Mew wrote:Any reason you're concerned about the Scum giving themselves away?
I agree with this.In post 15, Vel-Rahn Koon wrote:Fun fact: Activity in this game sucks. Bad. 8 posts in a 48-hour period from only 4 of 8 active players is atrocious.
In other news, darkwolf replaces Knixsilva, who never picked up their role PM.
I'm a forum mafia newb and I think even someone with one braincell could not fall for that.Mew wrote:3. Scum partnered with a newbie and worried they might fall for so simple a page one gambit...? Yeah, this one seems plausible to me.
IMO, this is weak scumhunting. It's like hunting on the surface layer, trying to paint it bad, and not analyzing the motivation layer.In post 22, Mortontfrh wrote:So you're more concerned with the "Experience" rather than actually finding scum?In post 10, ferretlover wrote:Master Mew, I want the Newbies to have an experience of the site; not losing automatically on D2.
And now for a nicely placed first vote;Vote: Ferretlover
I didn't think about it but a darkwold-Morton scumteam is more likely than a MM-Morton scumteam, just for the fact that I think scum try to avoid supporting each other.In post 56, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 54, Nani wrote:- Darkwolf is not scum with MM. ("I agree with MM vote")So you're implying that darkwolf and Morton are a scum team? because that's how i'm seeing this. Considering the main part of the fight is Mew vs ferret.In post 54, Nani wrote:Then Morton gets very quiet and letspeople fight against each other. I don't like this.
Seems a sincere reaction. I thought about it and I identify with that sentiment.In post 67, Nachomamma8 wrote:Why?In post 54, Nani wrote:People who posted that they would not vote for the fear of losing a townperson, are more prob town than normal, IMO. (Pooky and Gameite, IIRC).
In post 145, JasonWazza wrote:VOTE: Master Mew
I think this reasoning for voting Ferret is terrible, your basis for the vote is crap.
The fact that you have sat on it for so long is troubling.
In post 28, Mortontfrh wrote:Alternatively, do you think that it's good play for Town to discourage scum from outing themselves? I wouldn't consider taking an anti-town stance as introducing site meta and good play.In post 24, ferretlover wrote: As an SE it is my job to introduce site meta and good play. It would NOT be good play for scum to out themselves.
(...)
And now for a nicely placed first vote;Vote: Ferretlover
Wait, did you read the game?In post 152, JasonWazza wrote:@ferret, use pressure but don't waste a good vote.
@Sakura Hana: so why aren't you scumhunting through everyone?
I do.In post 164, JasonWazza wrote:Do you realize i am not Morthas?In post 162, Nani wrote:Hey Jason, did you realize that you are voting someone for something that your predecessor Morthas also did?
My stances are pretty clear and explained in my posts:In post 165, StubbsKVM wrote: We only have about 3 days left for a vote, so I'm going to vote for someone who has been slipping under the radar and who has not been around for days.
VOTE: Nani
Nani, can you give me your ideas please?
The fact that you spend posts defending from my "bullshit" means that you care about not getting lynched. Just that posting that in a sentence is "the UTLIAMTE SCUMTELL!!!! 11111In post 204, JasonWazza wrote:That's funny, cause if you read my posts i spend little time defending your bullshit, and more time aggressively hunting for scum.In post 202, Nani wrote:I disagree with this line of logic and makes me wonder if you are hunting real motivations or just theoretic bunch from Mafia 101.
Everyone in this game DOES mind if they get lynched.
Then we wouldn't spend posts on defending from accusations from another players.
Also i love how your trying to destroy an argument based on it being "theoretic".
Are you done making shitty remarks about my play and trying to see if they stick in the wall? Is it a coincidence that my efforts of looking for scum are wanting to get you lynched=?In post 207, JasonWazza wrote:
No it means i care if people misrepresent me to make my case seem less then it is.
Also what makes you think newb scum don't want to get lynched hmm?
I think someone is more motivated to white knight then to actually look for scum.
In post 210, ferretlover wrote: @Nani what are your thoughts about the Stubbs wagon?
- High posting is not indicative of alignment. Your fist vote was on MasterMew who was a very active player. Try again.In post 213, JasonWazza wrote:I'm gonna do a little test for you Nani.
What is my motivation as scum, to be the third highest poster in this game with 10 or so hours of joining it?
What is my motivation as scum, to get the town actually making content?
What is my motivation as scum, to aggressively push the people who are here to actually scumhunt?
WAITIn post 218, JasonWazza wrote:No, No it's not.In post 215, StubbsKVM wrote:Nani's putting herself on the line to make my case.
That's the ultimate town tell.
It's called White Knighting and i will tell you why it's scummy
Player A is town, he does something scummy and Players start voting him, Player B is scum, and he knows that Player A is town so he starts defending him for when Player A finally gets lynched, as there is generally a decent amount of town credit for defending a town player.
Argg although I want Jason lynched with all my heart, this is like the scummiest post in this page.In post 224, Sakura Hana wrote:Well Let's put it this way, if we lynch Stubbs and he flips town then we will go after Jason tomorrow, deal?
P-Edit: woot?
I understand what you are hunting here. Simply put, I don't think this is a scumtell.In post 227, JasonWazza wrote: Trying to appear town again i see.
I did reread but I don't get it.In post 246, Sakura Hana wrote:I already explained why, why dont you re-read?In post 242, Nani wrote:Why are you doing this?
lolwatIn post 267, Sakura Hana wrote:Or if that's too much for you, let's make another gamble, if you flip town then you guys can lynch me tomorrow.
How are we not lynching this?In post 224, Sakura Hana wrote:Well Let's put it this way, if we lynch Stubbs and he flips town then we will go after Jason tomorrow, deal?
P-Edit: woot?
In post 427, StubbsKVM wrote:Let's hope they get on in time
In post 299, Nani wrote:Ok I reread.
There is no way Sakura town could have gone from "Nice job catching that one Jason" and support his Stubbs case to "LOL REACTION TESTING, Vote: Jason"
I simply can't let this happen.
Vote: Sakura.
Who would that be?In post 433, Sakura Hana wrote:I know i can compromise on voting myself if there's not enough voters, but why not lynch scum instead?In post 431, Nani wrote:Can some of you at least compromise on Sakura? I know I won't be around tomorrow.
Why do you have a townread on her?In post 434, Nachomamma8 wrote:I saw that, but it's not enough to destroy my townread on her, sorry.
After all that claim fest that killed Jason and lynched ferret, I really doubt scum would confuse the setup or would automatically assume without thinking in all possibilities. This is more likely a noob town tell.In post 501, Nachomamma8 wrote:We don't know which setup it was, but Stubbs automatically assuming that it was a setup with a One-Shot Bulletproof could mean he's the Mafia Roleblocker.In post 500, Nani wrote:I'm also putting Stubbs as 100% town for his first post of today. If he were scum he would not have confused setups. (he would have known the setup from d1).
Being wrong once, twice, etc, does not mean I am wrong this time. This is some kind and althought is not indicative of alignment, you should be ashamed of using it.In post 501, Nachomamma8 wrote:Why are you so quick to clear people when you tried clearing ferret yesterday and was completely wrong?In post 500, Nani wrote:One thing I know. It's either one of Nacho or Gameite.
+1
I'm going to hate you forever if you are scum, like really.In post 513, T S O wrote:Tell you what: the whole game agrees it's Nacho or Game. So we get Game today, and then Nacho ^_^.
