NY 186: Mafia In Japan - Mafia Victory!

[PMysterious]

It's still basically RVS. Nero and I don't get along.

Then explain why you say it's D1 Policy, or mandatory. Have any past experience you can give about your encounters, Emporor Kuzco?

[Nero Cain]

No, sadly, I'm not Scum with anyone, I'm all Town.

It still looks suspiciously similar to the way you attacked me for attacking your scumbuddy House.

But Boon being a revisionist is the same thing HE did last time as scum too.

[ConManMick]

Are you guys using meta purely for RVS votes or is it going to factor into your play for the entirety of the game?

[Nero Cain]

my RVS vote on IKA is absolutely policy.

Kling and PM might be ok lynches, idk yet.

[ConManMick]

Treat me like I'm stupid here;
Policy vote or you think IKA should be policy lynch?

[Nero Cain]

I think IKA should be policy lynched

[ConManMick]

Is it not a week bit early to be going about a policy lynch?

[Nero Cain]

What is your town motivation in wanting to keep a player that hammers at l1 irregardless?

[Nero Cain]

No, sadly, I'm not Scum with anyone, I'm all Town.

It still looks suspiciously similar to the way you attacked me for attacking your scumbuddy House.

but also, if you think I am scum then why no vote?

[Boonskiies]

It's not irregardless. Day 1 there's literally nothing. If someone gets put to L-1, why the fuck not hammer? People are obviously okay with it. I mainly only do it Day 1, not "irregardless". My main way to scum hunt is by analyzing flips and add them to vote counts/associations. There is your town motivation.

[Nero Cain]

Why are you answering a question directed at, Mick?

[Nero Cain]

also ignore comma

[ConManMick]

I was unaware of that particular playstle feature, thank you for making me aware of it.
I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that "irregardless" contradicts itself and technically actually means "regarding". The word you are looking for is just "regardless".
So hypothetically boon, you're at L-1. Do you self hammer?

[Kaboose]

So far I'm scum reading everyone. I feel like the mod's next post may endgame me.

[Boonskiies]

I was unaware of that particular playstle feature, thank you for making me aware of it.
I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that "irregardless" contradicts itself and technically actually means "regarding". The word you are looking for is just "regardless".
So hypothetically boon, you're at L-1. Do you self hammer?

If I town read the person, I'm not going to hammer them. If it's Day 1, and I am not getting townie vibes, and they are already at L-1, why not hammer them? Give me a good reason why I shouldn't hammer someone Day 1 who is null-lean scum who everyone else has already put, and seemingly okay with, them being at L-1?

[Kaboose]

I'm siding with boonskies on this one.

In my opinion, town start with the information of just themselves. Where scum start with information on themselves and the town.

A D1 that can end with just a swift hammer can only help the town close the information gap that gives the scum the advantage to start every game.

If it's someone I town read with good reason I wouldn't hammer, but like he said someone with scum vibes who has already played well enough to be at L1 should just be offed.

Too often I see town's run people to L1, get a claim, back off, run the next person up to L1, get a claim, back off... All that does is help scum fill in their gaps. They don't have that many to fill in. While town can only take people's word for everything. They won't be able to confirm those answers until a flip.

The game starts on D2, the quicker you get there and begin working the better for town.

[ika]

so i got a townread on boon, evilpac, and kaboose

more to come after work bout to head out

[ConManMick]

That doesn't sound like quick hammering to me

[Nero Cain]

Give me a good reason why I shouldn't hammer someone Day 1 who is null-lean scum who everyone else has already put, and seemingly okay with, them being at L-1?

Argumentum ad populum

I think that someone should ATLEAST get a final post.

If they are scum their final post may have clues
if town they may have some things to that will help
their claim may make us not want to lynch them

the idea that town is so much better off on day 2 with atleast one flip is p ridiculous and is not (IMO) a valid reason to quick hammer.

but I don't really want to have a theory discussion.

[pisskop]

Im just offended Nero's applying past experience w/an alt to me. He's as good a flip as any, esp considering how he's a just entrenched himself into dramak

[pisskop]

It's still basically RVS. Nero and I don't get along.

Then explain why you say it's D1 Policy, or mandatory. Have any past experience you can give about your encounters, Emporor Kuzco?

Why does Boon's have to answer this but Nero doesnt?

[WoodyWoodpecker]

vote: Nero

[Radja]

Policy lynch on day 1? How would that be a good strategy? We'll have no information to go on day 2.

[Nero Cain]

It's still basically RVS. Nero and I don't get along.

Then explain why you say it's D1 Policy, or mandatory. Have any past experience you can give about your encounters, Emporor Kuzco?

Why does Boon's have to answer this but Nero doesnt?

I've already explained why I am voting IKA and in lieu of any good scum suspects (besides maybe celt) it is currently the best vote.

[waxing and wanding]

It's more about style than words, for both of you.

What about Nero's style makes you read him as scum here?