Mini 932: Let's all be friends (Over)

SpyreX · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:57 am

Budja wrote:I am experiencing mafia withdrawal

What he was thinking wrote:I am excited to be mafia and kill all of you and my impatience grows strong at the fact you're not allowing this to happen.

What this means wrote:I'm scum!

Case solved. Time to lynch budja!

CHOO CHOO

Vote: Budja

cruelty · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:32 pm

vote: cathart

omgus

Fongoid · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:33 pm

Lol SpyreX

Vote: DisgruntledSean

I prefer my friends to be happy!

WingsOWisdom · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:19 pm

Vote: IcemanE

I'm sick of winter.

SpyreX · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:28 pm

I see three non-budja votes.

I am not amused.

Budja · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:13 pm

I am not amused either

.

vote: SpyreX

SpyreX · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:23 pm

Ohh budja, budja, budja

Is that FEAR I taste under the weight of IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE?

I mean, I've never been a part of getting you killed before so that HAS to be what it is.

Budja · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:26 pm

I came into this game planning on RVSing you and you beat me to it. Shame on you.
This is obv. vendetta.

SpyreX · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:34 pm

So you're admitting to your OMGUS based on fear of my LYNCHING PROWESS.

We're getting somehwere.

Somewhere that has you in a rope, mr.

Hoopla · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:21 pm

Sotty, that was so predictable. I'm a little disappointed.

Vote: Budja

SpyreX · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:22 pm

See HOOPLA gets it.

Riddick · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:21 am

vote budja

let's try and lynch him before he can post again. it'd be rather funny. (+ he's scum)

Sidekick · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:01 am

Vote Hoopla

On the basis that you can not possibly have a birthday everyday!

Sidekick · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:01 am

Riddick wrote:
vote budja

let's try and lynch him before he can post again. it'd be rather funny. (+ he's scum)

Is dat sum bandwagoning I smell?

Hoopla · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:09 am

Sidekick wrote:
Riddick wrote:
vote budja

let's try and lynch him before he can post again. it'd be rather funny. (+ he's scum)
Is dat sum bandwagoning I smell?

Why do three votes make a bandwagon, and not two? From the tone of your post, it seems you have an anti-bandwagoning stance - can you clarify your position for me?

Riddick · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:23 am

Sidekick wrote:
Riddick wrote:
vote budja

let's try and lynch him before he can post again. it'd be rather funny. (+ he's scum)
Is dat sum bandwagoning I smell?

can u smell what the rock is cooking?

on a more serious note, why did you ask that question? do you think i'm bandwagoning, and if i am what does it mean? more likely to be town or scum or is it null?

DisgruntledSean · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 7:31 am

Vote: Riddick

i don't know if you're bandwagoning exactly,
but a bit eager to lynch

Riddick · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:50 am

DisgruntledSean wrote:
Vote: Riddick

i don't know if you're bandwagoning exactly,
but a bit eager to lynch

How does me placing a 3rd vote on a player make me 'eager to lynch'? I'm not even sure what you mean by eager to lynch, but I'd like you to tell me why it's scummy, please.

SpyreX · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:24 am

A better question is:

If you found something you thought was actually WORTH noting as a scum manuever, why would you leave your vote on a random?

Unvote, Vote: Sidekick

Col.Cathart · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:38 am

DisgruntledSean wrote:
Vote: Riddick

i don't know if you're bandwagoning exactly,
but a bit eager to lynch

What's wrong with early wagoning? It's a typical practice in these games...

Riddick · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:53 am

SpyreX wrote:A better question is:

If you found something you thought was actually WORTH noting as a scum manuever, why would you leave your vote on a random?

Unvote, Vote: Sidekick

you're right that IS a good question.

unvote vote sidekick

Sotty7 · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:07 am

Eh I don't like Riddick echoing hoopla and following Spy. Sure it's only page two but a little original thought would be nice.

Unvote, Vote: Riddick

DisgruntledSean · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:10 am

riddick wrote: let's try and lynch him before he can post again. it'd be rather funny. (+ he's scum)

this reads to me like eagerness to kill someone not yet suspicious
whether it's early bandwagoning or not is besides the point i was trying to make

Sotty7 · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:12 am

How serious do you think he was with that post?

Riddick · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:12 am

Sotty7 wrote:Eh I don't like Riddick echoing hoopla and following Spy. Sure it's only page two but a little original thought would be nice.

Unvote, Vote: Riddick

Would you say I've given less or more original thought than Col. Cathart?
Also wouldn't you say his question pretty much echoes mine to DS's? If so is there any reason you 1) chose not to comment on it and 2) Felt mine was more scummy.

What's wrong with following someone if they make a good point? I don't know why that would be scummy, I hadn't noticed what Spy had but when he pointed it out I agreed and felt it was at least voteworthy.