In post 393, MrTrow wrote:
But to restate my jelly-case i had at the time of that first nomination:
- He was mudslinging. (accusations of mudslinging he could not back up (at least not without cutting conclusions off posts, to then claim the accusations to be empty. and even then barely))
- He implied knowing Drench's allignment (no need to reach across the aile)
- and (one you don't want to hear, sorry) Shos felt the need to advice him on something that would be a no-brainer if he was liberal.
This is your case against me? hmm. You have expressed the first point, and I understand your thinking there. I had a gut fascist read on you at the time and I couldn't pin it down exactly. As such I expressed myself poorly.
When did I imply that I knew Drench's alignment?
It's hard to argue with the third point because it's entirely dependent on the notion of shos and I both being fascists and how you interpret shos' actions. Although his "advice" seemed pretty obvious to me anyway and seemingly obvious to anyone who has some idea of the rules but I see your point. It looks like he's coaching. So the intention with that post is a bit murky but it still seems like a pretty obvious idea to me.
This vote is Ja for me. I don't have a reason to suspect either of these two of being fascist.