I can't believe I
Mini 1596: Minimence I Game Over!!!
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 15, kushm4sta wrote:In post 11, Espressojet wrote:^
It's a joke, you'll get used to him by the end of the thread
...hopefully
Why are you putting words in his mouth and defending him?
Because I know him IRL.
You'll get to know us soon enough-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 19, kushm4sta wrote:In post 17, hiplop wrote:VOTE: boonskies
I would have rather lit my hair on fire than read that first post again
what was so bad about it?
also i have avatars disabled. so rabii go ahead and keep yoru avatar off, I dont mind.
People often identify other people by avatars. Having no avatar means you are harder for me to identify when you post, especially if there's multiple people with no avatar. It lets me slide from game to game and immediately recognize who you are.
People who don't have avatars realize this, and are thus scummier to me.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 24, RedCoyote wrote:I don't read it as antagonistic in the slightest, but you're kind of giving him an "'atta boy", imo.
Like, "don't let these guys bully you, you can have an avatar or not". It just seems like a pretense for you to encourage him or give him positive reinforcement. Also, it was strange for you to butt in when you did as Riabi hasn't even posted yet, much less given an opinion on what Elyse or myself had said.
Like I said, strange.
Strange...
and yet your reaction is stranger.
Trying to start something before page 1 even ends?-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 30, RedCoyote wrote:I mean, I'm lolling at your passive aggressiveness.
"Trying to start something?"
Yeah, Espresso; I'm a troublemaker. Absolutely I want to start something. I want to start lynching scum, how about you?
Isn't that what I'm trying to head towards?
Am I not inherently scumhunting?
If your answer is yes, why did you ask in the first place?-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 34, RedCoyote wrote:It's a rhetorical question. At least, I hoped it would be!
No question is a rhetorical question on these forums to me.
If a question gets asked, answers are expected.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 58, Boonskiies wrote:In post 53, Riabi wrote:VOTE: Bookskiies He's not made a single substantive post, and he's made three posts that serve absolutely no purpose at all.
There is less than three pages on this game. No one has really made a 'substantive post'. There have been plenty of 'no purpose' posts in this game. When I get some major reads, I'll let you know, mmmmkay? Sound good? What's gucci, yo.
2gucci4youcci-
-
Espressojet
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 103, Candice wrote:Yeah, that was a fluke, RC. I could've done better with that and should've. I won't be posting distracted again, sorry. Let me try again.
EspressoJet's posts about RC's stretch really did bother me. Yes it was a stretch to say that suggesting that Riabi get an avatar was coaching, butit was bloody page one. Post 28...
In post 28, Espressojet wrote:The threshold is where someone ACTUALLY does something scummy
Really, really rubs me the wrong way. Again, it's day one, and this was page 2. We start with random votes and knowing nothing at all about each other. The conversation's got to start somewhere and town's got to get scum talking so that they can be tripped up and discovered. Posts 23/25/28 really feel to me like squelching conversation.
Hiplop's posts 54/57 make me go, "Huh?" He misread the post he voted Elyse for but didn't unvote her? And I still want him to give an example of what's wrong with acryon's posts. I mean, I don't need an analysis, that'd just be silly at this point, but just an example would be nice.
Kush... in post 44, he defends EspressoJet by asking if RC was wrong about him coaching Riabi, but that's not what Espresso said. Espresso said that he was calling RC out for "starting something". Then, in post 60, he tries to call out acryon again for saying that EspressoJet was suspicious because Espresso said that he was suspicious because RC tried to start something too early. Well, yes, because that's literally what was said.
Well I DID generate discussion did I not?
Well... not in the direction that I had intended, but everybody started putting their foot forward, and now the game is out of that awkward "What is RVS, anyways?" stage.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 126, Slandaar wrote:In post 91, acryon wrote:
My issue wasneverwith the Espresso's disagreement with the argument of the post. My issue was with his disagreement on the timing of the post, because I felt that disagreement with the timing of the post served to stunt discussion.
OK, the 'starting something' comment does not read fantastically well. it is not a clever line, however, why does it matter what the timing is? What is the difference between saying the exact same thing on page 500?
What are you trying to do? start a wagon with that reasoning?!
(Is basically a translation of what he said)
Don't put words in my mouth. You may not claim my intentions, because they are mine.
My intention was to get people to discuss something. People are a lot easier to read when they aren't sitting idly making jokes and random accusations, but rather when they're arguing, talking, discussing, defending themselves, and accusing others.
I wasn't trying to get anybody lynched or start a wagon. I was trying to get the ball rolling.
And did it work?
With the way you're trying to hunt me down, I would say it did.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 127, acryon wrote:
In post 65, kushm4sta wrote:acryon, a disproportionately large part of your filter is filled with RVS theory and lecturing.
In post 126, Slandaar wrote:My thought is Espresso disagreed with RC to which you disagreed with his disagreement and now I disagree with your disagreement to his disagreement and that in fact is what we are discussing. Why would we want to go back to square 1?
We wouldn't. Regardless of what anyone's thoughts are on the intention or direction of Espressojet's post, I think we can all agree objectively that the more open the discussion, the better chance we are going to find some leads. I don't care about being right and maybe I did misunderstand the post, but I just want to find some scum, hence my post filled with all of my reads because this discussion is past being useful at this point. The past page has been good and productive, let's not regress.
Acryon is my strongest townread at this time.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 207, Boonskiies wrote:No need. I shall talk when I seem it necessary. Just sit back, enjoy, if you ask a question directed at me, I might answer. I will vote when I need to. And interrogate when I feel I should.
VOTE: Boonskiies
Game doesn't revolve around you, man. That's not how things work around here.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 213, DarkLightA wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: EspressoJet
Posted as a single post for effect. Explanation below.
So was it me or Riabi that changed your mind?-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 215, DarkLightA wrote:(Imagine that ^^ post was directly after 211. That's how it was intended.)
(Now Boonskiies ninja'd me, so that fucked it up further)
So, I hear you ask, what prompts this drastic change in action?
Glad you asked. You see, looking through Espresso's ISO, he has produced pretty much as much content as Boonskiies (i.e. ≈zilch). However, he's floating on the pounding we've done on Boonskiies in order to get off a vote. However, the criticism of Boonskiies could have been equally relevant against Espresso.
I also don't like that he says "Well I DID generate discussion did I not?" in post 116. I haven't checked the context in detail, but it seems he is taking credit for other people's discussion, as he has done nothing himself.
Top lel.
Reading the rest now-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 217, DarkLightA wrote:
Why? Why?
Reasons, man. You're not going to persuade anyone by just stating a FoS like that.
"Oh! Boonskiies is suspicious of them! Then they must be scum!"
^^Not gonna happen, sorry.
Fo' reel.
In post 215, DarkLightA wrote:(Imagine that ^^ post was directly after 211. That's how it was intended.)
(Now Boonskiies ninja'd me, so that fucked it up further)
So, I hear you ask, what prompts this drastic change in action?
Glad you asked. You see, looking through Espresso's ISO, he has produced pretty much as much content as Boonskiies (i.e. ≈zilch). However, he's floating on the pounding we've done on Boonskiies in order to get off a vote. However, the criticism of Boonskiies could have been equally relevant against Espresso.
I also don't like that he says "Well I DID generate discussion did I not?" in post 116. I haven't checked the context in detail, but it seems he is taking credit for other people's discussion, as he has done nothing himself.
My vote against Boonskiies is more of a personal vote. I'm not sheeping anybody in my vote for him. He always plays recklessly and does no good for the town no matter which side he's on. I want him to stop.Especially if I have a hydra with him.
PEdit: I am. Especially so.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 223, DarkLightA wrote:In post 221, Espressojet wrote:You should read the thread breh.
It's seems like you're saying this just to attempt to discredit my vote on you. I fail to see where you have produced useful content. And Ihatethat you voted Boonskiies with that reasoning.
H8RZ GONNA H8-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 260, Slandaar wrote:Espresso you must have missed this post; do respond.
In post 134, Slandaar wrote:In post 130, Espressojet wrote:
Don't put words in my mouth. You may not claim my intentions, because they are mine.
My intention was to get people to discuss something. People are a lot easier to read when they aren't sitting idly making jokes and random accusations, but rather when they're arguing, talking, discussing, defending themselves, and accusing others.
So, you don't actually disagree with RC's point then? you made it up to start discussion?
In post 130, Espressojet wrote:
I wasn't trying to get anybody lynched or start a wagon. I was trying to get the ball rolling.
And did it work?
With the way you're trying to hunt me down, I would say it did.
I am trying to hunt you down?
Sorry, man, I must have.
I said that RC's comment was a stretch. Ibroughtit up to start discussion.
Perhaps hunt me down isn't the right term, but after I made a single comment, one of which many people agreed with, but even still it had no major relevance to the game, you kept talking about me and accusing me of things. Sure felt like you were out for blood.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 292, Slandaar wrote:In post 285, Espressojet wrote:
I said that RC's comment was a stretch. Ibroughtit up to start discussion.
Did you lie about your disagreement to start discussion? or do you believe it was a bad/weak whatever argument?
What disagreement?
In post 285, Espressojet wrote:accusing me of things.
What have I accused you of? (quotes required)
I just iso'd you. I remember there being more, but I guess I was wrong. Sorry I accused you of "hunting me down" when you were clearly not. my bad :/
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 294, DarkLightA wrote:In post 293, RedCoyote wrote:DLA 276 wrote:Boonskiies is a town troller. EspressoJet is more scummy IMO.
Is it your contention that Espresso is trying to mimick Boonskiies as scum and kind of do a "We're both just being goofy townies! "?
Or, like, do you think he's trying to buddy up to Boonskiies in a weird way by appealing to a sense of hydra camaraderie?
I'm kind of confused as to how you got here, help me understand.
Absolutely. The exchange took place in page 9 and 10.
Towards the end of page 8 and start of page 9 I had been going hard at Boonskiies for not contributing. Acryon jumped on and pushed a bit himself, which I'm fine with. Then EspressoJet comes in with the following post:
In post 210, Espressojet wrote:In post 207, Boonskiies wrote:No need. I shall talk when I seem it necessary. Just sit back, enjoy, if you ask a question directed at me, I might answer. I will vote when I need to. And interrogate when I feel I should.
VOTE: Boonskiies
Game doesn't revolve around you, man. That's not how things work around here.
...apparently criticizing Boonskiies in much the same way we had been doing previously, and hitting him with a vote at the same time. I explain this in 215. The striking thing is that EspressoJet had produced no significant content, much like BoonSkiies,yet was voting BoonSkiies for not contributing. This hypocrisy is what sparked my vote.
He attempts an ad hominem in post 221, backs off in 222, and has forgotten all about our exchange by 236.
Hold up, what? That is not at all why I'm voting Boonskiies!
I'm voting Boonskiies because hesaid"I choose to actively not participate"-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 296, Elyse wrote:I agree that Espresso is scummy and seems like he's trying to link himself to Boon despite voting him for it already. I think he initially thought he might be able to mislynch Boon and then realized he could use Boon to make himself look town.
Boon's not getting lynched any time soon, and I'm not pushing for a lynch on him at all, so where did you come to this conclusion?-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 301, DarkLightA wrote:It was quite clear that you were riding the momentum. And seriously, I feel like I'm debating the same thing with you over and over and over again.
In post 239, Espressojet wrote:Ah, sorry, I forgot your argument because I discarded it immediately.
Is that recurring?
What momentum? I could feel no momentum at the time. And even if there was, where did it all go? Momentum doesn't just disappear, that's not how science works!
And yeah, happens on occasion. Sometimes I overcompensate for it by responding to things I don't need to.
In post 303, Bicephalous Bob wrote:espresso, are you able to accurately read boon?
I have played mafia on and offline with Boon since we both started playing. We even recently created a three person setup and proceeded to spend the ENTIRE night playing it until 8:30 in the morning.
I don't believe there is a man alive who can accurately read Boonskiies.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 307, DarkLightA wrote:I feel like this taking the discussion in this direction is counterproductive. You're attacking my words instead of my argument.
Are you fucking kidding me?
Your argument against my vote is that I'm "riding momentum" of which I amclearlydisputing that I cannot ride momentum when there is no momentum to ride in the first place.
I am beingvoted, and not just by you, so if defending myself is counterproductive then I may as well just sit here and twiddle my fucking thumbs while you call me scum.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 312, DarkLightA wrote:You voted him in RVS. Then you voted RC. Then you voted him again as a policy vote?
Is that your explanation?
I'm going with yes.
In post 314, Slandaar wrote:In post 297, Espressojet wrote:In post 292, Slandaar wrote:In post 285, Espressojet wrote:
I said that RC's comment was a stretch. Ibroughtit up to start discussion.
Did you lie about your disagreement to start discussion? or do you believe it was a bad/weak whatever argument?
What disagreement?
RC's comment being a stretch; you disagreed with RC's argument;
Did you lie about your disagreement to start discussion? or do you believe it was a bad/weak whatever argument?
Explain it to me.
In post 297, Espressojet wrote:
I just iso'd you. I remember there being more, but I guess I was wrong. Sorry I accused you of "hunting me down" when you were clearly not. my bad :/
When you say more you mean 'I remember there being something but apparently I am delusional and you never accused me of anything' Right?
I thought his comment was a bit of a stretch. Do I really have to say any more? I wasn't wrong in that statement.
And yes, you are correct. I am a dimmy dim dummy dumb and I made an oopsie. Please ignore my accusations of your accusations because I was wrong.-
-
Espressojet
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
I don't like you already.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 369, Slandaar wrote:In post 130, Espressojet wrote:
Don't put words in my mouth. You may not claim my intentions, because they are mine.
My intention was to get people to discuss something. People are a lot easier to read when they aren't sitting idly making jokes and random accusations, but rather when they're arguing, talking, discussing, defending themselves, and accusing others.
This is you saying I am misrepresenting you.
So, go back and respond to my questions, thank you.
Explain to me why this is still relevant to you, because I see no reason for you to continue interrogating every minute detail of my actions. It feels to me like you're trying to make it look like you're scumhunting.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 378, Slandaar wrote:In post 375, Espressojet wrote:
Explain to me why this is still relevant to you, because I see no reason for you to continue interrogating every minute detail of my actions. It feels to me like you're trying to make it look like you're scumhunting.
Lets summarise what happened here; You misread my post badly showing no attention to the game at all. Acryon then white knights your post saying I am wrong to which I ask him if he agrees with your representation of what I said and he crumbles into 'I don't understand I don't understand!' You then decide Acryon is your top town read for defending your ridiculously bad post.
So, we are currently breaking down your really bad post to make sure I am correct in that you had literally no clue what was being said when you made your response.
I hope you are clear now.
While we are on the subject of scumhunting, where is yours?
I'm sorry that I happen to be busy swatting down every thrust and blow coming from your direction.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 130, Espressojet wrote:In post 126, Slandaar wrote:In post 91, acryon wrote:
My issue wasneverwith the Espresso's disagreement with the argument of the post. My issue was with his disagreement on the timing of the post, because I felt that disagreement with the timing of the post served to stunt discussion.
OK, the 'starting something' comment does not read fantastically well. it is not a clever line, however, why does it matter what the timing is? What is the difference between saying the exact same thing on page 500?
What are you trying to do? start a wagon with that reasoning?!
(Is basically a translation of what he said)
Don't put words in my mouth.You may not claim my intentions, because they are mine.
My intention was to get people to discuss something. People are a lot easier to read when they aren't sitting idly making jokes and random accusations, but rather when they're arguing, talking, discussing, defending themselves, and accusing others.
I wasn't trying to get anybody lynched or start a wagon. I was trying to get the ball rolling.
And did it work?
With the way you're trying to hunt me down, I would say it did.
This was it.
This was all.
All you had to fucking do was ISO me.-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 400, Slandaar wrote:
Yes, thank you, I know what you said in that post. The issue is you are replying thinking I am calling you scum which I wasn't. During which period you also say my interpretation of your post is wrong. I just want to understand how I am wrong.
Just answer my questions which can be found Here
It should only take you 2 minutes not sure why this is such a big deal for you.
I NEVER SAID I WAS CALLING YOU SCUM HOLY FUCK.
This is a fucking big deal because you're asking the shittiest questions, and you WONT. FUCKING. STOP.
How am I supposed to try and get anything done this game when I spend all of my time sifting through the thread to find these stupid goddamn answers for your stupid goddamn questions?-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
In post 413, Salamence20 wrote:In post 411, DarkLightA wrote:Huh... But now the post numbers in my quote make it look like I'm quoting myself
Talking to yourself is a normal thing.
I can't stay mad around you, Sally-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
-
-
Espressojet Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: July 1, 2014
-
-
-
-
-