NY139: Underground Mafia (Game over!)

[Pine]

@pine, trekker might have scumslipped here and confirms that he was saying there were three scum here.

i don't think both trekker and battousai can be scum.

No more votes.

I want eep to explain this post and his vote on trekker. They are significantly at odds.

[Pine]

In fact, sorgster please unvote as fast as you can, trekker is in quickhammering range right now.

[Pine]

My RC said that Battousai was Hider, instead of getting a result on Uprising. What's going on, and why are we lynching him??

VOTE: eep

A slight never mind. This post condemns trekker. There is no ability within Normal ruleset that will confuse a rolecop in this manner. Framer can give a cop a false guilty, Godfather a false innocent, or roleblock can stop it completely. But nothing can confuse it like this.

Disregard the call for unvotes, but not the request for no more votes. I'll be hammering when I'm satisfied with eep's answer, as I now suspect him of bussing rather than trying to mislynch.

[eep]

uhh, i think sorgster's vote was the hammer.

also, I'm not quite sure what you're saying, pine? trekker said he was looking for 3 scum d3, battousai insisted there were 4. It was inconsistent, but that's not really an issue after battousai and uprising flipped.

[eep]

in fact you quoted trekker's lie. Why is it problematic that I'm voting for him when you agree he has to be scum?

[eep]

never mind, you seem to think I'm scum independent of that. Care to make a case?

[Pine]

Six alive, four votes needed for hammer. With three votes, he's at L-1.

I was asking you to justify your reversal on trekker, but it had not occurred to me in my haste that you're right, being caught in a lie does justify it completely.

I don't have a case, as I've been unable to do the promised full workups on the remaining possible scum, just the one point that jumped out at me. I'll deal with it over the night.

Vote: trekker

[implosion]

Vote Count 7.1 (final)

AntB
sorgster
StevieT92
Pine
eep

trekker - 4 (eep, trekker, StevieT92, sorgster) (lynch)

Not voting - 2 (AntB, Pine)

With 8 alive, 5 votes are required to lynch.

Deadline is in i-don't-feel-like-doing-the-countdown-tags-since-i-don't-need-to.

If you

ever

notice a mistake that I've made with the votecount (or elsewhere) don't hesitate to tell me.

[implosion]

Flavor goes here. Delicious, delicious flavor.

trekker, Mafia rolecop, lynched day seven.

It is now Night Seven. Deadline is in (expired on 2011-10-31 18:17:25).

[implosion]

There are leaders, and there are followers. There are those who actively seek their allies, and those who are passively found.

One of the former is dead. He had managed to remain out of sight for an entire week. But now, he had been disposed of.

...

...

sorgster, Town 1-shot Recruiting Mason, Killed Night 7.

It is now

week 2, day 1

day 8. Deadline will be 3 weeks from this post at 9:00 PM EST.

[Pine]

Vote: No Lynch

3:1, classic MyLo.

[StevieT92]

vote:eep

I don't see the reason to No lynch. Besides the fact that I know who the scum is (its eep)..you're probably going to be killed tonight, as you look the most townie out of anyone left. Then it's down to me, AntB, and eep. So the entire town is resting on AntB's shoulders to decide who is town and who is scum. That's not exactly a situation I am confident in to win.

Who do you think is scum? And if you don't buy my case look at Strginer Bell and trekker's interactions with scum. Also trekker's tunneling on AntB makes me think antb is more likely to be town.

[StevieT92]

ebwop: stringer bell and trekker's interactions with eep.

also if you can't tell pine the previous post is addressed to you.

[Pine]

I understood. I'm considering it.

[AntB]

No lynch seems to be the better option here.
Waiting for eep before I vote.

[AntB]

although thinking about it, if I end up in the 3-way... I'm probably going to be boned.

[eep]

when did trekker tunnel against antb?

I think Stevie is scum and I can pull a case together when I am not on my phone, but I will hold off voting for now.

[StevieT92]

although thinking about it, if I end up in the 3-way... I'm probably going to be boned.

exactly, why don't we just lynch eep and have an early victory parade. what do we gain by no lynching? nothing at all, we're not gonna get any more info since we already mass claimed.

[StevieT92]

@eep I do not need to defend myself. If pine and AntB are confused as to my town credibility, they can look at Day 5. That simply is not a scum play.

[Pine]

Hrm...but that is ^

[StevieT92]

don't care ... because i know from 70 pages eep will be able to cherry pick quotes to make me look scummy

[eep]

actually, a lot of your day 5 play was VERY scummy. trying to persuade people with "what scum would do" tells me you're doing your best to APPEAR town, not that you ARE town.

[eep]

also, enough question dodging: WHEN DID TREKKER TUNNEL ON ANTB?

[StevieT92]

Re-read, and trekker was tunneling on Stringer Bell, not AntB. That is my mistake. AntB was tunneled on a lot in this game but it was not by Trekker and he could be the last scum instead of eep. Eep what do you think about antb?

In my re-read I also found this little gem for you guys:

eep and Stringer Bell are partners.

Trekker is a known busser on Stringer Bell, and his other main scum suspect was eep. This isn't a lock but it certainly is something to think about.

[Pine]

1148 is enough to make me do this:

Unvote
Vote: Stevie

I find it hard to believe he was bussing both of his partners. Typically, you bus one to establish credibility and ride that to several mislynches.