Open 44 - Twofold Mafia: GAME OVER! before 506
-
-
Max Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: April 11, 2006
-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
-
-
somestrangeflea Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1783
- Joined: June 20, 2007
- Location: Location, Location
-
-
ChocolateAttack Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 250
- Joined: July 14, 2007
My reason for believe he is a town because early game, most scum will just drop a random vote and lurk around or wait for an appropriate bandwagon to claim on. Beside, i don't think a scum would go around promoting reasoning votes.theopor_COD wrote:
I'll comment on everything else shortly. Note I found ChronX's vote slightly scummy because it was the third on the wagon something which he called Dasquian out on.ChocolateAttack wrote:I think ChronX action is explainable and i think he is town.vote:Shaft.ed
The above however rings my scumdar more. "You think he is town" why? for moving the game forward supposedly? Do you think scum would not look to promote discussion?
Another point is Shaft.ed is too hasty to grap on Chonx so i make a connection between a scum-voting-town.-
-
theopor_COD PhD'oh!
- PhD'oh!
- PhD'oh!
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: January 14, 2007
-
-
ChronX Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 672
- Joined: August 27, 2007
-
-
TylerJ Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 620
- Joined: August 16, 2007
CA that is WIFOM. I agree, but you get someone who thinks it thorugh, or is good at pretending, then you are at a standstill. So in the end I disagree...
honestly I have no idea on Shaft.ed. I have no inclination to say he is town or mafia. I need to look more in depth through this thread again, I hope I will be able to do that soon, my schedule is catching up on me.├óÔé¼┼ôVery few of us are what we seem.├óÔé¼-
-
TylerJ Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 620
- Joined: August 16, 2007
I reread and found my vision clearing some. Theopor seemed to jump Chronx with little reasoning. An even the reasoning he gave wasn't strong.
As to why I voted for Jdodge, it was a weak vote with little conviction. I should have said FOS, but for some reason forgotten about I voted for him. That's about it...
Anyway, JDodge doesn't actually seem suspicious to me right now. But I hate not knowing who to go after. But seeing Theopors post again, he seems suspicious...so...
unvote
FOS: Theopor├óÔé¼┼ôVery few of us are what we seem.├óÔé¼-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
TylerJ wrote:As to why I voted for Jdodge, it was a weak vote with little conviction. I should have said FOS, but for some reason forgotten about I voted for him. That's about it...
Anyway, JDodge doesn't actually seem suspicious to me right now.But I hate not knowing who to go after. But seeing Theopors post again, he seems suspicious...so...Unvote, vote: Tyler-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
-
-
TylerJ Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 620
- Joined: August 16, 2007
-
-
MCHammer Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 153
- Joined: July 24, 2007
- Location: Cornwall
...unless of course they areCA wrote:My reason for believe he is a town because early game, most scum will just drop a random vote and lurk around or wait for an appropriate bandwagon to claim on. Beside, i don't think a scum would go around promoting reasoning votes.smarttown...I don't really agree with this, maybe in a Newbie game, but not here.
I'm finding it hard right now to havedefinatescum/not scum views (although this is a common problem for me - there seem to be a fair few wagons attempted, but this is a bad indication either way for me.
I think I'm happy staying with my first instinct for the moment & see how things develop.
however;nos: CAfor the above quoted-
-
ChocolateAttack Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 250
- Joined: July 14, 2007
Nope, i wasn't WIFOM because i said i only make a connection between his action so i can be wrong about this. That why I placed a vote on him because i wanted to see how his reaction toward my vote, defensive or offensive but till this point, he hasn't make a response to my vote yet so i sense something wrong here.TylerJ wrote:CA that is WIFOM. I agree, but you get someone who thinks it thorugh, or is good at pretending, then you are at a standstill. So in the end I disagree...
honestly I have no idea on Shaft.ed. I have no inclination to say he is town or mafia. I need to look more in depth through this thread again, I hope I will be able to do that soon, my schedule is catching up on me.-
-
ChocolateAttack Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 250
- Joined: July 14, 2007
Smart towns usually lay loy and try to pin down one or two scum with most accurate evidence then they will start to show themselve. Try to too stand out is not likely to be something a protown would do.groinhammer wrote:
...unless of course they areCA wrote:My reason for believe he is a town because early game, most scum will just drop a random vote and lurk around or wait for an appropriate bandwagon to claim on. Beside, i don't think a scum would go around promoting reasoning votes.smarttown...I don't really agree with this, maybe in a Newbie game, but not here.
I'm finding it hard right now to havedefinatescum/not scum views (although this is a common problem for me - there seem to be a fair few wagons attempted, but this is a bad indication either way for me.
I think I'm happy staying with my first instinct for the moment & see how things develop.
however;nos: CAfor the above quoted
Oh well! we could lynch him and see what his status is. If he turn out town, my theory is damn right! lol! i was just kidding!-
-
Rishi A Meer townie
- A Meer townie
- A Meer townie
- Posts: 3055
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Arlington, VA
Why would you make that statement when you're one of the players who is standing out? It's hard to judge the alignment of the players who are standing out the most. I think each player has their own particular playstyle. I have noticed that some people, no matter if they are town or scum, they tend to lurk. Others will be loud no matter what.ChocolateAttack wrote: Smart towns usually lay loy and try to pin down one or two scum with most accurate evidence then they will start to show themselve. Try to too stand out is not likely to be something a protown would do.
It's very hard to separate people into camps on Day 1. Day 1 is important though. Once people start dying, we'll know their alignment and be able to look back at Day 1 for voting patterns, etc.Taking a break from MS. Please send e-mail if you want to get in touch with me.-
-
TylerJ Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 620
- Joined: August 16, 2007
-
-
ChocolateAttack Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 250
- Joined: July 14, 2007
Yup, this is a bad play from me. I was trying to lay low until i got all questioned.Rishi wrote:
Why would you make that statement when you're one of the players who is standing out? It's hard to judge the alignment of the players who are standing out the most. I think each player has their own particular playstyle. I have noticed that some people, no matter if they are town or scum, they tend to lurk. Others will be loud no matter what.ChocolateAttack wrote: Smart towns usually lay loy and try to pin down one or two scum with most accurate evidence then they will start to show themselve. Try to too stand out is not likely to be something a protown would do.
It's very hard to separate people into camps on Day 1. Day 1 is important though. Once people start dying, we'll know their alignment and be able to look back at Day 1 for voting patterns, etc.-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
ChocolateAttack wrote:Sorry for took this long to make another post but i try my best already. Anyway, nice that we moving out of the random voting stage. I think ChronX action is explainable and i think he is town. On another hand, shaft.ed logic is weak and hasty so i will place my vote on Shaft.ed for now.
vote:Shaft.ed
CA I just saw you pointed out that I hadn't responded to your vote. Didn't realize I hadn't as I got a couple FoS rebuttals in. I agree with you that my logic was weak and hasty. But it was the best reasoning I could see for voting for anyone at the time. Noone else had done anything I found remotely strange and I thought the vote could aid in moving us out of the random stages as it seems to have pretty well.ChocolateAttack wrote:but till this point, he hasn't make a response to my vote-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
Who was this in response to btw? Scum genearlly like to point out broad and obvious game strategy in the hopes of coming off more pro-town. (And yes I note the hilarity in me making a broad and obvious game strategy statement).theopor_COD wrote:Scum like to appear pro-town it's their aim somewhat.
unvote
Re-reading.-
-
ChocolateAttack Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 250
- Joined: July 14, 2007
I have another question for you. If you say you voted for Chronx to move our game out of random stage, then is that what Chronx trying to do?shaft.ed wrote: CA I just saw you pointed out that I hadn't responded to your vote. Didn't realize I hadn't as I got a couple FoS rebuttals in. I agree with you that my logic was weak and hasty. But it was the best reasoning I could see for voting for anyone at the time. Noone else had done anything I found remotely strange and I thought the vote could aid in moving us out of the random stages as it seems to have pretty well.-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
I've already made this abundantly clear. Step 1) I saw game possibly moving out of random stage, Step 2) I saw ChronX bandwagoning with slightly faulty logic, Step 3) I thought pressuring ChronX could be a good way to move out of the random stage and possibly gain some insights into ChronX alignment. Step 3 was fortunate enough to have yielded the former, but I don't think I produced much on the latter. In conclusion, just because ChronX wanted to move out of the random stage, doesn't mean I should agree with or trust him.ChocolateAttack wrote: I have another question for you. If you say you voted for Chronx to move our game out of random stage, then is that what Chronx trying to do?-
-
theopor_COD PhD'oh!
-
-
ChocolateAttack Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 250
- Joined: July 14, 2007
1) u saw the game could possibly moving out of random stage? Between u and Chronx, who saw this game could move our of random stage first?shaft.ed wrote:
I've already made this abundantly clear. Step 1) I saw game possibly moving out of random stage, Step 2) I saw ChronX bandwagoning with slightly faulty logic, Step 3) I thought pressuring ChronX could be a good way to move out of the random stage and possibly gain some insights into ChronX alignment. Step 3 was fortunate enough to have yielded the former, but I don't think I produced much on the latter. In conclusion, just because ChronX wanted to move out of the random stage, doesn't mean I should agree with or trust him.ChocolateAttack wrote: I have another question for you. If you say you voted for Chronx to move our game out of random stage, then is that what Chronx trying to do?
2) Chronx bandwagoning is slightly faulty logic? Chronx didn't even have a reason for vote on Aoiqwe. He said he did that to move thing along. So you think something wrong here?
3) This, i can't argue but i willFOSyou though.
Unvote[/b]-
-
shaft.ed dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- dem.agogue
- Posts: 4998
- Joined: August 15, 2007
- Location: St. Louis
1) Does is matter? If you want to know the exact moment of transition, I'd put it at Dasquian's vote for aioqwe as he is the first to state "to move things along."ChocolateAttack wrote: 1) u saw the game could possibly moving out of random stage? Between u and Chronx, who saw this game could move our of random stage first?
2) Chronx bandwagoning is slightly faulty logic? Chronx didn't even have a reason for vote on Aoiqwe. He said he did that to move thing along. So you think something wrong here?
3) This, i can't argue but i will FOS you though.
2) It's slightly faulty because he reasons a) a bandwagon is needed to move the game along, b) 3 votes on Dasquian would constitute a bandwagon therefore c) voting Dasquian would create a bandwagon to move the game forward. What he didn't point out was that aioqwe already had three votes following Dasquian's vote one of which was ChronX's. As I've said this is slightly faulty logic, but not completely. And it indicates that ChronX would rather Dasquian be pressured early than aioqwe, thus the vote switch could be seen as a slightly protective play. Don't really know why you're having trouble wrapping your head around this one.
3) OK-
-
ChocolateAttack Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 250
- Joined: July 14, 2007
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.