Newbie 1715 (Game Over)

crazycrabman · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 7:41 am

I unvoted my vote so you should take it up with whoever still has you voted for.

Zaicon · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 8:55 am

Vote Count 1.2 of Kysville

Creature (3):

LicketyQuickety, Dwlee99, Dragon of the West

Dwlee99 (1):

SirCakez

crazycrabman (1):

Creature

No Vote (3):

atm487, crazycrabman, eagerSnake, tojam2

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch!

Deadline is Friday, June 24, at 4:00 PM CST, which is in (expired on 2016-06-24 16:00:00).

atm487 · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:41 am

ok wait, i tried to vote and it wouldnt let me it never showed the white box around it

ISO · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:51 am

In post 41, Creature wrote:It's a reaction test, I don't want to wait something happen in this boring RVS.

What did your test reveal?

In post 42, Dwlee99 wrote:Cakey are you scum?

Nope
I hate being scum in Newbie games ftr, it feels bad fooling them

In post 44, Creature wrote:tojam2 noticed he got a scum PM with so few newbies around and ran away.

rofl if this is true

In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:Checking his profile and seeing his age I wouldn't be surprised if he got grounded or something similar.

rofl x 2

In post 62, eagerSnake wrote:Hello all

Nothing more to say then this?

If one of the SEs is going to IC temporarily then it should be Dwlee, he's most experienced.

ISO · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:52 am

In post 83, tojam2 wrote:PLEASE DONT PROD ME!

Sorry, I'm really tired right now as I've just got back from a shooting competition (and no I didn't win any medals).

Hi, I'm Tom and I'm the IC (Inexperience Challenger) for this game.
My job is to make sure that you learn how to play the game and the dynamics of the game mafia (hopefully without sounding too much like a smart-arse).
I am usually active around 3-4pm GMT and available to answer most questions you have.

Once, again I apologise for having been away for 2 days (ish).

This feels kind of icky, not sure why.

In post 86, eagerSnake wrote:How do we find out who is sdum?

I think this is blatantly newbtown.

VOTE: Tojam
for now

eagerSnake · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:54 am

Why has nobody answered my question as to how we find scum?

Creature · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:57 am

Dwlee Dwlee Dwlee

ISO · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:57 am

We find scum by scumhunting! Questioning each other, analyzing posts, etc. Look for behaviors that you think mafia would do. For example, someone who is constantly posting small posts that add no real contribution, or someone who is avoiding looking for scum.

Creature · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:00 am

In post 83, tojam2 wrote: Sorry, I'm really tired right now as I've just got back from a shooting competition (and no I didn't win any medals).

I understand, being scum is tiring.

Creature · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:02 am

SirCakez, I disagree.

Creature · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:03 am

You should see who's trying to pose like town.

ISO · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:06 am

Disagree with what?

Creature · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:07 am

Your example.

ISO · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:08 am

Oh that, I thought you meant my vote on Tojam.
Why do you disagree?

Creature · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:12 am

I don't want to be discriminated for making short posts.

ISO · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:13 am

Short posts are fine, I do them a lot.
It's if the posts aren't adding anything (a.k.a fluff) that I'd get suspicious.

Creature · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:16 am

In that case I agree, but I don't see scum fluffposting nowadays.

I'd be surprised if scum weren't posting once in a blueb moon a lenghty noise post.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:45 am

@crazycrabman,

Why did you unvote so fast?

crazycrabman · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:48 am

In post 117, LicketyQuickety wrote:@crazycrabman,

Why did you unvote so fast?

Because the vote's intention was to get a reaction and when that intention was out in the open, the vote served no purpose.

eagerSnake · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:00 am

I get it... so basically we just try to see who is acting like us and that's how we'll know who is town and people who answer questions or act different are most likely scum.

Creature · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:02 am

eageSnake, did you find any scum?

crazycrabman · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:03 am

Pretty much. The wiki here has some good info about helping to determine who's scum~ http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... ory:Theory

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:06 am

In post 118, crazycrabman wrote:
In post 117, LicketyQuickety wrote:@crazycrabman,

Why did you unvote so fast?
Because the vote's intention was to get a reaction and when that intention was out in the open, the vote served no purpose.

You could have kept the vote on and said you got a scummy reaction as an added layer. You didn't want to create too much Wifom is that why you didn't to that? What did atms reaction tell you? Obviously it looks like you are saying you think they gave a Townie reaction or you would have kept the vote on them correct?

Creature · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:10 am

Let's help crazycrabman make a case on someone.

crazycrabman · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:13 am

In post 122, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 118, crazycrabman wrote:
In post 117, LicketyQuickety wrote:@crazycrabman,

Why did you unvote so fast?
Because the vote's intention was to get a reaction and when that intention was out in the open, the vote served no purpose.
You could have kept the vote on and said you got a scummy reaction as an added layer. You didn't want to create too much Wifom is that why you didn't to that? What did atms reaction tell you? Obviously it looks like you are saying you think they gave a Townie reaction or you would have kept the vote on them correct?

I stated my intentions before I could get a reaction. A scum player, once seeing the intention of the vote, would act differently than if the intention was not known. That being said, a do find it a bit scummy that he kept pressing me about the vote, and even said he had three votes on him when in reality there was none.

In post 99, atm487 wrote: to be fair, your right, but still, why not try someone else instead me, i have almost 3 votes on my now correct?