Mini 1477: Bang! Mafia (Game Over)

[Equinox]

Vote Count 6.1

Not Voting: Amished, killerjester, Majiffy, penguin_alien, pitoli, The Rufflig

With 6 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

Deadline: Saturday, November 30, 2013, at 8:45 PM EST (UTC-5)
Countdown: (expired on 2013-11-30 20:45:00)

[killerjester]

I used hearts. You?

[pitoli]

Mine wasn't clubs.

[Amished]

Well, I used a non-clubs action as well, when we get more information out there I can potentially help determine if stuff is working right.

[Amished]

Non-content related: I'm going on a business trip here this week (leaving tonight) so I'll only have my phone to post on.

[Majiffy]

Hello, I am here.

[Majiffy]

Oh, yeah, zero damage again because loldumbscum.

[killerjester]

We could just lynch Amished or pitoli's guilty to see what the suit-mechanic indicates.

I didn't like Amished's hammer considering that we're in multiball. The fact that he dodged my gambit helps his case slightly but I still think today's lynch is between him and whoever pitoli drew a guilty on

[pitoli]

I'm going to wait to claim my result till everyone gets here if you don't mind. Then I'll explain what I think the discrepancies are given previous investigations.

Does mass claim happen today as well?

[pitoli]

As a side note I'm also very curious to know if town and scum are drawing cards from the same deck....

[Amished]

We could just lynch Amished or pitoli's guilty to see what the suit-mechanic indicates.

I didn't like Amished's hammer considering that we're in multiball. The fact that he dodged my gambit helps his case slightly but I still think today's lynch is between him and whoever pitoli drew a guilty on

Just fyi I was pretty sure renegade referred to a serial killer and not a second team. So don't try to revisionist history me.

[The Rufflig]

Wow! Two guilties right off the bat. I guess I should throw my own 2 cents in - here's a teaser:

Sorry, to be more concise, I'm confused at your question, killer, because I did not visit JS's house last night.

I did!

[penguin_alien]

We could just lynch Amished or pitoli's guilty to see what the suit-mechanic indicates.

I didn't like Amished's hammer considering that we're in multiball. The fact that he dodged my gambit helps his case slightly but I still think today's lynch is between him and whoever pitoli drew a guilty on

Just fyi I was pretty sure renegade referred to a serial killer and not a second team. So don't try to revisionist history me.

Given the source game I'd expect that renegades were independent SK types.

Not dead yet over here.

[pitoli]

Welp, I got a guilty on Penguin_Alien last night.

But there's more to the story if we can agree to massclaim.

[Majiffy]

I also got a guilty on P_A.

[pitoli]

Surprise surprise.

[penguin_alien]

...nice try.

[pitoli]

Claim your action and result if any, please

[Equinox]

Twelve hours have been added to the deadline to compensate for site downtime. The deadline is now Sunday, December 1, 2013, at 8:45 AM EST (UTC-5), which is in (expired on 2013-12-01 08:45:00).

[penguin_alien]

Guilty on Rufflig.

[Amished]

Why did you decide to investigate rufflig?

[penguin_alien]

Because Saki was all over the place, and I didn't have a good sense of Rufflig. I didn't see any reason to investigate you or killerjester or JS, and I figured pitoli was town. Not so sure on that now, but then I think there's something odd with last night's investigations overall, as I have no reason to doubt Majiffy. Maybe someone played a card that randomized or reversed sanities, heck if I know.

[pitoli]

Okay 3 claimed guilties? >>

[Amished]

What made you confident about killer and I? I really haven't felt like I've been doing alot but rufflig really seemed to be getting information out there. He would have been the last choice in another spot.

[The Rufflig]

So, penguin_alien, might I ask why you were so quiet about your "guilty" result? pitoli and killerjester were fairly eager to mention their guilty results. Assuming you have a reason for waiting that leads to another question. If you actually had a guilty result, wouldn't you have said something earlier when the second guilty was laid at your feet? It seems to me that would have been the time to bring up the possibility of false results. Three guilties on three different players should have immediately thrown a red flag in your thought processes. That is when I would have expected to see the faulty investigations argument raised.

VOTE: penguin_alien

---

I wish I could say that I used binoculars last night, but I didn't have one - I used a barrel to re-check JS. I was pretty sure someone else would check p_a. I received an innocent result -- like I needed it given the flip in the thread.

I wasn't shot at last night, which was one pleasant surprise.