VOTE: wooperIn post 99, Wooper wrote::!:In post 97, Fishy Logic wrote:In post 88, Wooper wrote:I hate that there's scum in nahdia/skitter:?:
-D
- wooooper
yes; still don't think 50 is town indicative but ur long post isIn post 129, Fishy Logic wrote:have you circled back to 81 yet
in a vacuum I still don't think this is particularly shocking for either alignment on page 1 no - sorry if that's disappointingIn post 130, hari wrote:it is strange to me that you think nahdia and skitter's conversation about whether or not it is scummy to prepare an opening post is not alignment indicative when nahdia chose fishy logic's post specifically when they could have applied the same logic to scumread other posts and chose not to.
to unvote fishy while I processed my feelingsIn post 130, hari wrote:why did you vote bugspray?
still don't think this is a strong indicator of alignment for ppl w experience levels around myself or nahdia's, taking a stance gets things moving :/In post 133, skitter30 wrote:taking a p2 stance and pushing something that i felt weird
Hrrrnnggg???In post 136, votato wrote:olorin is town.
can u just like talk about how you're scum reading me for a minute bc I seem to float thru your solves but I'm not actually seeing anything from your brainIn post 136, votato wrote:im starting to feel like nahdia is bait and wooper is scum with bugspray (that scumread on bug is pure sheeping the D)
....... wait whatIn post 138, votato wrote:i dont see scum making that claim so early. its potentially verifiable and will lead to wayyyy too much scrutiny in subsequent days. unless scum has watering abilities and can prevent the IC trigger.
i like youIn post 146, hari wrote:i think it is not alignment indicative. hectic's claim was partially true in mystery box hate and it is possible that olorin' s claim is truthful here but that doesn't seem super likely to me.In post 143, skitter30 wrote:i'm not sure why it being similar to his claim from last time would indicate that it's not town-indicative
yes thisIn post 149, hari wrote:i think the similarities make it less likely to be true here and that it isn't scum indicative for hectic to fake claim at the start of a game as he has done so in multiple games. sometimes i am busy and sometimes i do not see something i would like to comment on.In post 144, votato wrote:yeah it does. you think similar entry ergo hectic alt and similar claim ergo riding off of true claim last game to fake-claim this game? whats the point in fake-claiming like that in post 0? and why are you lurking?
HUH?????????????????? who?????????????????? Do we know each other? Or are you just a fan of my oeuvre. Either way fineIn post 18, hari wrote:adapting this logic for myself in order to VOTE: hellbooks.
Hush!!! keep it on the DL!!!!
yes!!!In post 23, bugspray wrote:anyone down to policy lynch alts
Feels like a weird buddying attemptIn post 39, Fishy Logic wrote:in my head i'm thinking "you're taking vague scumtells and applying them to rvs when they probably shouldn't be applied there"
i reload the page and see skitt's post saying exactly that
is it too early to start townreading skitter
-D
really towny?
Feels like a towny response.In post 85, skitter30 wrote:ooh this'll be fun
Good luck.In post 101, Nahdia wrote:anyway gotta dash. got a job interview.
Oh oh put me in coach. i will state that it just makes sense to believe the claim unless like a concerning amount of time passes with it being unsubstantiated (the claim itself sort of feels like a promise that it will eventually be substantiated). Alignment wise, yeah. medium town equity I think.In post 130, hari wrote:what did you think of olorin's opening?
In agreeance, assuming that the long post was the one where they went and responded to every page 1 post or something and was like "ope! people are voting me! whoa!" which just seems rather baldfaced for scum.In post 180, Wooper wrote:yes; still don't think 50 is town indicative but ur long post is
I feel like confusing thoughts which make sense are probably somewhat more likely to be real but it's still a bit mechanical for me to have a strong hair readIn post 153, skitter30 wrote:that was a ... very confusing way to try to say that
I call to veto the ic discussion unless we decide to lunch orionlotionIn post 157, skitter30 wrote:i feel like if olorin doesn't walk back the claim it's probably townie because taht's a p ~bold~ claim to make as scum (i.e. specifically the potential to become ic bit)
can we hang out... maybe grab a coffee or feed some dukcs...In post 161, hari wrote:i guess i don't understand why you (and others) are so willing to accept that the claim is truthful, but this probably isn't alignment indicative as i've had prior experience with hectic making a claim of this sort and it being generally met with acceptance. i have been viewing it very similarly to fishy logic's post (as a prepared opener) instead of as a real claim.In post 158, Nahdia wrote:pretty much exactly what votato and skitter have said. likely comes from town. if he is scum, the dehydrated claim is likely still true, though perhaps not with the same outcomes. cant see scum fakeclaiming something reliant on another role like that.
I think my posts are insightful and lucidIn post 179, bugspray wrote:Stopped reading mod page 5 because fuck wooper posts they are too long and don't say shit
hahaha ya the passive aggressionIn post 186, hellbooks wrote:In agreeance, assuming that the long post was the one where they went and responded to every page 1 post or something and was like "ope! people are voting me! whoa!" which just seems rather baldfaced for scum.
So is dune but that didn't stop me from my reading it because it was so boringIn post 190, Wooper wrote:I think my posts are insightful and lucidIn post 179, bugspray wrote:Stopped reading mod page 5 because fuck wooper posts they are too long and don't say shit
Its almost like scum me would have voted Vota for not putting out an rvs vote, and then made noise about how avoiding rvs is scummy and only scummy scummers avoid rvs. Weird, i should take notes for next time so i can play better as scum, I am fucking this one up from the get go.In post 31, skitter30 wrote:in fact i almost think it comes from town more than scum
(not that i think it's inherently townie but the examples i remember offhand seem to have been done by townies)
Why? I don't disagree, but I want to see if im seeing what youre seeing, or if youre blinded by the glint of your horn.
Can you link to where this popped up in a game to make you feel this way?In post 34, Nahdia wrote:eh, ive had the opposite experience. at least that's my memory of it anyway.
While that may be true, scum normally arent the trendsetters in the game because they need to wait and see what the majority of town does before they can id their targets for a mislynch. Like me not questioning Votas lack of an RVS vote, and the lack of a mention on the claim that really doesnt need to be mentioned are both things that scum would have jumped on to muddy the waters and just fling shit to see what stuck. I took the approach I normally do in games and I'm surprised that more people aren't aware of it and still let me get away with it.In post 36, Nahdia wrote:restated, my point is that scum tend to overthink and overprepare, whereas town act more "off-the-cuff".
Nah, shes a good egg to have around as town, i dont know if ive seen her as scum before.
This donkey speaks the truth. You can find it unfunny, but that doesnt make it scummy.In post 45, votato wrote:except another scumtell is not being able to pick up on or appreciate humor, especially rvs humor.
Are you the thought police? In what world do we have to defend what we choose to give our attention to, and especially to you, who has done less then most have in the game at this point?In post 48, Wooper wrote:do you seriously have so few other thoughts that this feels important rn?
i was literally just curious if it was an RVS vote or if you had a reason for it.In post 197, Fishy Logic wrote:25 Im curious why this vote from us got your ire up while you ignored the rest of the RANDOM voting during the RANDOM VOTING STAGE of the game. Its weird, almost like if you were able to read contextually you could form your own opinion on things and not have to have it spoon fed to you. Would also help if you didn't make naked votes in rvs which are to be assumed to be random as well since you didnt state a reason and then turn around and ask us to explain a vote much like yours. Just saying, whats good for the goose and all.
