[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10568837 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1904 - Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #32 (isolation #4) » Thu Nov 29, 2018 4:01 am
Postby Lamees »
His entrance isn't alignment indicative to me. Can't see why town or scum would post that with intentions of progressing the game. Just RVS stuff I guess.
Post
Post #52 (isolation #5) » Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:31 am
Postby Lamees »
There are only two votes on the wagon now. That's a shame. Wanted to see what sort of pressure that wagon would generate. Looks like we just happened to RVS wagon the wrong player who happened to be the one inactive one lol.
Post
Post #85 (isolation #8) » Fri Nov 30, 2018 7:40 pm
Postby Lamees »
In post 84, AbyssalLord wrote:(I also recognize that there is no jest in this game.)
[sarcasm font] yeah, joking around is usually a quick auto lynch [saracasm font]
@muh, I am not sure. There are three ways to approach it:
1) take is as a legit townslip, which means he is town.
2) take it as a fake townslip, which means he is scum.
3) take it as NAI, and go off other play/posts to get a proper read on him.
Think I'll go with 3. Not really worth it to commit to his slip and confirm him as town or scum imo. Especially this early.
Post
Post #88 (isolation #10) » Fri Nov 30, 2018 7:49 pm
Postby Lamees »
I picked up irrel wants to get past RVS which I think is good for the game (either alignments) and I think a wagon is the perfect way to do so. We just happened to get a wagon on the wrong player the first attempt.
In post 104, Irrelephant11 wrote:I think wagoning is pro-town in general (though obviously it can lead to mislynches sometimes), because the pressure it provides helps to find scum
I think VOTE: Jim is overly afraid of wagons
I'm not afraid of wagons. I'm wary of one particular person blindly jumping on wagons and justifying their actions afterwards.
What about someone who jumps on a wagon but the reason they give for jumping on a wagon is that the player whose wagon they jumped on, was jumping on too much wagons?
Post
Post #135 (isolation #19) » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:58 am
Postby Lamees »
Not even sure about jim. My early play was to get a wagon, any one really, and get reactions from the player being wagoned. But I guess inactivity interfered with that strategy. So nothing useful came from it.
Post
Post #168 (isolation #23) » Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:42 pm
Postby Lamees »
You don't pocket someone by following their votes. Besides, If my latest vote was just sheeping irrel I would have said so. I'm not just sheeping, I gave a reason for my vote. Coincidence that irrel happened to be voting for that player too.
In post 88, Lamees wrote:I picked up irrel wants to get past RVS which I think is good for the game (either alignments) and I think a wagon is the perfect way to do so. We just happened to get a wagon on the wrong player the first attempt.
hmm... what could this lead to?
In post 90, Lamees wrote:Actually wait, auhsoj might be the wrong player too lol. He hasn't posted in over two days.
VOTE: jim
Alright, without the previous post, i could let this slide. But now i cant see your reasoning.
Why are you trying so desperately to get a wagon? Most of the people you voted didnt even write anything contributing to the convo. There are two reasons you seem to bring about with this wagon:
First is to get out of RVS, in which case voting anyone and seeing their reactions will do fine. No reason in changing from whoever you were voting before.
And in the second post, you say that joshua might be the wrong player. And what do you mean by wrong player? He hasnt responded yet, and you just seem to want to jump from wagon to wagon. Explain what you want to do, clearly, uncontradictary.
It's all here in the posts themselves. But I'll try to explain. I think we all agree that wagons in RVS is a nice way to progress the game. So that's why I joined irrel's wagon. Then as you can see, the first and second RVS wagon were both on inactive players, who got subbed out. And you even state here in the quote that the player has not reacted to the wagon, EXACTLY. Which is why I shifted away from the useless reactionless INACTIVE PLAYER wagon. Why am I having to explain this btw...
Post
Post #174 (isolation #25) » Wed Dec 05, 2018 3:56 am
Postby Lamees »
It's like everyone agrees that a RVS wagon on an inactive player who isnt going to give responses/info/reactions is useless. I AGREE WHICH IS WHY I CHANGED TO A DIFFERENT PLAYER. I even clearly saw and notified everyone that a wagon we have is on a player that hasnt posted in two days so I think we had the wagon on the wrong player and I changed vote.
Oh and remember at the development of these wagons, the players weren't inactive at the time.
Post
Post #242 (isolation #29) » Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:33 pm
Postby Lamees »
Yeah, ceejay's ISO is scum pushing lynch after lynch. Looks like he is willing to lynch whoever bar a few players. To be town and vote so freely on every wagon is concerning. Scum lean.
Post
Post #262 (isolation #31) » Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:53 am
Postby Lamees »
What made me scum read ceejay is that me and him had very very (I think possibly identical) voting patterns. But when he saw a wagon on me he all of a sudden scum reads me, extremely opportunistic, shows a mafia agenda.
Also, he outright power role fished and wanted L-1 on me in the same post (post 143). This type of post cannot possibly benefit town and no doubt harms town because 1) if I claim power role scum can plan better night actions and know what to be cautious for. 2) having someone at L-1 that early (especially since I was being town read by a few) is just asking for a miss lynch. If he is town why would he want a speed lynch of a town read player AND have power roles outed in early day 1 lol.
Post
Post #278 (isolation #32) » Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:09 am
Postby Lamees »
In post 269, Irrelephant11 wrote:CJ has been lynchbait before I think, or at least I know his play style sometimes gets him scumread
Having said that, I’m finding the cases against him somewhat convincing. Almost done rereading
Lamees you seem easier to read/understand here than in our last game. Is that intentional?
Which game? Was it the game where I as town got accused of scum slip? That game my thought pattern was that it was beneficial to lynch me. Town was so I think I was sorta right.
Post
Post #305 (isolation #34) » Sat Dec 08, 2018 9:07 pm
Postby Lamees »
The abyssal lynch is not good for town imo. I have a feeling he is actually VT as he claimed. The lynch will be rushed and I'm not even sure what we gain from it. High chance of the wagon being all town as everyone just wants a lynch.
Town AND scum would be likely to rush a miss lynch. I usually agree that a lynch is better than no lynch. But this case I'll go:
No lynch > abyssal lynch. A miss lynch on town for info is worthwihile, BUT I don't see what info we can gain from an abyssal miss lynch here.
Post
Post #316 (isolation #35) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 8:12 am
Postby Lamees »
Still feels rushed so not sure what info we'll get. But I guess town's only way to get mafia is by lynching so I'm down to gamble. Not sure if the odds are good but multiple players have a case on him.
Post
Post #323 (isolation #36) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:01 am
Postby Lamees »
If there are any power roles in the game claim now. Very low chances to land both of our lynches on the two power roles. I get the feeling someone is being dishonest here lol.
Post
Post #324 (isolation #37) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:03 am
Postby Lamees »
Ok I looked at the columns. We are probably in column C with a solo jail keeper. And scum is free to claim tracker. I am for lynching okx here. High chance of scum.
Post
Post #345 (isolation #42) » Tue Dec 11, 2018 12:11 pm
Postby Lamees »
VOTE: muh316
Dongempire and child had no reason to start a push on their scum partner. Irrel being tracker. Abyssal being track cleared.
That leaves jim hawkins and muh316 as the only two left. It could be either of them but I'm leaning muh316 after reading jim's iso, who was planning to lynch okx for majority of the game.
In post 348, Irrelephant11 wrote:I’m not ready to clear Child, there’s some weird moments regarding the slot in Okx’s ISO (remember Child replaced Jess)
Why not? He's the one that led the Okx lynch.
In post 345, Lamees wrote:That leaves jim hawkins and muh316 as the only two left. It could be either of them but I'm leaning muh316 after reading jim's iso, who was planning to lynch okx for majority of the game.
Where in Jim's ISO was he planning to lynch okx for the majority of the game? He was ready to lynch him 2 days before the deadline after he saw Child's analysis. Furthermore, he never actually voted Okx. He just stated he was going to 30 minutes before game ends. For all we know this could have been scumJim trying to pull off a no-lynch.
To cause wifom for scum. Also in case he actually decided to jk me and somehow survive then I'll be cleared too.
Yeah, you're right about jim regarding okx. I guess we have miss lynches so I'm ok with either one of you and jim (because of process of elimination).
Post
Post #374 (isolation #50) » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:43 am
Postby Lamees »
The longer we leave it the more wifom is gonna be generated. I already see players unvoting jim lol. Please do not screw this up. It's muh or jim. Read the way the lynch went down-If I had not voted there would for sure be no lynch.
I am leaning muh because scum agreed to claim tracker. With the hammer being that close to deadline, their only hope was that the actual tracker was offline/afk until deadline. I assume the mafia goon (okx's partner) told him that "if tracker cc's I HAVE TO HAMMER YOU". Muh fits this theory.
But jim not voting and claiming he will hammer (with it being that close to deadline this delayed hammer post is super unreliable and scummy, and I dont see why jim did this as town). If muh didnt hammer I assume jim would not hammer with the excuse of afk or something.
In post 374, Lamees wrote:
But jim not voting and claiming he will hammer (with it being that close to deadline this delayed hammer post is super unreliable and scummy, and I dont see why jim did this as town). If muh didnt hammer I assume jim would not hammer with the excuse of afk or something.
jim waiting could also be buying time, asking ohx to claim PR and hoping town loses confidence, that's true. both are good lynches imo, the only difference is my gut is telling me to vote muh, so i am going for him.
I am torn too. I am also leaning muh but I thought the rest were leaning jim. Anyway there's still some co-ordination to do, I'm fine with either one.
Post
Post #387 (isolation #53) » Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:33 am
Postby Lamees »
In post 384, Irrelephant11 wrote:I still think it’s VOTE: Jim
His recent read list doesn’t make sense - me and Abyssal should be at the top of anyone’s reads
dongempire is actually a slight possibility here
I now think Child is less likely to be scum than dong
I don't think scum would try to do this lol. He probably legit doesn't understand the setup, as town he didn't have reason to. Could still be scum playing dumb idk.
Post
Post #398 (isolation #54) » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:31 pm
Postby Lamees »
@jim, jailer had way more than a 50% chance of getting killed. They wouldn't target tracker in case the jailer decided to protect the tracker and block their kill.
Having a jailer alive is bad for scum because it can shut down a night kill.
Also you're correct, I did ask to be jailed for a case of possible misdirection, but for scum, not town.