know this. i don't buy this as a good faith argument. it's scummy trap card nonsense, not scumhunting.
Can you quote where he said that?Burn wrote:Im pretty sure the scum didnt get a layout of what roles were in the game. That would be stupid and I personally have never seen it happen.
Eh. This is a decent point. I can't ignore his bullshit reads that change every post though.In post 70, inte wrote:ima go ahead and ask you what the scum motivation is for claiming to be a vigilante
what did you understand in those 5 pages?In post 107, The General wrote:my brain is rebelling when I try to understand the 5 pages of walls of text and WIFoM.
didn't think this needed to be said earlier but this is genericscumcomment101In post 38, DrDolittle wrote:The speed of Bard's wagon bothers me.
what is your current read of grey?In post 78, DrDolittle wrote:Grey's vote was clearly just a weak read based on nothing very substantial
So you think both me and burn is scum? In that case you are stupid beyond belief and should just change your vote to me and keep it there, and we can both prey that I get lynched, because I can't stand playing with stupid people.In post 138, Hiraki wrote:Lynch on sight.In post 15, The Silver Bard wrote:I might have picked up a vig role in this game.
Not sure what to think about this. Null at best but extremely disappointing.In post 21, iamausername wrote:and i think you know this. i don't buy this as a good faith argument. it's scummy trap card nonsense, not scumhunting.
Can you quote where he said that?Burn wrote:Im pretty sure the scum didnt get a layout of what roles were in the game. That would be stupid and I personally have never seen it happen.
45 is the entire reasoning of why Bard needs to die ASAP.
Burn and Bard are fine lynches for today. Especially the early game defiance and then the switch on Page 3 by Burn. Noobscumin' it up.
Eh. This is a decent point. I can't ignore his bullshit reads that change every post though.In post 70, inte wrote:ima go ahead and ask you what the scum motivation is for claiming to be a vigilante
I'm willing to change the order to Burn->Bard but I want Bard dead before LYLO.
DrDolittle could post more but I see no reason to vote him yet.
Vote: Burn
All 2 of my votes? And do you truly see my vote on burn as an OMGUS? Is none of my reasoning on why I believe him to be scum not OMGUS?In post 146, greygnarl wrote:Just realized all of Bard's votes this game were OMGUS. Pretty sketchy. Also, pretty sure if he is scum then all of his 3 lynches are town.