which is the first hint of concern about me that I can recall.In post 748, Bert wrote:no you are making me nervous with your not voting any of your scumreads
that's what makes me nervous.
which is the first hint of concern about me that I can recall.In post 748, Bert wrote:no you are making me nervous with your not voting any of your scumreads
I'm leaning toward not voting IA unless Cabd is still feeling pretty strongly about that read once he catches up. Which puts zzzx and possibly bulba in the frame.In post 749, Bert wrote:and you all but called bulba but leaned scum, didnt vote him
called IA your best option based on the read on sns's replaceout, still didnt vote them.
???
Do you have questions about my LS read?didnt discuss ETL and made comments about Beli whom I don't know, and then that was that.
do you feel like they are scum? yes or no or maybe?In post 755, morph the cat wrote:Do you have questions about my LS read?
You know where I stand if you're reading the thread today. It will be a consensus vote.In post 752, Bert wrote:like, being concerned about you and waiting for you to actually place a vote or commit somewhere is about as exciting as watching paint dry
so, i have sat on my hands until 20 hours remaining
u deadIn post 758, Guyett wrote:Hoe nany voyrs fo we havre?
Do you not trust my ability to read Guyett, with whom I've played a good number of games with, as well as hydra'd a good number of games with? He's like my best friend on this site...In post 754, Bert wrote:i just want to get a flip and move on at this point, we've had extensions and all kinds of stuff already.
such a drag.......
No.In post 757, Bert wrote:do you feel like they are scum? yes or no or maybe?In post 755, morph the cat wrote:Do you have questions about my LS read?
A good point.i also dont want to end the day at deadline, i want time for someone to be "dead" before then before the thread locks, so i can see if i can submit "during the day" and talk to that dead person at night if he/she flips town. its worth a shot
I cakl billsjit
I actually thought that argument lasted longer than it did and was surprised that you never answered the second post (Why didn't you?). But you've still tunneled me on the Mirhawk argument, as you continue to cling to it as a reason and have never addressed what I've said and have now said I was dodging you, when I have not.In post 753, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:1) Where is the tunneling and shouting in the first quote? I wanted you to answer the question, and you still didn't answer it, so I asked you again and tried to make it clearer. So, where is the "tunneling and shouting"?
But that's not what you said. You said that I neglected to answer, or ignored, several of your questions, which was false. I then went out of my way to answer them again, and you ignored my response and have still shown no indication that you acknowledge that I addressed all your questions in the first place.In post 753, EspeciallyTheLies wrote: 2) I did not feel you answered them to my satisfaction, so I pointed them out for you specifically to answer.
No, that's not what I said:In post 753, EspeciallyTheLies wrote: 3) No. You said that the argument was invalid because town make up the majority. If there were various other reasons, why did you pick that one and not mention anything else that would prove your point? Because "town is the majority" is pretty lame, especially if there are "a variety of reasons", none of which you expanded upon.
And then you call it strawmanning when I am referring to things you yourself said and asking you about them.
I mentioned the majority part in passing. My main argument was that the theory is very shaky, and that VCs can never give you a proper idea of what the buildup and momentum of a wagon actually looks like. This is something that I've argued in multiple games. As a secondary piece of information, this theory is okay. As a primary piece of evidence used to break up a wagon, it is absolutely horrible, especially when you use it to break up the wagon on someone you had been scumreading. You essentially used that theory to break up the wagon after accusing everyone on the wagon for having no reason to vote IA, which was false.In post 550, Bulbazak wrote: Furthermore, the counterwagon theory that you are trying to present is very shaky to start with. It's based on the concept of scum wagons having resistance to them, even though town make up a majority of the players. As such, VCs can not always give you the best picture of what's going on. The IA wagon, for example, was very difficult to get started. It actually stalled a couple of times before it took off. And it took its time in building. It should say something that the last 3 votes or so joined the wagon relatively quickly. And let's not even talk about all those times that wagons on scum build without a counterwagon due to that person either being very scummy and/or town being very in sync. Given the evidence in thread, I believe that the IA wagon has the best chance of flipping scum.
You presented my argument in the most insulting and degrading means possible. Not only that, but you took part of one line out of my argument and used it to discredit the entire thing. And then you said I was lying, which I was not, which was essentially you furthering coloring my arguments in a negative light, instead of straight up dealing with them. If you don't think that's insulting, then that just proves that you are too far gone.In post 753, EspeciallyTheLies wrote: Nowhere in 551 did I insult you. Not once. I didn't call you names. I didn't insult your intelligence. I didn't verbally abuse you. Just because I used the words "bullshit" and "fucking" to color my narrative doesn't make it insulting.
When you have your head stuck in the sand and are refusing to listen to anything I have to say, heck yeah I'm going to call you out on you having conf. bias regarding my alignment!In post 753, EspeciallyTheLies wrote: I was pretty clear on why you were wrong. And again you are trying to discredit my read on you by calling it confbias, and besides being one of my biggest pet peeves on this site, it's most often done to me by scum.
Oh hey I have mo idea who the fuvk any onecus ib yhis gane.... how hadx asking for fkavut = rolefish?In post 772, Bulbazak wrote:ETL, I want you to spell out why IA is town, because the only thing they've done all game is rolefish, and there has been zero scumhunting coming from that slot.