BlackVoid is using a whole bunch of small misreps and fallacies in his recent posts. (More so than before; probably he's trying to jack up the rhetoric out of desperation.)
I hate to nitpick, but all the broad arguments have already been made.
In post 689, BlackVoid wrote:1. Someone noticing a connection between two scum is a reason
not
to bus because the cred would be limited as people still wonder after the flip.
This is AT LEAST balanced by the suspicion put on such a pair if a mislynch occurs outside it. Even if the two of them managed to secure a mislynch (me, as he suggests was most feasible), the fact that such a connection was called out and then both players pushed a mislynch looks horrible for them. The only way to contest such a pairing is to try to prove it wrong.
5. What motivation do I have to "test the winds" for a Prohawk lynch as opposed to just townread him so he's not even on the lynch table to begin with?
It wasn't hard to tell that I might switch to ProHawk. I had had Dunhallym as lowest with ProHawk second, and I had just started to lay off of Dunhallym. If you townread him and I come out with a case on him, even if people aren't convinced that strengthens the connection between you two.
I mean, your theory is that I bussed Prohawk to make it more difficult for me to win because a guy you know likes making absurd plays... If you honestly think I'd be setting up absurd challenges for myself and messing up my sleep schedule for nothing when I could have just teamed up with Prohawk and won, you're jumping through hoops to see me as scum when I'm not.
Vastly oversimplifying the situation.
In post 691, BlackVoid wrote:Smart's whole "he could have switched away from Prohawk" is just trying to play on your paranoia. Anyone could have hypothetically changed their reads at any time. But I didn't. I voted Prohawk, I stuck to it and ensured he got lynched when not doing so would mean a very likely win were I scum.
BV didn't ensure ProHawk got lynched, he put him at L-1 and Grey lolhammered.
And by the way, anyone can hypothetically change their reads at any time. But it's a heck of a lot easier if they don't have a vote down.
In post 696, BlackVoid wrote:I've been trying to explain this but here's the major difference between Tenshii and Smart - Tenshii never posted strategically to avoid prods. He posted when he could. He got prodded from time to time. When he was engaging Prohawk, he posted a lot in a short time frame. It was unself-conscious and natural. He WAS replaced out. Smart is still here. Can you see the difference? That's because Smart was posting just enough to stay in the game. There's a difference between inactive players and active lurkers.
That's only because I have the commitment to avoid getting replaced due to inactivity. And, incidentally, my activity was anything but active lurking-- active lurking entails posting infrequently and providing very little content.
In post 697, BlackVoid wrote:I've been trying extremely hard to sell you on Smart as scum because he is and I need to do that to win the game for town. I'd probably also need to do it if I were scum so it's null. Right now, both me and Smart are in identical situations where we both need to get the other lynched in order to win whereas you win by choosing correctly.
...
His major advantage is that he knew you entered the day pre-biased towards him so if he could just respond to questions and survives, he would be fine. His play I think would actually be majorly different if he were town. I think he'd check in more often, he'd be a little more concerned with how things are going.
Funny how he makes the first argument when it suits him, and then makes the second argument conveniently ignoring the fact that it's also completely true regardless of my alignment.
In post 699, BlackVoid wrote: In post 695, Ms Columbo wrote:The things you indicate you would only do as town are things I've watched scum do.
Are you saying you've never seen scum coast through the game when town argue amongst themselves?
This is some kind of fallacy, asserting that just because something is possible that therefore it is likely. Also handwaving Columbo's point.
In post 704, BlackVoid wrote:You are not even trying to figure the game out anymore. You are paranoid that I could be playing a wonderful scumgame, probably because I remind you of someone who does.
More fallacy and misrep.