This.In post 2060, Killthestory wrote:dont try to comment on every page. just read and give your thoughts or youll never finish
There's less wrong with walls than there are a page of first three-four sentence posts.In post 2062, RachMarie wrote:@Kill doing short catchups as I go along so that its not one huge ass wall,
Bullshit. It took me six hours to get through everything, and that was when the page was on ~Page 54.In post 2063, RachMarie wrote:Ok caught up
I'll try to rephrase this to optimize clarity. If someone is doing something that is not helping town then they are not using their town slot as much as possible, which is akin to two wolves bringing sheep to their slaughter. It's a tug of war and town need to pull or they're being pulled. I don't accept the idea of neutral forces.In post 2067, Slandaar wrote:Assume there is a player X who is playing similar to Snarky and doing very little.
If this player X is town then they are helping scum I can accept this argument. They are helping scum because they are an easy target for a mislynch. The issue is that player X can be scum. When they are scum they are helping town making themselves a likely target for a lynch so their actions are pro-town. Taking all this into account we can say their actions are actually neutral unless you know their alignment. What they are actually doing is being anti-agenda, which is to say they are not playing to help their agenda whatever that is.
You imply Snarky posting more would have been a town action here.In post 1470, KuroiXHF wrote:Snarky is not helping the town. Snarky does not produce content. Snarky is coasting by, laying under the radar more than anyone (save one or two) andSnarky doesn't show that he's going to do anything differently.
?[/quote]
Abso-freaking-lutely. The EASIEST way for scum to sneak under the radar is to post enough to be seen as not being a lurker, but not enough to really be noticed. At the same time, it's one of the first things I look for. I look for people who post little or a lot, but with low content. I give them more less benefit of the doubt than I do someone who posts a lot, but is controversial with their opinions.