13p Normal [TM2015]
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
what exactly don't you understand about it? since Mala got no result and thus knew she got RB'ed immediately after N1 ended, she would knowin advance before claiming her targetthat her action wouldn't have shown up. I don't know what you don't get about this.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
except RB'd actions not being on tracker/watcher reports is, as I said, common knowledge
you don't have to look up anything on the wiki to be aware of it. I for one definitely knew about it, but wasn't aware of x-shot roles getting their shots refunded not being normal - and this was the case without me looking up either roleblocker or "Normal" on the wiki-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
and even if it *wasn't* necessarily common knowledge, it's still a bad assumption to make
like seriously, think about it more. you're attempting to clear SK here and it's based around the assumption that MALA WOULDN'T HAVE KNOWN HOW ROLE INTERACTIONS WORK. did it never occur to you that's a really dangerous assumption you have to make in order to clear someone?-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I really don't see how it's risky? in her case, it's not like she actually did anything to him, or was even capable of doing anything to him in the first place (given you can't just shoot someone, whereas you can, for example, make up a cop report which can then be confirmed/disproven). as I said, I don't really have any data on it, but I would expect that there is no risk in claiming an action on a scum partner for her claim here.
I'll elaborate on some of the stuff that pinged us later. it's 5 PM and I'm still half-asleep -.--
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
fucking lol'd
seriously, your attitude is among the worst I've ever seen. I've never seen anyone who can create this kind of a toxic atmosphere in a game where we've lynched scum on D1 _and_ D2, explicitly IN RESPONSE to the scum lynches occurring.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
sthar apparently doesn't like the way I push lynches, or the way I argue, or something along those lines
discounting the fact that the way I pushed Mala D2 was a pretty huge factor in getting her lynched when she almost certainly wouldn't have been at that point otherwise
In post 1851, Zachrulez wrote:I'm assuming because there isn't a real interest in lynching him there's some reason he's town that I'm missing though?
I don't really think his play D1 comes from scum. he would have been bussing Thor at a point where it doesn't make much sense to do so. I also say his frustration here (while completely fucking dumb) is genuine. in particular, his posts near the end of D2. he complained really loudly that I was strong arming the Mala lynch through, but I'm fairly sure he was aware the way he was doing it would have about a 0% chance of actually derailing the lynch, and thus that it'd make him look really bad if Mala flipped scum.
essentially, scum-him would need just about as much credibility as possible, but the way he did it had the effect of destroying it all, and I think he'd be aware of this and thus play it more carefully if he was scum here
more recently, I also like his defense of jason/your slot, given I'm pretty sure your slot was the scum-designated mislynch until it got derailed-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
these are the SK posts that we were looking at:
In post 787, SleepyKrew wrote:Well shit deadline's probably going to hit before I wake up and I'm still not right in the head. I think a TH lynch is the best viable option. Going to go pull up the stuff that set my teammates' scumdars off.
initially attempting to push TH over Thor D1.
In post 792, SleepyKrew wrote:Fuccccckkkkkk that Nacho read stuff
mastin thinks this looks like "crap, my buddy messed up" - in response to me agreeing with TH's angle that Thor was BS'ing reads from his teammates
In post 897, SleepyKrew wrote:That leaves Egg, Delta, Boon, Vyse, and Mala.
Based on a quick check, Boonskies never talked to or mentioned Thor at all. Not even at the end of the Day, after Trojan caught Thor in a lie.
Egg's vote felt so fucking scummy when I read it.
Vyse, null.
Delta, null.
In post 846, Malakittens wrote:I made my stance clear. I'm not risking lynching a claimed PR on D1. Too much risk; not much profit (unless thor is scum).
I hate hate hate hate hate hate hate this post.
In post 898, SleepyKrew wrote:Right now, I want an Egg or Boon lynch. Fielders' choice.
this looks inconsistent:
"Egg, Delta, Boon, Vyse, Mala!"
Boon not mention Thor, Vyse/Delta null, Egg fucking scummy, *hate* Mala's post here.
*ignores Mala*
Egg or Boon!
/golfclap
In post 1555, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 1554, Boonskiies wrote:Also, I don't realize how I'm playing bad this game...besides my self-meta, I feel I'm playing pretty solid.
didn't vote Thor, didn't vote Mala, avoiding voting Bins
VOTE: Bins
voting Bins while posturing to lynch Boon the next day (today). this sort of open-ended play is typical of scum who need a bunch of mislynches to nagivate endgame.
In post 1607, SleepyKrew wrote:...
I could see scum jason making this play
But that would require jason to be scum
:/
.
.
.
In post 1632, SleepyKrew wrote:I'm just having a REALLY hard time believing that jason is this bad
this reads to me like scum attempting to soft-push a mislynch (jason/Zach-slot) without actually being on the wagon. the first post is really eh - I don't really know what the point of it is besides attempting to keep the status quo re: focus/paranoia on jason without actually accomplishing anything. he questions jason for a few posts after this and pretty blatantly calls jason scum in the second post, but doesn't actually commit to a scum read on him. I think the best motivation for this is that *if* there turns out not to be momentum for a jason lynch, he can easily back off and not really be tied to the wagon (Egg gets all the fall for it). he doesn't want to commit to a scum read on jason bc he'd look like obvscum if people quit being idiotic and realize that jason has to be town here.
In post 1741, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 1739, Egg wrote:Zach, so you swapped in to defend yourself better than Jason was? It seems like a survivalistic move to me.
HOLY SHIT
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Egg
In post 1744, SleepyKrew wrote:P sure safeclaims are explicitly non-Normal.
That Egg post is terrible and opportunistic and scummy and awful. I'll explain later today/tomorrow.
while this isn't scummy by itself, this is consistent with the above quote: setting Egg up to take the fall for the jason wagon. and the thing is, this is yet another place where he's blatantly leaving himself a bunch of lynch options open. he has Egg here, and is *again* setting up Boon to be lynched the next day (tomorrow) with posts like 1701, 1713, among others:
In post 1701, SleepyKrew wrote:do you think Boon would play scum predictably or logically
In post 1713, SleepyKrew wrote:White knighting and buddying are both things and they're both actual terms and they're different please don't try to be haughty and smart when actually you have no clue what you're talking about
I don't really get the impression he cares about forming reads or getting his strongest scum read lynched. I get the impression he's playing a survival game here.
[line]
everything up to the 4th point (lining up Bins/Boon D3) is stuff mastin pointed out in our team PT a while back that I didn't point out bc there were more relevant things to discuss. everything after that is moreso stuff I've noticed about his recent play.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
o geez, I screwed that post in multiple places. anyway
@sthar: I'm looking through your Egg case now and while I don't agree with 100% of it, I think other parts of it are compelling. if you're actually going to give a shit, I'll elaborate on the parts I disagree with, but it's rather pointless to do this when you're just going to ignore everything I say anyway-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1861, SleepyKrew wrote:I really hope I don't have to explain why I did each and every one of those things as town
Some of them should be really obvious and I'm kinda annoyed that pie isn't (visibly) considering them and it's rubbing me the wrong way but like, piecannotbe scum.
at this point, it's not so much about specific posts as it is about the overall narrative of the game. I don't think any of it is 100% strong or anything and I'm not sure whether the last scum is you or Egg. but regardless, if someone appears to be lining a bunch of people up when scum need 3 mislynches to win, you have to consider that it might be coming from scum, regardless of what the specific reasoning behind it is-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
the other thing I'm wondering is if there is literally any way at all sthar can be scum here
bc if there's not, I would feel 100% comfortable just autolynching SK -> Egg -> Boon (not caring about order except I'd want Boon last) since I have I WILL EAT YOU IF YOU LYNCH THESE PEOPLE level town reads on everyone else in the game
overall I feel too many things just don't make any sense at all with sthar as scum, which makes me think I can upgrade him as well
(this is not me calling sthar scum for anyone watching, it's just me wanting to figure out if he's 95% town or 100% town)-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
(I'm saying I'd bet the game on all of {you, Zach, DW} being town and that it doesn't matter who specifically we lynch if we get one more town read and can all agree on said town reads, since there's only 3 people left. this is different from trying to spread suspicion around on multiple people at the same time)-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1881, Zachrulez wrote:Needed to bring this up since Pie is arguing that Delta is town and should never be lynched.
I'm townreading DW for a few reasons:
1. his attitude towards Thor lynch was essentially "fuck you all for lynching a PR" which both me and mastin think is town. more elaboration on this in 1089 - it makes even more sense when you consider his team thought Thor was 1-shot cop fake claiming hider.
2. Mala kept pushing him from the start of D2 with a really shallow case - it read a lot more like scum making a shallow push on town than scum bussing a partner. I don't really think that interaction makes sense as scum x scum.
plus I haven't really found anything about his play scummy.
(either way, I agree trying to pre-plan all the lynches is rather pointless, and everyone would have to agree to it first. it was more for my own thoughts/consolidation)
In post 1882, Trojan Horse wrote:Three thoughts from Tammy:
1. Tammy told me about a game she played with Mala, where Mala went after a particular player because their RVS vote turned out to be a scum. Because of that, Tammy doesn't think Mala would vote her scummate during RVS (i.e. Tammy thinks SK is town).
2. Mala claimed to have shot SK night 1, but that wasn't really consistent with her earlier reads. Tammy thinks that Mala just forgot her read on SK... but she wouldn't have forgotten her read if SK was her scummate.
re 1: I'm not sure how Mala not voting her scum partner would follow from her pushing someone for RVS'ing her partner in a different game. are you sure that isn't just a coincidence and it's entirely unrelated to this?
re 2: it not being consistent with her reads indicates that either she forgot her read on SK, or........ she just BS'ed a shot on her partner bc she saw it fit later to distance. I think this makes as much sense with SK-scum as it does with SK-town.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1879, Trojan Horse wrote:I don't see any post from day 3 on where SK was trying to push a Boon lynch. He has complained about Boon playing badly, but that's not the same as trying to push a Boon lynch.
disagree. him pointing out Boon is playing badly for being off both scum could just as easily be used as an attack later e.g. "you avoided both scum wagons". and his posts today could pretty easily be used to posture for an attack on Boon as well - even if there's no actual push to get Boon lynched, there's a lot of weak jabs and potshots towards him.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1885, pieguyn wrote:1. his attitude towards Thor lynch was essentially "fuck you all for lynching a PR" which both me and mastin think is town. more elaboration on this in 1089 - it makes even more sense when you consider his team thought Thor was 1-shot cop fake claiming hider.
more on this, compare DW's behavior re: Thor lynch to, ex. Mala's in posts like 833
it's night and day. Mala knows Thor is scum and is acting all wishy-washy and apologetic over voting the counterwagon, bc she knows people will be looking at it if Thor ever flips and she's worried that by just acting naturally she'll draw suspicion. DW, on the other hand, doesn't give a shit. rather than trying to use the situation to his advantage, what he did comes off as someone genuinely thinking it's a shit idea not to lynch a PR on D1 and not understanding why Thor is getting lynched.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
more thoughts from mastin:
mastin thinks scum would be more likely to back off the jason push when it became likely it wouldn't go through, as opposed to continuing to force it through. as a result, we basically agree on SK's recent play. compare this:
In post 1624, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 1623, jasonT1981 wrote:If STD was serious when he said he was going to block me...
THERES YER PROBLEM
In post 1630, SleepyKrew wrote:You're explaining why you considered STD scum a possibility
You're not explaining why you decided that possibility was more likely than STD being town
In post 1632, SleepyKrew wrote:I'm just having a REALLY hard time believing that jason is this bad
In post 1635, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 1633, DeltaWave wrote:Wouldn't it have made more sense for scum Jason to say that STD blocked him?
That would require us to believe that STD is an idiot
all of these say he should be voting, but he's not. then:
In post 1698, SleepyKrew wrote:oh right jason has to be town because of balance
What's this about an unclaimed PR?
Anyway like I said earlier claiming to have been blocked would require us to believe that STD is an idiot but it's irrelevant because balance. I just want STD to know he's not an idiot.
In post 1734, SleepyKrew wrote:Still think you're town because setup spec
I can see that jason was getting frustrated so I don't think you're lying about why the swap happened.
the awkward transition when it becomes obvious jason is not scum. then:
In post 1741, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 1739, Egg wrote:Zach, so you swapped in to defend yourself better than Jason was? It seems like a survivalistic move to me.
HOLY SHIT
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Egg
pushing the new easy target.
TO:
In post 1608, Egg wrote:Jason ISO:
Spoiler: WALL
So............................
Originally, I thought I remembered him not being likely scum because of Thor interactions. But looking back, the only reason to think this is if you think Thor wouldn't bus. And...he would. So. That being said, there were a few town looking things in here. I don't really think they outweigh the fact that he avoided the Thor wagon after the claim and the Mala wagon completely while even agreeing with the points against the claim. Also, this is Mod WIFOM, but I'm not sure I buy a RB+BG setup. Most Mods use a RB instead of a protective role or view it as a protective role because it can stop kills. Not protecting STD is kinda BS too.
Vote Jason
Preview edit: After I submit, I'll look for STD saying he was blocking you. You'd actually be clear if he did.
actually putting legwork into forming an opinion, and backing it up with evidence.
In post 1676, Egg wrote:In post 1664, jasonT1981 wrote:
It kinda did. It was me mostly, then Thor.
Therewagons appeared briefly on Boon and Trojan that mostly didn't get of the ground (gotta double check Trojan though) but for the most part, it seemed like only Thor or myself were seriously considered and pushed.were
Um, what? How is this anything but a scum claim? Lol (And further reading shows Trojan pointed this out already...)
mastin thought this ^ in particular read genuine
In post 1742, Egg wrote:Do you disagree? I mean if Jason was getting emotional as a town bodyguard, one successful protect results in his death anyway or one correct lynch ends the game. I don't see any reason why a town bodyguard would resort to swapping out over getting emotional.
continuing to push jason/Zach as scum even despite the fact it's obvious at this point they won't get lynched.
the difference here is, again, night and day. Egg actually believes jason is scum here, and is trying to see to it that either he gets jason/Zach lynched or is otherwise convinced he's not scum. Egg's actions don't fit the profile of what scum would be likely to do here: he's still pushing Zach despite the fact that he gets nothing out of it (Zach isn't getting lynched, ever). on the other hand, SK is pushing easy targets and going with the flow of whoever people are suspecting at the time, without committing to a firm stance on any of it (see: the vast number of posts where he spreads suspicion about jason/Zach without pushing it).
it's as I alluded to earlier. SK is playing a survival game here.
she also wants to reemphasize this:
In post 1841, pieguyn wrote:except RB'd actions not being on tracker/watcher reports is, as I said, common knowledge
you don't have to look up anything on the wiki to be aware of it. I for one definitely knew about it, but wasn't aware of x-shot roles getting their shots refunded not being normal - and this was the case without me looking up either roleblocker or "Normal" on the wiki
she says (speaking as a Normal reviewer, and one who was involved with the decision to make x-shot roles not have their shots refunded normal) that roleblockers' targets not visiting has been the standard practice for a very long time, and that it is indeed common knowledge.
on the other hand, x-shots not getting refunds was a debated topic, and one that only reached a conclusion *very* recently (days before the conception of this game).
ergo, Mala would know she wouldn't visit (bc that's how it was ever since she joined), but not that x-shots wouldn't get refunds, as it's a recent change.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
she also tells both@Egg(re: 1797) that she's busting her ass trying to save his - and that, as mastin and I have shared most of the reads over the course of this game, her reads have been equally solid to mine. in other words, to sheep her. ~
and@Boon(re: 1799) that this is even more so the case for him bc I was thinking Boon was scum and she was the one who kept convincing me over and over that he was, in fact, town.
Egg is town, SK is scum.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1890, sthar8 wrote:Pie, go ahead and tell me what your reservations are on Egg. If I were ignoring everything you say, I certainly wouldn't be getting as frustrated as I have.
this will likely come tomorrow, depending on whether I can get through it before I pass out. it's 5 AM .-.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1890, sthar8 wrote:Pie, go ahead and tell me what your reservations are on Egg. If I were ignoring everything you say, I certainly wouldn't be getting as frustrated as I have.
In post 1786, sthar8 wrote:Egg's day1 play was very hedgy. Not the 'I dunno what's going on' hedgy, but the 'I'm not sure I want this opinion on record' kind. Here, it's specifically 'hey pie lets be friends, but leave my buddy thor alone. unless he flips, then there was something weird about that guy all along.'
I don't really think this is scummy. a lot of the time, this just ends up being a coincidence more than anything (similar to what I said earlier in the game about someone ignoring scum never seems to actually make it more likely they're scum with them). off the top of my head, I know Micc did something similar near game start and was town - it's not exactly the same, but there's still him having a few vague thoughts but not having a read either way.
In post 430, Micc wrote:Going to ammend that to quickly skimming and posting.
People keep stressing that I get more involved and then not commenting on the posts I do make. Scum points for them even though I cant remember who it was off the top of my head.
Thor push feels decent, but thats mostly me looking at the Jason wagon and thinking this is how scum Thor pushes mislynches and knowing that i always find myself on scum-Thor lead mislynches. Tbh i barely even skimmed through most of pie's posts at the end because i wanted to get to writting instead of reading.
Sthar is voting Egg. Id like to see that explained sooner rather than later.
Deltawave i think your case on STD is bad. The over justification reasoning is you pushing him for a playstyle thing.
I dislike Trojan horse more and more with every catchup i make. Cant pick out why.
Unvote: Jason
I saw the words intent to hammer and claim at some point, so this is me making it clear that im no where near ready for that. Give me tomorrow to travel back to school and watch basketball, then after that i promise to be off the post every ~48 hours activity cycle.
In post 1786, sthar8 wrote:Note this is a flashwagon anywhere but Thor.
with this point, I still don't really understand what exactly you think he was trying to do. what scum would put all the effort into saving their partner - and then, when deadline hits and their partner isn't getting lynched, go "fuck it" and hammer him anyway?
I still don't really think the way he went about it makes sense coming from scum.
In post 1786, sthar8 wrote:There's quite a bit of Egg arguing irrelevant theory like this.
I'm not seeing why this is scummy, either - I only really think arguing theory is scummy if it's accompanied with a distinct lack of scumhunting, as this generally happens when scum are looking for an easy way to coast. I personally think Egg has done a fair amount of scum hunting so far, although you probably disagree. (plus, in this case, the theory Egg was arguing was neither irrelevant nor incorrect, it's what I've been saying this whole time - no lynch on D1 is functionally the same thing as a mislynch from a scum POV.)
In post 1786, sthar8 wrote:But he did spend Day2 trying to get everyone else to give him a reason not to vote mala.
I don't see the same scum intent here you do. to be fair, Egg had a pretty developed scum read on Boon at this point in the game and this was in response to my 1094 which was primarily inconsistencies in what Boon was thinking as opposed to anything that needed both Boon and Mala to be scum in order to work.
it makes equally as much sense IMO that this is coming from town-Egg thinking Boon is scum trying to convince me to join him on Boon, rather than scum-Egg searching for reasons to not vote his partner. I'm not sure what in here you think is explicitly more likely to come from scum than town in this position.
that's not to say I think he's town for this post, just that it doesn't make him scum and that if I scum read him it'd be for other reasons
In post 1786, sthar8 wrote:'Can we ignore the fact that jason is an uncountered protective claim and lynch him anyway?'
I think the push on jason actually looks town, for behavioral reasons explained in my recent posts.
I think if you want to look at the people who attemped to lynch jason today, SK is a way better candidate - for how he softly pushed jason without taking a firm stance on the matter, and then backed off as soon as it became obvious I wasn't letting jason get lynched that day and went to push the next easiest target (Egg) instead.
and you have to admit that despite thinking Egg is scum, there is a *lot* of suspicion on him right now - you, I to some extent was thinking Egg might be scum although I'm rapidly being convinced it's just SK, and most of the people off the wagon would likely vote there - so he would be a very easy target to push *if* he is town here.
the remaining points I think are OK, just at this point I think there's way more evidence for SK being scum.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1896, Trojan Horse wrote:Tammy's reply: she thinks that if a person catches scum because scum did X, then that person is less likely to do X as scum, for fear of getting caught himself/herself.
eeeehhhh
I don't really agree with this. it could just as easily be that she thinks scum are more likely to do X explicitly *because* it's something she'd be more likely to do as scum, as opposed to less. either way I don't really think reading into it much is a good idea
In post 1896, Trojan Horse wrote:pie, I have a question for you: you've said that sthar's vote of Thor day 1 was unlikely to be a bus. Why don't you feel the same way about SK's vote of Mala day 2?
mostly the timing of it
when sthar voted Thor it was basically just me and STD who were suspecting Thor and that was all there was to it - no one else was interested in wagoning him. sthar's vote served to give the wagon the momentum it needed to actually become a viable lynch, at a point where it was (as STD said) dead in the water. if he didn't vote it, I probably couldn't have got it lynched
on the other hand, there was a lot of general suspicion directed towards Mala on D2, plus I was pushing her a lot harder than I pushed Thor. I likely would have been able to lynch her, or get her relatively close to being lynched, without his vote. it would make sense he would vote her sooner rather than later as scum in order to get the most town cred possible off it.
I do take the Mala vote as a minor point in his favor, but at this point POE points to him and I (and mastin) have stronger evidence for him being scum.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1904, Egg wrote:I'm with Pie on most of the Mala stuff, but this is actually a fair point from sthar. If mala didn't know a tracker couldn't catch her in a lie, she'd probably still claim her real target.
no, it isn't. and even if it was, it's correct that it's still a bad assumption to make
mastin points out that you are likely getting lynched today if SK doesn't happen. join me on SK?
In post 1906, Boonskiies wrote:Pie's list is going to crap. The skrew case is fine, but egg/myself are Towny mc town town. My teammates feel egg is scum, but pie is the one who convinced me that egg was town. Wtf.
???
I have both of you as town. if you meant my one post, that's me saying mastin wants both of you to sheep her.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1907, sthar8 wrote:Really? Has anyone ever encountered a game in which a RB-d power got their shot back? I thought they were about the same level of logical.
no, they're not
mastin told me to tell you to go [expletive] yourself over this, btw. there is a distinct difference, which she actually argued with N about, but got overruled on:
-if a RB prevents the action from happening, the player gets a refund bc the action never happened. she used this in Maniacal Street Mafia.
-if a RB makes an action fail, the player doesn't get a refund bc they did use it, it just failed
she got overruled on this for simplicity's sake, and wanted this explanation to be included on the wiki, but it got left out
either way, it doesn't change the fact that blocked players not visiting has been the long-standing principle since well before Mala even joined the site - and thus that it would be common knowledge - nor the fact that it's a really shit assumption for clearing someone
In post 1907, sthar8 wrote:It's not that the thoughts are vague and the read isn't there, it's how formulaic it is. He had a ton of 'here's a reason i think they're scum, here's a reason I think they're town.' I could see that indecision coming up a little, but he had that on a bunch of different players. I think he was trying to play both sides of the field in case of future flips.
the obvious conclusion here is that it's more based on playstyle than anything alignment-indicative
I know for a fact that I do this all the time as town (see: that jason case I made near the start of this game which you scum read me for, as one example, but it happens a lot in my town games). some players consider it better to objectively take into account all the evidence, going both ways, when forming reads.
In post 1907, sthar8 wrote:It fits with the hammer being a frustration move. He tried all the subtle ways to move the wagon, bringing in new suspects, trying for a flashwagon, waving about deadline paranoia. Then town still didn't move, and he's stuck having been a big detractor from a scumwagon that was either going to go through then, or be the obvious wagon the next day. If we no-lynched and hit thor the next day, everybody knows he was around at deadline and refused to hammer, coupled with trying to derail the wagon earlier.
except if it *did* go through the next day, the way he was arguing against it wouldn't have been scummy
he had already made it clear that he had no interest in lynching Thor on D1. not hammering Thor isn't inconsistent with this. there is nothing about that series of events that would have been more likely to come from scum than town - it either would have been town-Egg who in this case happened to be wrong (and hey, even *if* Egg is scum here, DW would have had basically the exact same stance as town? so this is testimony to what I'm saying here) or scum-Egg not hammering a partner. there's nothing scummy there.
and besides, it's not even a given that Thor would have been wagoned on D2 - it is likely he could have came back, posted up a storm, and got out of it, especially if they killed someone like STD or me N1 instead of Fenchurch
and additionally, the other problem with this is what I've been saying this whole time: no lynch for scum on D1 is fundamentally the same as a mislynch. if Egg was trying to get a mislynch in, he wouldn't have had any problem just letting the day run into a NL - and if Egg *did* get a mislynch in, everything you're saying about him would apply on D2 anyway.
attempting to derail the Thor lynch and not hammering him at deadline are one and the same. it's idiotic scum play to behave otherwise
In post 1907, sthar8 wrote:My opinion is the opposite. Jason-lynch would be a huge victory for scum. If it were me I would never have let up on a PR mistake here. It's easy to justify and the value is huge compared to the risk.
OK
so
suppose Egg is scum here and is trying to force the jason lynch through. now look at what's going on in the game.
jason has a total of..... 0..... votes on him. oh wait, Egg isn't even voting jason. really good job forcing that mislynch through there, amirite?
and on top of that, basically everyone in the game is now reading jason-slot as town - so, how does scum-Egg intend on getting 5 votes out of basically nowhere to lynch jason, and to what extent is he trying to convince people over this?
also, even if what you're saying was correct, I happen to think that "attempting to force an important mislynch through, and then awkwardly backtracking on it when it becomes obvious it won't happen and that you'll be placed under scrutiny - from people like yourself - for continuing to push it" is more scummy than "attempting to force an important mislynch through and not letting up on it"
In post 1907, sthar8 wrote:Sure. If egg were town being the key assumption here.
if you're going to consider that anyone else is scum, you can assume Egg is town for it, since there's only 1 scum left-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
some people think SK is town bc of Mala claiming to target him - which is objectively wrong and I do not want people operating under that assumption
unless you mean my post towards sthar, in which case it's just bc I don't think Egg is scum-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1922, Trojan Horse wrote:From the end of day 1, when the lynch was obviously going to be Thor or me:
In post 787, SleepyKrew wrote:Well shit deadline's probably going to hit before I wake up and I'm still not right in the head. I think a TH lynch is the best viable option. Going to go pull up the stuff that set my teammates' scumdars off.
In post 789, SleepyKrew wrote:Also Quil said the way Trojan went about his early interactions with me (about me not RVSing) reminded him of scum Trojan, and Reck was on board with that.
In post 790, SleepyKrew wrote:He said TH likes to strawman as scum, and that the way he was oversimplifying and misrepresenting the game seemed to fit the bill.
At the time, Oversoul told me he thought this looked like SK trying to protect his buddy. When SK switched to Thor, I threw out that theory. Maybe my teammate was right all along, and SK just changed his mind and bussed Thor.
#goodposting-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1923, sthar8 wrote:I'm having a hard time reconciling 'survivalist game' with 'lurking through his own wagon.'
now that he's actually started doing shit, has your opinion here changed?
(also, I think lurking out a wagon through deadline and then posting up a storm *at* deadline is a pretty common scum play, and is something I've seen players like Nacho abuse in several games)-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1949, SleepyKrew wrote:Also to say that my lurking has been part of a scum strategy is to implicitly say that I've been lying about being busy and not feeling well
fuck you
I don't think you're scum for lurking here. my scum read on you comes from other reasons.
just sthar thought you'd attempt to do more in response to the wagon on you if you were scum here, and I was pointing out why I think this is wrong (this was all working under the assumption you actually *were* capable of doing more here)-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
this doesn't really convince me. for a few reasons:
-your town read on Egg came after it became obvious I wasn't letting Egg get lynched today. before that, you were perfectly fine with lynching him. just like how you were soft pushing for jason until it became obvious he wasn't getting lynched, either. I don't really see you legitimately trying to reduce the lynch pool here - you're only eliminating people after it becomes obvious they won't get lynched
-furthermore, you appear to be scum reading Boon now. you've now called jason, Egg, and Boon scum in this day phase, as well as DW. where in here are you trying to reduce the lynch pool or otherwise not calling everyone scummy?
-while I admit pointing out how your reads changed is more about the overall narrative as opposed to specific reasoning, and thus that I really wouldn't expect a specific reply from it, you still took me arguing with sthar and did this whole "fuck you for scum reading me for lurking" in response to it. how the fuck is that not ATE? it actually reminded me a lot of what Mala did when I was pushing her - cherry pick one thing and start ATE'ing in response to it so that people read you as town
I also don't really think you're incapable of rereading the thread to get fake reads as scum (and I don't think this is strictly true, either; I remember it looked like you reread on at least one occasion in Quickness). so, meh.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
on phone, more when I'm back at comp, but one thing first:
am I scum ATEing or am I TOWN THAT IS ACTUALLY MAD?
you're confbiasing so fucking hard here
Why on earth would someone get mad about being implicitly accused of lying about business and health, in more than just this thread too, so they could get away with lurking?
I'm mad at your other reasons for scumreading me because they're wrong. I'm furious about this one because IT'S OUT OF GAME BULLSHIT
you are fucking kidding me. let me make this clear: I DO NOT THINK YOU ARE SCUM FOR "ATE". YOU are the one saying you'd be ATE'ing here if you're scum and that you're town for it bc what you did here wasn't ATE. all I'm saying here is that, no, the way you played this does, in fact, make sense as scum ATE, and thus you saying you're town for it is incorrect
I wouldn't ever push someone as scum for not being engaged in the game when it's just their RL causing it instead.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
vote SK with me, and I'm more than happy to vote Egg tomorrow *if* the game is still going
(I'm blatantly aware how lazy this is and I don't give a shit. I refuse to let Boon get lynched and I would be really fucking surprised if scum is outside {SK, Egg} anyway.)-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I'm about to pass out any second now. there is a nonzero chance I won't be on again before deadline.
do not fucking lynch Boon. SK is the correct lynch. I continue to have no idea why people can think the way he's playing this comes from town. he voted jason after jason fucked up, then moved onto Egg (the next easiest target) after it became obvious jason wasn't getting lynched, and now he moved onto Boon (the next easiest target after Egg) when it became obvious Egg wasn't getting lynched either. it's textbook scum play - and even on top of that, there's evidence elsewhere pointing towards him being scum, plus general POE
don't get paranoid of sthar or DW. both are town.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1990, Egg wrote:Can you remind me why you're so sure Boon is town?
Mala interactions D2 + his recent play doesn't really make sense coming from scum (at least one of the reasons is 1700)-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
can someone remind me if this was finalized before or after the new Normal guidelines
cos I was thinking the only way this makes sense is if the last scum was a traitor instead of a goon, but looking at the page for traitor http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... Guidelines that can't even be correct bc it would have been endgamed by now-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 2046, Boonskiies wrote:As scum, there would be no reason for me to not claim a PR in my position during the mass claim.
:/
I had a paranoid theory about what your scum strategy here would likely be, and I thought you would potentially say something like this if you were following that strategy. I wasn't expecting it to actually happen, though.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 1003, Malakittens wrote:VOTE: DW.
I don't like the whole let's flashwagon Boon. He tried to derail both the TH and the Thor lynch, granted he was in the same boat as me for not wanting to lynch Thor, but there was no reason for him to try derail the TH lynch either like he did. The only reason why he would derail the TH was because he had a higher scumread on Boon. Boon went V/LA, didn't claim. Why was there a sudden push for wanting Boon lynched like ~hours~ before the deadline.
I didn't like it. I'm mainly scumreading Egg for sorta the same reasons.
I'll flesh out my reasons for my townreads later, but they are pretty strong IMO.
so this post has been sitting in the back of my mind all game because it was pretty obviously fabricated and the focus, in particular, struck me as odd - what she was commenting on here really was out of place. the first thing I want to address is that I really do not think Mala thought she would get lynched at this point in time. at this point, the wagon on her looked like this:
Malakittens (3)- Save The Dragons, pieguyn, SleepyKrew
even if she did think she could get out of being lynched here- I think she had planned on pushing DW/Egg in advance. and I really don't think she would have expected STD/me to just push her out the gate like this. ergo, I still don't think she would have thought to distance from her partner in this situation. I think she was just playing straightforwardly, as in, trying to get a mislynch on DW.
but with that out of the way, as I said, the reasoning here really just didn't make any sense. so I couldn't help but think, "why"? why would scum-Mala feel the need to go out of her way to bullshit a push on DW here?
then I looked back through DW's ISO.
Spoiler:
I can't help but think that this was a calculated play to eliminate a threat to the rest of her scum team. I think that she went out of her way to push DW for the express purpose of taking out someone who was scum reading her partner. (you will notice she did the same thing to sthar in 628 - which doesn't mean anything by itself, but it is something that really makes me think this is not too unreasonable here)
and the same thing with Egg. you'll remember Egg had a scum read on Boon for the majority of D1/D2 up to this point
In post 1164, Malakittens wrote:Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
I can finally flesh out my townread more on Boons because the game I was carefully watching just ended.
So the reason why I was against the push in Jason's D1 play and why my townread on Boons strengthened was due to this game. If you read his ISO he was attacked early D1 because of his play. Lurking, not contributing much etc and then later on used for mislynch bait. His reactions that game reminded me of how he reacted here.
so overnight I actually looked at this game and the thing is, Mala's comparison here really is quite shit. for one, I think what she's pointing out here is more of a null tell as opposed to a scum tell - it is not difficult to fake town-looking reactions to pressure as scum. but the thing is, if you look at Boon's ISO in that game, the way he played there was quite different to here. if you want to check this, look through his ISO there and check how he comes out the gate swinging immediately whenever he gets pressured - compare to here where, while there are some posts that, if I squint, could fit this, he took a lot of pressure *without* reacting like he did in that game. the only post that really fits with what he did in this game was 903, which by itself is completely fakeable.
In post 977, Boonskiies wrote:Yeah, mala and I have like dead similar reads. Scum is most definitely going at her wagon. Time to rethink it. Also, Sthar's read's are very similar, I believe.
In post 991, Boonskiies wrote:In post 958, DeltaWave wrote:In post 897, SleepyKrew wrote:Delta, can you link to a previous example of you refusing to lynch a D1 PR claim (or a discussion in which you state that you would refuse to lynch a D1 PR claim)?
Apparently the last game I played was Event Card Mafia in April 2014, but I got replaced out due to inactivity. Before that, my last game was Jason's British Royal Family Kingmaker in Feb of 2013. So, in the past two years I've played two games not counting my current games. I really don't remember if I have any examples of that.
Thor's lynch was ultimately good but I still stand by my principle that I won't lynch a D1 PR claim (unless it is directly counterclaimed.)
Overnight I read the thread and I get the strong impression that Jason is town. I also think I was too hard on STD. He has been downgraded from Scum to Null. SK seems increasingly town. I previously said Pie is scummy but after reviewing the thread he's probably more on the null side.
Boon is way too meta-aware for my liking. I still consider him a scumspect.
I'm going to get around to some VCA at some point.
This post is too wishy washy for me. Who exactly are you scum reading? He's setting himself up so he can vote in any direction without getting scrutinized for it. Congratulations, Egg, you are now only the 2nd scummiest person here.
VOTE: Delta
I still can't get over these 2 posts. I said this before, but the first post feels more like a cheap throwaway statement to misdirect off Mala than him actually believing this - for further proof, you'll notice his scum reads (Egg and DW) weren't even on the Mala wagon here.
the timing of the DW push, in particular, matches Mala's almost exactly. I don't know if this, by itself, means anything bc I think he was scum reading DW for a bit before this, but really, meh.
and the thing is, the assessment that he usually buses his partners as scum is correct. but I actually think he might have done this for the express purpose of playing to the exact *opposite* of his scum meta - rather than bussing his partners, he goes out of his way to defend them and/or vote along with them. this would explain why he suddenly shifted these 2 reads out of nowhere.
In post 1122, Boonskiies wrote:@Pie - Unless you can link more than one game where that proves to be true for ScumMala, then our read is perfectly justifiable and you are just bs and confbiasing. Don't care if it's activity reasons, that's how a lot of people town read me, based off of my activity.
I haven't got over this, either. he is literally saying here that I can't push Mala as scum unless I have a previous game where Mala did the same thing as scum, which makes no sense. it is another post that makes me think he was deliberately inventing reasons to defend Mala here. he had a lot of other posts where he pushed stuff similar to this; this is just one example
In post 2046, Boonskiies wrote:As scum, there would be no reason for me to not claim a PR in my position during the mass claim.
this post. I alluded to this when he made it, but this is another thing that makes me think he's deliberately playing to the exact opposite of his scum meta. for one reason:Boon has a habit of fake claiming PRs when he's scum.and the thing is, I wouldn't give a shit, but the way he's deliberately going out of his way to play up the idea that he fake claims PRs when he's scum is the kind of thing I would expect from scum playing this kind of strategy. he's bringing this up bc he deliberately played the exact opposite of the way he usually plays and wants people to town read him for it.
I'll take this opportunity to point out that all the self-meta from D2 I do think is actually null as opposed to scum motivated. his posts there struck me as posts that are within the realm of possibility for town-him to make - if you usually bus when scum, you would point this out even if you are town. this specific post, on the other hand, really just feels out of place and gives me the impression that he did it on purpose.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 694, Fenchurch wrote:My current reads list amounts to this:
pie - town
Dragons - prob town
Egg - maybe town
Jason - free pass for now
Trojan - mixed, not sure
Sleepy - no idea
Thor - no idea
Boon - no idea
Delta - null
sthar - null
Micc - null
.
.
.
I'd be pretty happy lynching Boon, who I don't have any town read on and think I may never get a reliable read on.
I was also wondering why Fen died on N1 bc I really do not know if Mala thought she could outargue her as opposed to someone like myself (this sounds egotistical as hell, but this is more a paranoid thought as opposed to an actual reason I have for Boon being scum). this would make it make more sense *if* Boon is scum here.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 2065, Boonskiies wrote:Granted, I was hard pushing for people not to lynch you because I thought you were obv town. A lot like how I was with Bins this game...interesting.
the other paranoid thought is that I think no-killing on purpose to line up a mislynch is exactly the kind of thing Boon would do as scum - and that if that is what he actually did here, it would make sense to WK it and then say something like this to call attention to it
he's demonstrated in several other games he has a tendency to no-kill on purpose as scum. I'm not sure if anyone else in this playerlist would have done this.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I'm trying to figure out why scum would leave STD alive if they had correctly figured out he was the RB on D2. given jason was a bogyguard and thus would (or rather, *should*) protect STD, I really do not think it would be worth it to no kill in that situation as opposed to shooting STD immediately - in other scenarios, it'd be worth it, but not when it'd get protected, I don't think. I'm not sure about this, though.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
o, mastin wanted me to inform everyone that if she was in this position, she'd be hipgunning for TH with no logical reason behind it. she also wanted to make it explicitly clear this was entirely gut and should probably be ignored
in case it's not obvious, I disagree with this-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
problem is, I don't remotely think it's a necessity that scum would push jason
if I was scum, I'd likely WK the shit out of it (admittedly in a similar way to what I did here) in no small part bc anyone who knows anything about setup spec would be able to confirm him as town anyway-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
honestly none of my attempts at rereading anything give me cause to question the current gamestate
I still think DW is town bc I really don't think Mala was thinking to distance from him in that situation
I still think sthar and TH are town - I still can't reconcile what the hell sthar was trying to do D2 if he was scum here. he would have had basically the entire day where he could have BS'ed a push on DW in order to save Mala, given he appeared to think DW was scum at the start of the day, but he chose not to for.... ??? plus Thor on D1
and Boon's recent play also supports it in that it looks like he's setting up to push TH tomorrow if Egg gets lynched today
it will fucking suck if I'm just missing something huge here and I've gone horribly wrong somewhere.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
actually you know what, I think Mala pushing DW is even more of a town tell for DW than it'd usually be otherwise because she knows there's a town roleblocker in the game. and by extension she'd know that having only 1 surviving scum is complete suicide
so the only way this is a lose is if I'm somehow horribly unbelievably wrong about sthar here-
-
pieguyn Survivor
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
In post 2115, Boonskiies wrote:Please, my team used tokens to get me a town slot; I'm far too easy of a potential random lynch to risk being scum here, especially with Pieguyn here who's seen my scum game for the umpteenth time recently.
you didn't think to mention this earlier? I would expect you should have mentioned something like this before.
you're actually a lot more subdued than I would expect from you as town in general, really
-
-