STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

McMenno · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:22 pm

In post 331, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 313, Skybird wrote:
In post 302, Yume wrote:
In post 300, Skybird wrote:
In post 193, Yume wrote:
In post 191, Skybird wrote:So who would like to ally with me?
I would be okay with that engagement
I'm up for this if you are still willing.
Too late, farside and I are allied and next day I am planning alliance with RR.
yeah, I saw that as I caught up. maybe day three then?
If there's not some strong reason to do otherwise, sure. You understand why we want to sort Titus and Yume first yeah?

@Farside - I just realized I didn't say anything to your earlier question. You remember what happened in original SU right? Like ... we were able to figure out and be sure you were town when the whole freaking game was sure you were scum. You're not a priority for us to sort right away. You are a solid person to ally with later if we both survive that long and once we have enough to go on to read you. We worked great together in original SU, but that was late mid-game. We're more focused on figuring out slots that are harder for us to figure out early on. Nothing personal.

~D

misinterpreted this post at first, but I still don't like it.

In post 345, mastin2 wrote:Oh.
I just read a clause in my role PM.

Yeah, I'm not allowing anyone to ally with me, ever.
There's something in there that I missed before, which now that I've read, has rendered any chance of me ever having interest in allying gone.
The power I have is a massive boost to scum but useless to town, so I am NOT giving it away, ever.

that's okay

In post 356, Varsoon wrote:
An ability in the game has confirmed that Farside22 is NOT in a Masonry with Firebringer.
The Stress has increased by 1, towards 'Tragic Destiny'. The current stress is +1.

this is stupid

In post 373, Obi-Wan Kenobi wrote:How is McMenno strange? Let's poke there more. See if we cannot get clearer thoughts.

I'm okay with this

In post 396, Klingoncelt wrote:On the subject of Alliances, who's unattached? I don't want to be all alone.

I'm unattached but not sure if I want to ally with you right now; let's see if cakez declines

In post 399, grapes wrote:is grapes gonna need to play matchmaker with the lurkfucks or what people?

the thread has been unlocked for less than 24 hours and people have lives you know

@cakez would you be interested in an alliance, obi-wan is already taken. I promise you that it will be a very lucrativre endeavor for you, I'll spill the beans in the pt

Firebringer · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 8:54 pm

In post 356, Varsoon wrote:
An ability in the game has confirmed that Farside22 is NOT in a Masonry with Firebringer.
The Stress has increased by 1, towards 'Tragic Destiny'. The current stress is +1.

Hahahahahahahhaaha

Firebringer · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:00 pm

In post 387, Shiro wrote:Dear people that are voting,

You can't actually vote.

With regards,
Shiro.

This is a great Shiro post.

With salad,
Firebringer

Klingoncelt · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:06 pm

In post 398, grapes wrote:Alliances:
grapes/chara
fire/shiro
obi/rr
skybird/foxbird
cakes/a50
yume/farside

Unaligned:
Creature
SnarkySnowman
randomidget
Seraphim
Xkfyu
CooLDoG
killthestory
McMenno
TheWayItEnds
DrippingGoofball
Klingoncelt
kraskaesque

Thank you, Grapes!

Klingoncelt · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:07 pm

In post 399, grapes wrote:is grapes gonna need to play matchmaker with the lurkfucks or what people?

There sure are a lot of us that are unattached.

grapes · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:09 pm

Klingon I find it weird that obi and I both called you scum last page and you didn't OMGUS us. What are your thoughts on that thought?

Firebringer · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:10 pm

In post 405, grapes wrote:Klingon I find it weird that obi and I both called you scum last page and you didn't OMGUS us. What are your thoughts on that thought?

Can I respond to this?

grapes · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:12 pm

Or rather. Made no response to it at all.

And could you wait a minute?

Firebringer · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:13 pm

Firebringer is impatient.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:13 pm

In post 400, McMenno wrote:
In post 396, Klingoncelt wrote:On the subject of Alliances, who's unattached? I don't want to be all alone.
I'm unattached but not sure if I want to ally with you right now; let's see if cakez declines

@cakez would you be interested in an alliance, obi-wan is already taken. I promise you that it will be a very lucrativre endeavor for you, I'll spill the beans in the pt

Sir Cakes is allied with A50, I think.

Firebringer · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:15 pm

Sometimes the way Klingon plays is frustrating, because you want to have a conversation with her now.
Sometimes it's hilarious because she is just rambling about something no one is talking about.

Right now it's funny.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:16 pm

In post 405, grapes wrote:Klingon I find it weird that obi and I both called you scum last page and you didn't OMGUS us. What are your thoughts on that thought?

Titus can't read me for shit, so that doesn't matter.

I must have missed your read. I'm not Scum, but why do you think I am?

And Firebringer is making a bad name for himself. I think he's Scum.

Firebringer · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:17 pm

In post 411, Klingoncelt wrote:And Firebringer is making a bad name for himself. I think he's Scum.

Lol kk

Shiro · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:18 pm

In post 410, Firebringer wrote:Sometimes it's hilarious because she is just rambling about something no one is talking about.

That space dandy talk about half the game ago xD

Klingoncelt · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:19 pm

Sorry. It's how I catch up in every game. :'(

Firebringer · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:22 pm

In post 414, Klingoncelt wrote:Sorry. It's how I catch up in every game. :'(

Don't be sorry, it's cute.

Shiro · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:23 pm

In post 414, Klingoncelt wrote:Sorry. It's how I catch up in every game. :'(

Ik ik, it was still hilarious cause people were trying to talk to you but you kept going ignoring it all and answering like half an hour later XD

Klingoncelt · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:23 pm

Thank you.

grapes · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:23 pm

In post 411, Klingoncelt wrote:I must have missed your read. I'm not Scum, but why do you think I am?

And Firebringer is making a bad name for himself. I think he's Scum.

I didn't like the question you asked me but I don't really feel that strongly about it anymore.

Why do you think fire is scum?

Klingoncelt · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:24 pm

In post 416, Shiro wrote:
In post 414, Klingoncelt wrote:Sorry. It's how I catch up in every game. :'(
Ik ik, it was still hilarious cause people were trying to talk to you but you kept going ignoring it all and answering like half an hour later XD

Yeah, I'm kinda OCD like that.

Firebringer · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:25 pm

Shiro what's your read on RR?

Klingoncelt · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:25 pm

In post 418, grapes wrote:
In post 411, Klingoncelt wrote:I must have missed your read. I'm not Scum, but why do you think I am?

And Firebringer is making a bad name for himself. I think he's Scum.
I didn't like the question you asked me but I don't really feel that strongly about it anymore.

Why do you think fire is scum?

Too trolly, not solve-y.

Firebringer · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:26 pm

In post 421, Klingoncelt wrote:Too trolly, not solve-y.

Ummmmmmmm now I think your scum.

Klingoncelt · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:27 pm

In post 422, Firebringer wrote:
In post 421, Klingoncelt wrote:Too trolly, not solve-y.
Ummmmmmmm now I think your scum.

Because you're being trolly?

Firebringer · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:28 pm

In post 423, Klingoncelt wrote:
In post 422, Firebringer wrote:
In post 421, Klingoncelt wrote:Too trolly, not solve-y.
Ummmmmmmm now I think your scum.
Because you're being trolly?

Because "trolly" isn't alignment indicative of me and I have no idea since when you would assume that out of the dozen of games we have played together.