In post 55, BirdAndBeast wrote:ArcAngel, care to join us?
I am here!!!
In post 56, BirdAndBeast wrote:Also, this is a seriously newb/alt-dominated game. We have at minimum nine players who are not very experienced. The total number of players who I have no familiarity with is 14.
So, could everyone give me an idea of how much experience you have with the game, and where? (Especially on-site. On-site games are good.) And about how often you play and how recently you last played?
In post 66, njoseph wrote:13 to lynch, oh, BOY ...
In post 77, The Mini-Librarian wrote:Why thezmon is scum
59: Ignores essentially the entire thread to post a rv. Shows that he is actually reading the thread (responds to bird and beast's question about experience) but doesn't do anything productive at all with the gamestate.
67: suggests that it's good play to vote for who you think is scummiest at this stage of the game, still has a vote on someone who hasn't posted.
In post 92, ArcAngel9 wrote:Vote: BirdAndBeast
In post 96, BirdAndBeast wrote:Hi Arcangel. I heard my name.
Mastin and I are so obvtown. You look town, Why you vote us?
~Bird
In post 126, njoseph wrote:We have 25 people to this game. Do we care who's neglibibly better "might as well" lynch than the other?
In post 128, HeatherA wrote:@PM - that's an odd first post. It's almost like you're asking to be PL'd.
Personally I'm not a big fan of PL's. I'd much rather lynch scum than some poor newbie who's made a couple of mistakes.
In post 160, BirdAndBeast wrote:In post 158, Sixx wrote:I don't see a reason to D1 lynch him.
In post 39, Sixx wrote:
Only reason that I'm not going to vote Rogeris simply because this is his first game and I'm going to hope he learns something from it.
But you apparently DID see a reason to lynch him in post 39. What reason was that?
@Parama: Wahh wahh. Mastin's around. We'll come up with a sexy battle plan shortly.
In post 166, BirdAndBeast wrote:OKAY, LET'S DO THIS SHIT.
Heather's scum. Sixx is scum. Thezmon is scum. Roger is possible scum. We're lynching one of them.
In post 187, StrangerCoug wrote:The first A in ArcAngel9's username has been added back to the vote count.
In post 178, BirdAndBeast wrote:Then join us on thezmon. If there were to be a dayvig, they'd take out Sixx. But since dayvigs aren't a common role, we can't rely on 'em. Thezmon today, Sixx tomorrow (or also today if there's a dayvig).In post 177, ArcAngel9 wrote:I am comfortable any of them.
In post 191, Bumi wrote:In post 177, ArcAngel9 wrote:In post 166, BirdAndBeast wrote:OKAY, LET'S DO THIS SHIT.
Heather's scum. Sixx is scum. Thezmon is scum. Roger is possible scum. We're lynching one of them.
Roger is a new player and new players usually be townie's.
I am comfortable any of them. do we have day Vig kill?
How does any of this make sense?
In post 193, Aj The Epic wrote:Parma and B&B have an argument that could justify their own votes, but I see three sheep and it isn't even time for me to go to bed yet. I'd like for Njoseph, Arc and Liberian to post any tells, just minor leanings and the sort, of those who have posted please. You are sheep, and must at least give something to contribute. Start there.
In post 197, Bumi wrote:In post 194, ArcAngel9 wrote:What is that doesn't make sense to you, more details pls.
Why are newbies usually townie?
Why do you ask about a day vig kill?
In post 205, The Mini-Librarian wrote:In post 193, Aj The Epic wrote:Parma and B&B have an argument that could justify their own votes, but I see three sheep and it isn't even time for me to go to bed yet. I'd like for Njoseph, Arc and Liberian to post any tells, just minor leanings and the sort, of those who have posted please. You are sheep, and must at least give something to contribute. Start there.
What the fuck are you talking about? Read my iso.
In post 230, nhammen wrote:I don't see it. Arc is null for me. Maybe a hair South of null for #94, but it's not much. She could be removed from the game, and I would see no difference.BirdAndBeast wrote:No joke: it'd be easier to quote the parts of ArcAngel's posts which DON'T make me think town.
In post 232, BirdAndBeast wrote:
I think this is yours.
What is wrong with a day vig day killing exactly? Sheeping is not scummy, its just sheeping. And ArcAngel clearly had original thoughts of her own if you ISO her.
In post 235, Aj The Epic wrote:To post 233
I disagree fully on part 2. Asking to day vig a player this early when not everyone has even checked in is really bad in my mind. To me, the vig needs to operate on their own reads until they have a confirmed townie to reason with.
In post 237, Baby Spice wrote:I wonder if the Angel read too much into Parama's first post.
In post 243, nhammen wrote:New players are just as likely to be scum as experienced players. Roles are assigned randomly. But I get what you are saying: newb townies get placed under suspicion more often than experienced townies, so given that a player has come under suspicion, if that player is new, they are more likely to be town than if they are experienced. I think that's what you were trying to say?In post 177, ArcAngel9 wrote:Roger is a new player and new players usually be townie's.
In post 263, thezmon221 wrote:
Who I think is scummy on the wagon (in order of scummiest-nullest):
B&B, njoseph, SoraAdvent, ArcAngel, Parama
.
In post 302, Aj The Epic wrote:Arc, He stated "Who I think is scummy on the wagon" Skim much?
Also, funny:
Arc wrote:How does the day vig is any different to night vig? they both do the same..Kill. Day Vig is good for town if the right choice has been made. This concern of yours wonders me if you're afraid of being killed or lynched in the day phase? so are you the scum?
That's not even part of the discussion. Trying to draw off?
arc wrote:I am comfortable any of them. do we have day Vig kill?Here's your post about vigs. Tell me this isn't fishing, to me face and honestly. Do we have any day vigs? Hello! That's fishing basics 101: Cast a line and wait for response.
And when Bumi questioned you, in which I guess he has the same concerns, your answer was:
and, I just wanted to know if there is any Day Vig kill. This is a big game. They come under good use if we have two major suspects in a day phase. Isn't a good thing to have ability to hit Mafia twice?
Yes, you just wanted to know. Exactly, so stop being dishonest later. This is a role fish, you are a role fisher. Mafia Jesus came to you and said, "“Follow me, and I will make you fishers of roles.” Sure, it's nice to have a day vig, but you don't need to out him day 1. The only way to for us to learn this is for him to kill someone or him to say it. And a kill this early will most likely be mislead. So he'd probably have to say it.
VOTE: ArcAngel
Denial of fishing, fishing, and sheeping. And, until the advent of a reason for your vote on Thezmon, you are sheeping in my mind.
In post 319, KillerApple wrote:In post 317, HeatherA wrote:
And so far what you've done is derail me from any proper scumhunting, which I find equally as frustrating as your poor attitude.
Also, ArcAngel you clearly misinterpreted that last quote of yours. Thezmon put together a list of scummy people that were voting for him. He didn't say that everyone who votes for him is scum. This looks like an obvious attempt to twist his words, which is very scummy to me.
VOTE: ArcAngel
In post 349, thezmon221 wrote:Getting a bit defensive, are we? However, I agree that your posts are not nearly as bad as some other players. Though, I've decided to change my vote due to:In post 346, Parama wrote:mastin2 I don't really care what you think of me
It should be noted that I am the reason the goddamn wagon exists in the first place
Soooo if you think I'm the worst vote then you shouldn't be approving of the wagon
1. It's not going to do me any good.
2. It's better placed in another area.
3. I've read the posts more and when I initially made the vote, it was more out of spite, though I do believe I still have some merit to my words, he's not as scummy as I first perceived.
VOTE: ArcAngel
Albus Dumbledore wrote:Sixx, you want me to elaborate beyond the incredibly obvious scumminess, you mean?Like how he clearly didn't read the thread and simply stuck his vote on the only wagon with no justification(bonus points if you noticed he made up a super bullshit reason afterwards)andthen got scared when called out on it, revealing his scum mindset for all to see?And that terrible vote on Roger just to top it off? You're right, I've got nothing.So skimming over RVS and voting on someone I first thought had joined the game and wanted to get a read on is scummy?
I'd hardly call myself scared. You can ask anyone of the four who had played with me on our other site; I play scum really well. My town play is far worse than my scum play.
I'll give you the vote on Robert, though.
In post 354, thezmon221 wrote:You reacted pretty harshly to the wagon reads post, which vaulted you up my list.In post 316, thezmon221 wrote:So obviously you didn't read it in context. B&B asked me who on my WAGON is scummy. And besides, I've already said a couple of those reads are null anyway, but null leaning scum which is why I mentioned them. You happen to be one of those null-scum reads. But if you want a list of reasons, here's those reasons.In post 301, ArcAngel9 wrote:Great, this list is just great. so whoever votes you next will come under your scum list?
Hello, that's not how mafia works. everyone who votes you doesn't mean they're scum.
so why do you think i am in your scum list. Care to explain?
-Newfound skimming (which I know isn't really a scum tell, but I've found scum are the more often skimmers.)
-I noticed that you have scumhunted, so that would be town points for you
-You drawing out the Day Vig conversation into what appears to me as a fish more than anything, or even pressuring the DV to kill someone D1. Sure, it's not aterrible(not terrible scummy, but terrible bad) option, but it would be far better to wait IME for D2.
Realistically, if you look at my top reads, you're the only I have a chance at lynching currently, so consider this an attempt at a counter wagon.StrangerCoug wrote:VOTE COUNT
ArcAngel9 (2): Aj The Epic, KillerApple
Baby Spice (1): theomoaner
BirdAndBeast (1): thezmon221
KillerApple (1): nhammen
Roger Thornhill (1): Archetype
SoraAdvent (1): Bumi
The Mini-Librarian (1): Robert2424
thezmon221 (9): The Mini-Librarian, BirdAndBeast, njoseph, Parama, ArcAngel9, SoraAdvent, Baby Spice, unseencamo, JohnnyFarrar
unseencamo (1): HeatherA
No Lynch (1): Roger Thornhill
Not voting (6): Albus Dumbledore, DayVigilante, ewo2, PMysterious, Sixx, JacobSavage
With25alive, it takes13players to lynch.
theomoaner is prodded.
In post 363, JacobSavage wrote:@Thez told you it was very weak. This is also an example why quiclynching is a bad move. Thez is becoming more and more town like.
His reaction under pressure to me stinks of being town orientated.
In other news ArcAngles last post is terrible. I know of no role that upon the flip of one player it causes another player to be confirmed innocent. To be it seams far too much like Scum trying to distance their buddy through the medium of WIFOM.
Thus;
VOTE: ArcAngel9
P.s. Merry Christmas to you all
In post 398, thezmon221 wrote:
I feel I've said this before, but that is because I already have and you apparently haven't read it yet, or skimmed it, or something else, but IArcAngel9 wrote:I want to see you as townie but you irrational way of calling me scum doesn't make you townie. you need to understand that. do you have any other actual reasons for your vote other than as counter vote to mine?havegiven my reasons before. Here are three points which basically summarize my reasoning. The counterwagon was just a slightly easier way for me to transition votes and isn't really a point in my voting of you.
1. The Day Vig draw-out earlier in the day. I believe it was... Aj? or B&B? can't quite recall who, but they made a comment on Day Vig and you drew it out and made a big deal about it.
2. Reaction to my scumwagon list.
3. Most recent reactions to my posts and three votes on you.
In post 408, thezmon221 wrote:First I will say that I have nothing to hide. However, are you trying to sway me to an opinion in the form of resolution and semi-control of your vote?In post 405, njoseph wrote:How about this paradigm? Unvoting from you coupled with the assumption that you get investigated by a presumably existing investigative role?
You definitely appeared to be rolefishing to me.ArcAngel9 wrote:Your Reason 1, It was me who is asking for if we have Day vig available in the game, i certainly didn't ask anyone to kill anyone and you can't quite recall it why mentioning it?
IME, you started to get defensive in this post, Post 301, and it started to lead to Reason 3, which is the bigger reason.Your Reason 2, Your scum list is equals to the players who voted you, i was only telling that everybody who voted you are not scummy. you need to see that positively if you're a townie.
So you’re telling me that reactions can’t be part of a reason? Because that is what the first sentence is asking. And for the second sentence, that is NOT what I said, go back and reread it. However, it should be noted, as it is in the spoiler, that I HAVE explained myself several times and you seem to just ignore it.Your Reason 3, TBH, Is this even a reason? Your last reason is that I was complaining that you failed to provide reasons for your vote? Can be any funnier than this? Huh!!!
Here’s what I’m seeing:
Spoiler:
You can add AtE as a minor reason at this point. This is not the first time you’ve said something like this. I don’t care what you think of me, so stop trying to make me care.i offered you twice that i was willing to consider you as townie but you repeatedly failed your self that may be
Thank you StrangerCoug.
In post 416, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 414, njoseph wrote:I am not moved by so-far-stuff to unvote thez. Let's get to deadline. If thez still has the most votes, see people jump on him.
So you plan on being unproductive for the rest of the day, and hoping to skim through without contributing?
More votes on Njoseph, please. Scum found. He obviously doesn't want to contribute, and his posts basically say that. Let's get to the deadline? Vote off thez, jump on his wagon? Even as others are reconsidering. Please, let's lynch this one.
In post 420, thezmon221 wrote:Let me get this straight. You voted me when you didn't think I was scum before? Nice. You didn't like your vote on me before, but voted for me anyway? Nice. Don't say I put words in your mouth, because you said it all in that last sentence (which I bolded just so you would make sure not to miss it). More support for my vote on you. I almost voted for nj too for his lack of contribution, but I'm not so sure anymore... Definitely would put my vote on either. The two of you are frontrunners for my scumread, just so everyone knows where I stand in the form of such.ArcAngel9 wrote:you know what i give up now.
I really hope others would see this behaviour of yours.Its hopeless to argue with you.
I officially call you SCUM now and support my vote on you.
By the way, that second line, which I underlined, is a classic scum move when presented an argument like mine. Iyou your quotes and an argument I feel was rather sound, especially the AtE and the claiming I never gave you reasons, and then you decide not to argue with me? Backed into a corner is more like it.showed
He's not. He's trying to get his own lynch going.ArcAngel9 wrote:and why exactly you're working through Thez defense? thez seems to be pretty good to handling himself on his own way...
In post 430, Jal wrote:
In post 421, ArcAngel9 wrote:My Initial vote on you just an RVS, I was open to change my vote if there were any good reasons instead your behaviour gotten worse and now you're acting beyond worse.
A vote for Thez (or anyone) on page 8 isnotRVS in any shape or form.
In post 431, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 419, ArcAngel9 wrote:In post 416, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 414, njoseph wrote:I am not moved by so-far-stuff to unvote thez. Let's get to deadline. If thez still has the most votes, see people jump on him.
So you plan on being unproductive for the rest of the day, and hoping to skim through without contributing?
More votes on Njoseph, please. Scum found. He obviously doesn't want to contribute, and his posts basically say that. Let's get to the deadline? Vote off thez, jump on his wagon? Even as others are reconsidering. Please, let's lynch this one.
If you think he is Scum, why did't change your VOTE yet?
and why exactly you're working through Thez defense? thez seems to be pretty good to handling himself on his own way...
Skimming a bit, I see. I voted for Njoseph a while ago. As for defending Thez, no, syrup to flies is the same as Thez's wagon is for scum. And Njospeh is one of the scum, he's not playing his town meta at all. And he is really giving bad answers to one vote. I told you he cracked under pressure, but he's not able to say much positive after any attention has been put on him at all.
In post 435, StrangerCoug wrote:jeck replaces theomoaner.
In post 428, Sixx wrote:Happy birthday StrangerCoug
Thank you!
Edit:Forgot to mention that KillerApple has asked for replacement, too. I know, things happen.
In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4576376#p4576376]post 472[/url], KillerApple wrote:Busy with the holidays, so before I get replaced.. UNVOTE: ArcAngel
Getting more of a town read recently so just thought I'd make this one last post.
In post 475, nhammen wrote:Yeah, that was a townie move from KillerApple (unless this is some sort of elaborate trick).
UNVOTE: KillerApple
VOTE: njoseph
In post 484, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 466, ArcAngel9 wrote:so your point about njospeh vote is that you know his play style as townie and he is now acting strange which makes him scum, correct?
Yes, I played against him as scum recently. For day 1, he posted well and was seemingly null enough, but day 2, after a bit of pressure, he cracked at l-2, self voted and put himself at l-1 as a townie to try to draw votes away. He muddled the town really badly until Nachomomma8 replaced him.
He cracks REALLY easily, to be honest, but noticeably different was the fact that on day 1, he was actively involved in trying to attack/lynch others. I honestly think his 'come at me' attitude is scum enough. He's challenging me and I know how this should end.
In post 565, SlySly wrote:Scum team A:
ArcAngel
Bumi
B&B
Scum not on team A:
NJ
-----------
UNVOTE: whoever KillerApple was voting for
VOTE: NJ
I'd much rather lynch AA, though.
-----------
I'll dig through tomorrow and illustrate why AA is scum. My vote will more than likely change at that point.
In post 584, SlySly wrote:
Instabus.
---
Make point to build credibility for scum buddy.
---
This is absolute crap. They only reason all players are more likely to be town than scum is because there are more town in games than scum. Being new has nothing to do with alignment. Is Roger on your team too?
---
Had you offered a target for the vig, this wouldn't be such a blatant role fish, but you didn't, so it is.
---
In post 192, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 178, BirdAndBeast wrote:Then join us on thezmon. If there were to be a dayvig, they'd take out Sixx. But since dayvigs aren't a common role, we can't rely on 'em. Thezmon today, Sixx tomorrow (or also today if there's a dayvig).In post 177, ArcAngel9 wrote:I am comfortable any of them.
Can't agree more.. Here you go..
Vote: thezmon
Sheeping of B&B. Aren't you a big fan of giving reasoning AA? Well you provided none here.
---
In post 199, ArcAngel9 wrote:
and, I just wanted to know if there is any Day Vig kill. This is a big game. They come under good use if we have two major suspects in a day phase. Isn't a good thing to have ability to hit Mafia twice?
Second mention, still no suggested target.
---
Bumi begins his AA love.
---
In post 301, ArcAngel9 wrote:
In post 232, BirdAndBeast wrote:
I think this is yours.
What is wrong with a day vig day killing exactly? Sheeping is not scummy, its just sheeping. And ArcAngel clearly had original thoughts of her own if you ISO her.
Exactly, I was only inquiring about if the game has day Vig kill. Its not a bad option. It helps town to make two kills before the day ends.
In post 235, Aj The Epic wrote:To post 233
I disagree fully on part 2. Asking to day vig a player this early when not everyone has even checked in is really bad in my mind. To me, the vig needs to operate on their own reads until they have a confirmed townie to reason with.
How does the day vig is any different to night vig? they both do the same..Kill. Day Vig is good for town if the right choice has been made. This concern of yours wonders me if you're afraid of being killed or lynched in the day phase? so are you the scum?
3rd and 4th mention, still no suggested target. AA, just admit it, you were role fishing.
---
Ad hom.
In post 342, ArcAngel9 wrote:
There is no proof to your theory, you're just making up a story to vote me.
i strongly hope the town see this behaviour you.
Refer to the above and below. I'm seeing plenty of reason to vote your scummy ass.
---
You've just described Bumi's play in regards to you!
In post 201, Bumi wrote:ArcAngel is town.
In post 300, Bumi wrote:
I really hate the mentality of this post to and the specific null leaning on Arc.
--
In post 302, Aj The Epic wrote:
VOTE: ArcAngel
Denial of fishing, fishing, and sheeping. And, until the advent of a reason for your vote on Thezmon, you are sheeping in my mind.
In post 303, Bumi wrote:I think you are splitting hairs, Aj.
--
In post 320, Bumi wrote:That is a very bad vote Killer and you are very scummy for making it.
In post 321, Aj The Epic wrote:Explain.
In post 322, Bumi wrote:I will. At a later point in time.
Mainly due to the fact that Arc is from India and things can get lost in translation. You can see some fumblings in her earlier posts. It looks like Killer is going after something easy to have his vote down.
--
Even B&B gets into the AA love. Notice he says everyone is townish, but AA is "def-town"
In post 169, BirdAndBeast wrote:
AJ is townish. Dumbledore looks townish. nhammen is townish as well. ArcAngel is def-town, as is njoseph and TML. Baby Spice is town. Jacob is town. Johnny looks town. Killer Apple is town. Theomoaner's townish, as is unseencamo.
In post 216, BirdAndBeast wrote:Multiple times I was ready to comment on something, only to see that Arc had already beaten me to the punch. No way she's scum.
In post 220, BirdAndBeast wrote:No joke: it'd be easier to quote the parts of ArcAngel's posts which DON'T make me think town.
In post 228, BirdAndBeast wrote:Both of these are bullshit. She's clearly not sheeping, and she was clearly not rolefishing for a dayvig.In post 227, Aj The Epic wrote:I present two charges to her: Sheeping and Role fishing day vig.
She was clearly sheeping and rolefishing. Nice try though.
In post 232, BirdAndBeast wrote:
What is wrong with a day vig day killing exactly? Sheeping is not scummy, its just sheeping. And ArcAngel clearly had original thoughts of her own if you ISO her.
There is nothing wrong with a day vig killing. The fact you are missing is AA, in her first 4 mentions of dayvig, never suggested a target, she just fished. Sheeping is the perfect/easiest way for scum to hop on a wagon.
In post 233, BirdAndBeast wrote:
If you think ArcAngel was sheeping, you need to get better at reading sub-text.
If you think ArcAngel was rolefishing for a day-vig, then you need to play more games to realize just how stupid an accusation that is. Asking for a dayvig on a player, if any tell at all, would be town, not scum.
Again, 4 dayvig mentions, no suggested target, she just fished.
She even admits it here...
In post 407, ArcAngel9 wrote:It was me who is asking for if we have Day vig available in the game, i certainly didn't ask anyone to kill anyone
---
UNVOTE: NJ
VOTE: ArcAngel
Does this sound like a joke to you now, AA?
In post 603, SlySly wrote:In post 602, Bumi wrote:I should be less scummy in your mind. But I'm not? Are you tunnel visioned already?
Why should you be less scummy in my mind? Your AA love is indisputable.
In post 699, Bumi wrote:Sly answer my question please - why is it scummy that I have a town read on ArcAngel?
In post 1165, Ztife wrote:In post 1159, ArcAngel9 wrote:firstly, Wow, Town is having lucky day. A scum who dug his own grave, how often that happens!!!!
And moving on back to scum hunting... I am going to stick the Ztife wagon, Let see if he would like defend himself on this.Vote: ZTife
AJ - Take it easy, I don't think you're scum.
B&B, AJ suspected at the begining but after my justification on following the Thez wagon, his opinion has been changed. He had no reason to change his read on me if he is scum, i am not 100% sure he is a townie but it wouldn't hurt to consider him as one based on his game play.
And congratulations on Sixx, i see your part of effort in his Mod Kill, LOL. nice job!!!
Are you keeping up with the thread?
In post 1238, SlySly wrote:AJ has seemed town to me, but that whole AA interaction seemed very strange to me. I have no problem calling AA scum still, she's done nothing to shake my early suspicions about her; she's only reinforced them.
In post 1243, nhammen wrote:Hi. I got prodded, while on the bus back from Reckoning. It has been a while since my last post, so I will take some time to catch up. My brief skim showed that Sixx flipped scum, even though I had him as null with a slight town lean. Very interesting. I will have to do my catch up with this in mind.
In post 1257, BirdAndBeast wrote:No problem Slysly. But why don't you talk to me about it. Why is AA more voteworthy than Pmysterious?
I honestly think you are town right now (Mastin has some doubts), so lets converse.
Nhammen is probably the best vote today. We are both convinced he was trying to CW Sixx and his posts are really bad posturing. But Ztife needs to full claim next post.
In post 1264, SlySly wrote:@B&B
Why is AA more voteworthy than PMysterious?
1. AA has been scummy in this game.
2. If AA isn't scum, her derptitude makes her a liability to the town.
----
What is your take on what Parama said immediately prior to the modkill?
In post 1285, BirdAndBeast wrote:^ Dear lord, obvtown doesnt come much more obvious than this post.
In post 1289, SlySly wrote:In post 1286, ArcAngel9 wrote:In post 1285, BirdAndBeast wrote:^ Dear lord, obvtown doesnt come much more obvious than this post.
SlySly has become pain in the wrong place... Its frustrates me when people don't have logics and tries to make a connection to it..
that is kind of behaviour is obviously scummy...
How is on the earth he surely knows that i am scum, unless he is the scum and knows that i am townie.
Iso me, your derpness, and you will find I stated why you are scummy long ago. Nothing has changed since then, including the reasoning.
In post 1305, thezmon221 wrote:In regards to me, I find the bolded false. For Ztife though, it is kind of true...In post 1235, ArcAngel9 wrote:Thez, I don't whats your theory but my reasons of voting Ztife wassame as you, he so far has done nothing than let the people accuse him.If he is a townie, so be it.
anybody who acts scum, does things like scum, makes them scum if they're townie.
And whats your theory on SlySly, He has done nothing than just making a scum A list , B list, C list and D list....blah blah on every page than doing any actual scum hunting.
As for SlySly, he reads kind of null to me. He HAS brought in some more discussion and has made some novelty, but sometimes I definitely question the motivation behind his cases. They just sometimes seem... scummy.
What the hell?In post 1239, ArcAngel9 wrote:Good and i got same thoughts on you. Infact, I feel postive that you're trying to frame me becuzI think you know what exactly my role is..that makes you scum
Curious - why do you think the two of us are scummy? I know I quoted a reason which briefly explained the vote on Ztife, but I'm looking for more... substance. On both of us. You like people to present cases of you, so I'd like you to do the same of me, and then one of Ztife.In post 1258, ArcAngel9 wrote:who i still think very scummy is Thez and Ztife, I could be wrong too, but Thez gives a strong defence but Ztife doesn't.
In post 1310, SlySly wrote:I'm not pushing B&B around at all. B&B is a big hydra and is well capable of holding their own.
You don't have a clue if I'm scum or not, you are voting me only because you don't like me/my style.
----
LOL @ B&B:
You are so right, how could I forget the glaring truth? I'm a Day Rolecop and my predecessor just randomly used it on AA! B&B will just not break the connection to AA. B&B stop, let AA defend herself.
B&B how is voting someone just because you don't like their playstyle protown? That's exactly what AA is doing and you know it.