[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10548285 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null [Game Over] Newbie 1900 - Robocalypse - Mafiascum.net
The Transformer's behaviour towards me, given our last game together, seemed very natural. This also seemed like the only decent attempt at engagement in the experiment so far, so that was good.
I have a completed town game (Mini 2040), although the circumstances there were pretty different. You could give it a read. There's a lot of content from my profile that you could use to judge the AI-ness (Heheh) of my tone in general *by yourself*. What do you make of my reaction, though?
My vote was an RVS vote, I could've simply replaced the roleplay with "Hey, a robot avatar! VOTE". The voting and subsequent hopeful flashwagoning was to generate content and test for reactions, yes. Not a result of a scumread. I do find Lamees' reaction to the OMGUS part interesting.
IMO RVS sheeping at least isn't AI at all, I think it's a good thing actually. At least in terms of a starting point for serious play. Thor's sheeping was contextually different, he was clear that he townread you after your defence and moved his vote.
What do you think? How do you think scum!sheeping would play out over the course of a day? You don't have to answer the second part, just keep that in mind.
Can you give more details about what you found interesting?
In post 58, Lamees wrote:Can you give more details about what you found interesting?
So far, WRT your play:
- Calling me scummy for *mentioning* OMGUS
- Stressing on the NAI-ness of OMGUS, and questioning FL's sheep (which was before my post)
- Ignoring my reasons for wagoning
- "Time for me to get out of RVS" without actually placing a vote with a serious basis
- False unvote?
Answer me this, Lamees:
1. You still think RVS wagoning isn't good?
2. Do you scumread me?
3. If you're getting out of RVS, what are your serious reads?
4. Opinions on FL's sheeping?
I didn't call you scummy. Let alone scummy for mentioning omgus. I said FLs sheeping which I guess can be classified as "blind sheeping" looks scummy. Anyway I changed my mind about it since it's NAI.
1. I just came from a game where there was RVS lynch (yes lynch not wagon lol). The lynch It actually happened to be scum. So I think it can be good but there's definitely a higher chance for the lynch to be scum if the wagon isn't RVS.
2. No (but not town read either)
3. So far not much. I'd say yuriko is town maybe. Since L-2 with not much defensive posting from her side.
4. I think he hasnt voted seriously yet. So wont look too much into it
Why mention one player in your RVS post but then RV someone else completely? Why did you choose random to vote?
Hey ariane.
It was a joke about how I find a name like not_mafia to be a player that isn't mafia because it's in the name. So I random voted randomaccess since the word random is in the name it was a suitable random vote.
In post 109, Lamees wrote:Why? Reading previous games isn't my style. I play the current game. Only time I use past games is if I was in the game personally.
Meta means nothing to you?
Okay, take it from me - Not_Mafia does this every game. Your scumread on him for his ISO on this game alone is *wrong*.
Apart from a weak early jab at Flavor, you're just comfortably settling into a tunnel based on an incorrect meta-ignorant read, no?
There's plenty of time left. This is not even close to a tunnel forming.
Post
Post #146 (isolation #18) » Mon Nov 19, 2018 11:13 pm
Postby Lamees »
In post 145, Auro wrote:Lamees, give me good reason to vote Not_Mafia and I will.
You said FL should have pushed me instead of NM and the reason was because he inst going to defend himself? So what if he is scum? You're going to give him a free pass because he does this in all of his games?
Post
Post #153 (isolation #21) » Mon Nov 19, 2018 11:58 pm
Postby Lamees »
I've been the second most active user in the thread. I am trying to engage and get a lynch. NM is the one not properly engaging, that is not my fault. You are giving him a free pass, even more than that, you're defending him on multiple occasions. I don't see how that helps at all. I wouldnt mind turning it into NM vs lamees and all players have to choose to vote either me or him. But FL vs ariane looks more interesting. Not sure I would know who to vote there, hope we get more content from them soon.
UNVOTE: not_mafia
Reserving vote for FL vs ariane. (Willing to put my scum read on hold for a chance for us to get a lynch together)
Post
Post #169 (isolation #24) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:42 am
Postby Lamees »
Lol ok. But he is using an out dated reason for a vote. I guess if he is town this is his way of ensuring he won't get night killed. I still think we shouldnt all scatter our votes around. We can settle on FL vs auro then.
Post
Post #183 (isolation #25) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:11 am
Postby Lamees »
Haha none taken. But in that game you were scum and I wanted to lynch you day 1. So how is that anti town? I'd say what was anti town was bbmolla, the guy just kept his vote on me for the entire game. Eventually forcing me to scum read him. And then I got lynched and town lost. Which is why no matter how accurately one reads the game, if town cannot work together it's pointless.
In post 183, Lamees wrote:Haha none taken. But in that game you were scum and I wanted to lynch you day 1. So how is that anti town? I'd say what was anti town was bbmolla, the guy just kept his vote on me for the entire game. Eventually forcing me to scum read him. And then I got lynched and town lost. Which is why no matter how accurately one reads the game, if town cannot work together it's pointless.
What I had in mind wasn't your reads -- your posts in D2 made you an obvlynch that game. This is a separate discussion, tho -- I've since attributed that it's just playstyle.
Post
Post #205 (isolation #27) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:47 am
Postby Lamees »
VOTE: auro
Yeah yeah I know, opportunistic. I mean, we need 5 votes so of course any vote after the first or second one is now gonna get called opportunistic as a defense mechanism and because it's the in-word. Good luck getting 5 votes without being called opportunistic though lol.
I just don't think auro has taken this vote pressure from FL well. He is kinda flailing imo, he was all about votes for pressure but when it's on him the pressure was a bit too much. Pair that with the feeling I have that he has been prodding me all game in hopes I say something scummy for him to latch onto. High chance we got scum here. Also I really dont mind auro vs lamees too. So we can do that. By all means vote me if you think I'm scum.
Post
Post #208 (isolation #28) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 8:58 am
Postby Lamees »
@auro You have been trying, and after the FL vote you confirmed it to me, that you were lining me up as the next scum target after the volxen wagon lost momentum.
Post
Post #211 (isolation #29) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:01 am
Postby Lamees »
In post 209, snowbeast wrote:From real life experience when we question suspected poachers the innocent have one solid story and the guilty bounce around under pressure
What do you think of auros reaction to FLs vote on him then?
Post
Post #216 (isolation #30) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 9:06 am
Postby Lamees »
In post 210, Auro wrote:Lamees, do you think I engage only in defense?
If I was lining you up as the next scum target, why would I vote for FL instead of voting for you? Or do you mean the next target after scum!me gets FL lynched, in which case - why would I attribute scummy looking posts of yours as NAI?
That's the thing, it's like you'll throw in words like lamist and anti town but wont commit to a vote without any support, since it'd attract too much attention to you. You even quote a post of mine just to throw shade with stuff like "if FL doesnt see this as opportunistic" etc. It's like you are waiting for that 1 or 2 townies to start the wagon from the little hints you give. That is a true scum agenda. After a townie or two forms a wagon, you then capitalize on it with all the content you have been soft pushing throughout the thread. You voted FL because ariane voted FL.
In post 209, snowbeast wrote:From real life experience when we question suspected poachers the innocent have one solid story and the guilty bounce around under pressure
Above question goes to you as well. I'm engaging not out of defense only, but as part of scumhunting too.
Irl we use non verbal communication like fidgeting and visible stress. Here we are all keyboard warriors and can't see each other face to face.
Reason I have not voted is maybe entering night might be good. People can investigate and hopefully get results. Also 5 votes for a lynch. I think we have 3 maf so of those 5 if it's a townie lynch we know 3 of them are maf. I'm not jumping on a band wagon and then have to explain myself unless the person makes a fatal error and warrants a lynch
There are two mafia. 7 town. And no I am not taking this as a town slip lol.
In post 218, Lamees wrote:Are you referring to post 210? I wanted to address 209 too so that's why I posted to him first. Unless you are forcing me into tunnelling you?
Umm, asking you questions and wanting you to engage is now scum forcing you to tunnel them?
Read the post order on the previous page and see what you said. You were acting as if I was ignoring your question in 210 just because I wanted to respond to 209(snowbeast)
In post 234, Lamees wrote:To answer 206, basically majority of your posts after FL's vote on you.
This must mean you disagree with my reasoning behind a majority of those posts, yeah? Could you pick out a couple of instances, just so I can see where you're coming from?
Exactly, my playstyle is active regardless of alignment. Therefore my engagement with FL, and my engagement with you is a result of me being active, which is NAI, and not flails in themselves. Agree?
I am mostly referring to content of the posts which I found scummy, not just the number of posts.
Post
Post #267 (isolation #37) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:30 pm
Postby Lamees »
In post 249, Auro wrote:I don't think Lamees' reactions under *pressure* are useful -- go check out D2 of Newbie 1893, the posts leading up to her lynch.
IMO it's a better strategy to let her post more, prod her and get her to change track, and then search for motivation/agenda overall.
I *think* town!Lamees generally votes out of OMGUS-y reasons more and scum!Lamees decides on an agenda and pushes based on that (from a very loose skim of meta).
I reread it. Looks like I just started the day with trying to find scum. I changed my vote a few times and all of a sudden it's "omg changed votes, flailing lets lynch". Ues that was the type of town pool I was in that day. Very disappoonting. I do understand it's a newbie game and I've seen worse reasons being pushed to lynch someone in a recent newbie game, but scum was pushing my lynch too. Scum can push any lynch with any made up reason. What made it easier for scum to lynch was a town player lock voted me since day 1. Yet I was the "anti town" one lol.
Post
Post #272 (isolation #39) » Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:00 pm
Postby Lamees »
Ariane - Town lean, I could be wrong as I haven't yet seen scum ariane.
lionheart1492 - Town lean, trying to find scum, or at least seems to be doing so. No reason to doubt this early.
snowbeast - Town lean, I said before I won't take the "3 mafia" post as a town slip. But the general posting and play seems townie to me.
Auro - Scum lean, seems to be in hard defense mode, most of his recent posts have been defensive and usually ends up with him trying to hi-light agreement to his cases or repeat questions and answers until some sort of stalemate wifom is achieved
volxen (SE) - Null, I can see his posting coming from either alignment.
YurikoJasmine (SE) - Null, not much to go on
Not_Mafia (SE) - obvious scum, but throwing the game seems to be acceptable this round so we can leave him alive.
Flavor Leaf (IC) - null, hard to read FL here, he seems different from the previous games I've played with him but not exactly clear scum different.
Post
Post #278 (isolation #41) » Wed Nov 21, 2018 12:21 am
Postby Lamees »
I agree with auro here, @snowbeast if you agree with me you should be voting auro here not NM, as NM has no momentum on the wagon. Votes being too spread and uncoordinated = no lynch.
Post
Post #294 (isolation #45) » Wed Nov 21, 2018 4:14 am
Postby Lamees »
I don't see it happening within the next 2 days. We would need around 5 townies on 1 wagon to lynch scum. And only 3 townies on 1 wagon to lynch a town.
If the auro wagon breaks down, 0 chance to lynch scum in 2 days, will be a no lynch or miss lynch.
Post
Post #295 (isolation #46) » Wed Nov 21, 2018 4:14 am
Postby Lamees »
I don't see it happening within the next 2 days. We would need around 5 townies on 1 wagon to lynch scum. And only 3 townies on 1 wagon to lynch a town.
If the auro wagon breaks down, 0 chance to lynch scum in 2 days, will be a no lynch or miss lynch.
Post
Post #297 (isolation #47) » Wed Nov 21, 2018 4:19 am
Postby Lamees »
In post 296, Auro wrote:@Not_Mafia, if not Yuriko, who else do you think is a good lynch today?
@Lamees: Not at all. I'm ready to vote with Not_Mafia and Ariane (both TRs for me at this point). I believe Volxen should change his read on me by now, and should join in. I don't think Flavor Leaf is going to continue voting for me either without a good case -- if he's casing, I'm ready to hear.
In post 316, lionheart1492 wrote:Auro saying that he is the only co firmed town to himself is what I was getting at with the “anyone but me”
Everyone is confirmed town to themselves. Are you not?
It’s a newbie game so I was trying to just lay out the situation/make sure we’re all on the same page.
Flavor leaf is correct that him coming in and unvoting auro is his towniest move in this position but it could also just be him seeing a d2 Lynch on him in the cards when auro flipped town. Leaning town on him and wouldn’t lynch today but don’t think he’s obvious town.
Why would I see a day 2 lynch on the cards? I know how to push mislynches and get out of them as scum. In that scenario, I could easily just turn on Lamees tomorrow as scum.
Turning it against me would be kinda hard when you had a wagon of players scum reading you day 1.
Last edited by MiniDeathStar on Wed Nov 21, 2018 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post
Post #327 (isolation #51) » Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:24 am
Postby Lamees »
In post 326, Auro wrote:Cue Newbie 1893, the last game Lamees and I were in, where Thor went off a wagon at L-1 because he didn't scumread that slot anymore. And flipped town at the end.
Lol this is as pointless as me saying you were scum that game therefore you're scum this game.
Post
Post #336 (isolation #54) » Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:43 am
Postby Lamees »
In post 334, lionheart1492 wrote:ok Lamees is town who has 1 read and has tunneled in on it at this point. Auro and FL are both bad lynches today. Where do you want to lynch instead? (Not necessarily awful if she’s at certain as she’s portraying)
I would love to lynch today so thanksgiving can be night phase. I’ll get my own priority out in a bit but it’s mt sisters birthday so Im mainly responding to stuff while with family rn.
I dont have 1 read, my strongest read is actually NM. But this town pool loses to scum NM 9/10 times imo. So might as well just go with it. The lynch on him isnt happening. So I went with the next lynch I found scummy, that's not happening either.
I will repeat what I said earlier, there's not enough time to lynch scum anymore. 5 townies in perfect co-ordination on a scum player in such short time isnt possible. But 3 towns and 2 scum pushing a lynch quickly is more realistic here. So we can expect a miss lynch or a no lynch.
In post 324, Lamees wrote:Unvoting auro there is the scummiest move in history tbh
UNVOTE:
This is the opposite of true
Why does scum Flavour Leaf risk destabilising that wagon?
If he is scum he knows auro's alignment. Therefore he knows he is at risk tomorrow. Look at the timing of the unvote. What was posted before his unvote? He is the second biggest wagon AND on the misslynch wagon? Easy lynch tomorrow. I mean if I was scum there I am for sure hopping off. But the way he hopped off was a bit TOO scummy to be scum. So I am gonna leave it as NAI.
Post
Post #350 (isolation #59) » Wed Nov 21, 2018 10:08 am
Postby Lamees »
Auro (L-3)
: volxen, snowbeast
Lamees (L-4)
: Not_Mafia
Flavor Leaf (L-4)
: Ariane
volxen (L-4)
: Flavor Leaf
Ariane (L-4)
: YurikoJasmine
lionheart1492, Auro, Lamees
My read list still stands btw. Auro flips town here? Really? As pointed out he was in "anyone but me" mode. Even admitted he wouldnt want FL to be lynched but this vote and wagon was there anyway. But I guess that panicky survival instincts isnt really alignment indicative, and new town would often do weird stuff to avoid a lynch.
Which reminds me, I once saw a new town fake power role claim, lol those were the days. FL do you remember? Lmao. The dojaj saga.
Anyways I'll wait to see this case on volx.
Last edited by MiniDeathStar on Wed Nov 21, 2018 7:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.