Secret Hitler (Voting)

[lilith2013]

I'm pretty sure when shos said "can we kill Aronis," he meant more along the lines of "can we make this a mafia game and lynch him because he is just being useless and anti-town" because that is what I have been thinking since page 3.

[shos]

@424:
1. no it's not. And please learn to write shorter sentences.

2. you don't have to vote ja for jelly you know, even if you vote nein here.
So far, it looks like you're pretty adamant about your views. So why then, do you vote a ja for a null PRESIDENT? you

know

that the president has much more weight than the chancellor. with a liberal president, you need only a single liberal card to get much goods, either locating a fascist in the price of a fascist rule (which allows the president to kill him immediately) or forcing a liberal rule.

explain that to me.

[shos]

I'm pretty sure when shos said "can we kill Aronis," he meant more along the lines of "can we make this a mafia game and lynch him because he is just being useless and anti-town" because that is what I have been thinking since page 3.

also this obviously lol, we are still at least 2 rules away from having an actual shot

[MrTrow]

@Lilith
like i said: that view i (would) understand.
That's not what he said, he meant though.

@424
2. you don't have to vote ja for jelly you know, even if you vote nein here.
So far, it looks like you're pretty adamant about your views. So why then, do you vote a ja for a null PRESIDENT? you

know

that the president has much more weight than the chancellor. with a liberal president, you need only a single liberal card to get much goods, either locating a fascist in the price of a fascist rule (which allows the president to kill him immediately) or forcing a liberal rule.

explain that to me.

Any preference to which explanation i should give?

My actual thoughts? (both then and now): '2 consecutive 'nein's, in this town, not gonna happen'

The logical follow-up if i had deemed, 'that solution' as remotely plausible. (which your assumption, there even is something to explain here, implies).
Do you recall my read on cephrir? Who would be candidate #3? EXACTLY
Do you recall what happens when we deny the presidential candidate 3 times in a row?
A situation we have discussed before. (Or more precisely, you decided to dodge (repeatedly?))

I had to choose between:
- null-Klick and Town-BB
- scum-Jelly and Unknown-chancellor
- scum-Cephrir and 'we have no say in the matter'-chancellor
- 'the public'
By choice of president ALONE: i stand by my vote.
(indeed less relevant) By choice of chancellor ALONE: i stand by my vote.
(next): By mechanics ALONE: i stand by my vote.

ALL of the above, has been explained before.
(and yes, if i had the choice to make BB president and Klick chancellor. I would have: that was not an option though)
What do you need me to explain?
Were these sentences short enough?

btw.

which allows the president to kill him immediately

- Not true
- Not confirmable, even if true
- actually believing this and the next post

we are still at least 2 rules away from having an actual shot

are mutually exclusive.

Care to explain, what you were thinking?

[Cephrir]

you just think i'm scum because i can't be bothered to do your stupid song and dance

[Cephrir]

please don't make a long post with a bunch of links in response to that, i won't read it

[MrTrow]

you just think i'm scum because i can't be bothered to do your stupid song and dance

You mean, scumhunting?
True, that might have something to do with it.

please don't make a long post with a bunch of links in response to that, i won't read it

I know

You won't give a town-motivation, for this call to apathy, either.

None of which, is remotely relevant to the post you're responding to, claim to not read, yet still respond to 1 detail, burried literally in the middle of the thing.

[Cephrir]

[shos]

Got it

[shos]

Ok so whats up with the legislativeeee

[shos]

Mass prodz be plez

[Klick]

(The mod hasn't been on to see my submission in almost three days.

I'll go back to not talking.)

[Blackberry]

(Twiddles thumbs)

[shos]

Well the good stuff in this game is that everything is traceable, so if the mod suddenly flakes we can find another.

[ChaosOmega]

Sorry about the delay. Axxle replaces Drench and the remaining policies have been passed to the Chancellor.

[shos]

Yaaaay

[Axxle]

@424:
1. no it's not. And please learn to write shorter sentences.

2. you don't have to vote ja for jelly you know, even if you vote nein here.
So far, it looks like you're pretty adamant about your views. So why then, do you vote a ja for a null PRESIDENT? you

know

that the president has much more weight than the chancellor. with a liberal president, you need only a single liberal card to get much goods, either locating a fascist in the price of a fascist rule (which allows the president to kill him immediately) or forcing a liberal rule.

explain that to me.

/ego

nothing to add right now

[Axxle]

Ignore that quote

[ChaosOmega]

The government has enacted a

Liberal Policy

.

Current Phase

:

Election, Chancellor Nomination

Deadline

: (expired on 2016-02-07 16:00:43)

Presidential Candidate

ForWhomTheJellyRolls

Cephrir

Aronis

Election Tracker

:

0

---Liberal Policy Track---
[O] [O] [ ] [ ] [ ]

---Fascist Policy Track---
[X] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Next Fascist Presidential Power: Investigate Loyalty

[Klick]

<3

I got two liberals and a fascist. I gave him one of each to test him.

[Aronis]

yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Unless Jelly comes up with the best reasoning ever or something like that. I'm voting nay to this govt.

[ForWhomTheJellyRolls]

Aronis, I gave up trying to reason with you a long time ago. There are a multitude of questions that you have straight up ignored. It trust you as much as you claim not to trust me. I believe you are playing a sort of "character" of someone who will simply refuse to reason with me. So I welcome your Nay vote because I expect nothing more or less from you.

Trow, what would you vote if I selected you chancellor?

[JDGA]

Hell yes

Worth noting that assuming no one's been lying, there's 2 liberal and 6 fascist left in the deck. Next policy has a mammoth 36% chance to be forced-fascist.

[shos]

hmm.

So two more liberal cards give us even more likelihood for Drench not lying. So far we have seen 4 liberal cards out of 9 used...we're likely to end up with a few fascists soon, I guess.

FWTJ, is a president I can support, yes. I think we should give Councellor to Lilith.

[ForWhomTheJellyRolls]

There are 6 Liberal cards in the deck, not 9.

Lilith is on my shortlist. There really are only a few people that I am even considering here.