In post 116, TheDominator37 wrote:This is the first game ever that I have had no reads this far
In post 233, TheDominator37 wrote:In post 221, Alchemist21 wrote:@Dominator, care to explain your scumreads?
I may have been scumreading RC partly for playstyle. There are still parts of her early play that don't add up, and I still have a mild scumread on the slot, but I want to engage some other players for a while.
VOTE: Duppin
Where is this guy?
Here's why Dominator is scum.
At the time of 116, there were no wagons. Dominator says it has no reads.
At 146, there was a wagon on Cowbells. Dominator says its biggest scumread is Cowbells.
At 210, there were competing wagons on Nether and eventi. Dominator says it thinks Nether and eventi are scum together. Nether and eventi were attacking each other hard at this point. Of course two players fighting each other doesn't rule out the possibility of them being scum partners, but it's not a very intuitive assumption - it's unlikely that a townie will suspect two fighting players of being distancing scum without a compelling reason to suspect them both. Dominator's compelling reason is "bandwagon".
Finally, at 244, Dominator offers its own lynch today for Nether's lynch tomorrow. Townies who use this sort of rhetoric only do so when they're confident the player is scum, not when they're just bandwagoning. But what really makes me believe this isn't genuine is that Dominator only had two votes at this time, while Nether had three. If your town and your top suspect has more votes than you, you're not gonna tell people to lynch you instead, that'd be ridiculous. I think Dominator only said this to try to get town cred.