[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11915315 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 2014: Aesthetic | Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Oh, that's weird. Porkens I have played with several times. Never seen him do a wall post like that. In any case, Arthur self hammering is bad which makes reading the NK pretty much WIFOM.
Votato's unvote was weird. He really had no reason to unvote there. There wasn't intent to hammer or anything. Given that my pred pointed out that we typically dance around the lynch for a while before deciding, I think makes the self hammer pretty anti-Town all things considered. Is moral for this game really that bad?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #389 (isolation #6) » Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:14 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
In post 387, votato wrote:yes, i was fairly convinced i was on town at that point. plus i was concerned that the day would end prematurely. turns out, i was right on both counts!
It's a completely moot point because you couldn't have known that at the time. I also expect you to "get" that it's not normal to end the day that early. Were you reading them as Town or what? Why did you unvote there besides just, "didn't want to end the day early"?
That's pretty much the worst example that you could have given. I was defending myself the whole time that game. And I was the D1 lynch. This argument is deeply flawed.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #417 (isolation #13) » Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:58 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
In post 416, votato wrote:quick the main thing thats consistent about you is that you're active, aggressive, and inconsistent. you flip flop all over the place. you werent on the defensive that game until you flip flopped a bunch. you also always talk about "your system" and how good you are at mafia. you havent mentioned your system for scumhunting. you have only pressed one read. youve been decently active, but the way youre active feels different too.
None of that is a good illustration of my play as Town as a whole. You've played like, 6 games with me and use only one to say why I am Scum. I haven't seen you use meta before and 6 games of meta isn't even enough. Your meta arguments are also incredibly weak given the point of reference is based on my first game back in 2 years. I also don't think you actually believe I am Scum.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #428 (isolation #14) » Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:31 pm
Postby LicketyQuickety »
I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.
Why have you implicitly cleared Anthony?
Totally forgot about them.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.
Why have you implicitly cleared Anthony?
so you think anthony is scum as well?
I think the post that people took issue with is newbie-town, but their vote on Arthur could be scum motivated. Unlike you, I am very interested in hearing what their replacement says.
But the reason for my question wasn't because I think Anthony scum, but because LQ is omitting them, which is odd, if not slightly scummy.
I haven't actually seen them post. It would be great to see what their replacement has to say. I more or less forgot that slot exists.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #455 (isolation #20) » Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:34 pm
Postby LicketyQuickety »
I feel like Anthony was either over cautious Scum or just Newb Town. Not much else in their ISO, but they did make a good point about Arthur being Town:
In post 85, Anthony87 wrote:I'm hesitant to L-2 Arthur for only one reason (and if someone wants to show me why this is meaningless, then I have no problem voting), does him trying to make sure the vote against him is counted seem anti scum?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.
excuse you? yes, me dropping off while on VLA is totally AI. i did defend why you're scum. i picked one game to link, but pretty much every game ive been with you was the same, except when you lurked in all your games and got replaced. but whenever youre active your playstyle is the same.
How do I know you were V/LA?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 455, LicketyQuickety wrote:I feel like Anthony was either over cautious Scum or just Newb Town. Not much else in their ISO, but they did make a good point about Arthur being Town:
In post 85, Anthony87 wrote:I'm hesitant to L-2 Arthur for only one reason (and if someone wants to show me why this is meaningless, then I have no problem voting), does him trying to make sure the vote against him is counted seem anti scum?
the best analysis quick can do, even after a flip is "town would be unlikely to say this non-gamesolving thing" quick is not town here.
Why is it a non-gamsolving thing?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #491 (isolation #26) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 12:15 pm
Postby LicketyQuickety »
In post 463, Town looter wrote:The bit that bothers me is the confidence that the game will be solved tomorrow. This is some kind of crowd-pleasing effort that is utter BS - it can't possibly be genuine because it's simply not true. Especially not true since in the same post they put a vote on someone who is generally being read as town or null.
I'm getting to the same place as votato, but for different reasons.
Yeah, I just have enough faith that with players as competent as Mikul and Lunatic that this game should theoretically be solved given another lynch due to associations. But you might have a point that sometimes even good players don't look at that stuff as closely as they should. Maybe I am over valuing those confirmed players ability, but it seems like they know what they are doing so *shrug*
I still stick by that there is probably one Scum in you/votato.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.
excuse you? yes, me dropping off while on VLA is totally AI. i did defend why you're scum. i picked one game to link, but pretty much every game ive been with you was the same, except when you lurked in all your games and got replaced. but whenever youre active your playstyle is the same.
How do I know you were V/LA?
well i might have posted in the thread about it. i definitely set my site status to VLA and PMd the mod. is this really the push you're gonna me tho? lol. activity is never AI for me.
Did you post itt about it? The mod made no note of you going V/LA
In post 455, LicketyQuickety wrote:I feel like Anthony was either over cautious Scum or just Newb Town. Not much else in their ISO, but they did make a good point about Arthur being Town:
In post 85, Anthony87 wrote:I'm hesitant to L-2 Arthur for only one reason (and if someone wants to show me why this is meaningless, then I have no problem voting), does him trying to make sure the vote against him is counted seem anti scum?
the best analysis quick can do, even after a flip is "town would be unlikely to say this non-gamesolving thing" quick is not town here.
Why is it a non-gamsolving thing?
being hesitant to put someone L-2 as a newbie isnt AI. talking about a vote counting isnt really very AI either. its an empty statement. there were statements with real content you could have talked about.
I gave a fair and balanced view of that post. You're throwing some serious shade with really weak arguments. You are definitely playing differently now then elsewhere I have played with you. You are way more aggressive for sure.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.
here is a three-person PoE that does not include anthony.
Yeah, which doesn't actually mean I was TRing Anthony. This was discussed. I forgot Anthony was even in the game.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #505 (isolation #30) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 5:31 pm
Postby LicketyQuickety »
Your points are also off this game. Like, usually you play in a way that you attack stuff by saying something that INFERS what you are saying rather than pointing things out directly and your points are usually right on the mark.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #535 (isolation #33) » Thu Jul 02, 2020 11:12 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
I feel like I don't really have a choice who we lynch at this point. I don't really have a read on Anthony at this point while Ydresse seems slightly Townie.
Should I just hammer at this point?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
I am a bit annoyed at myself that I got the Anthony/Ydrasse thing so wrong. 2 from 2 games where I have OMGUS'd followed by Confirmation Bias leading to shitty outcomes...
You don't say.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #579 (isolation #39) » Mon Jul 06, 2020 3:28 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
In post 577, Mikul wrote:If I lose us this game I apologize in advance. Without results and outing prs so early and the early innactivity and replacements has made this very hard to deal with and read properly. That being said I don't think tl is scum. The way that he reacted to what he thought was a scum slip seemed town and if he is scum then good game
I rbed quick and votato once.
Bro, if you were not confirmed Town, I would probably SR this post.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #580 (isolation #40) » Mon Jul 06, 2020 3:43 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
Nash hasn't really been on my radar and IDRK why. I think that slot has pretty much just lurked all game and just done nothing else. Mikul has an okay point on Tl, but I still think that just makes votato slot Scum. I haven't checked super closely, but given Nash has lurked so much, I can totally see Nash/votato as Scum team.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 428, LicketyQuickety wrote:I think it's pretty clear at least one of TL/votato is Scum. I think TL has made some posts that are hard(er) to fake as Scum, so that leaves me thinking votato is Scum. So Scum are in those three between TL/votato/nash. I really think the way votato dropped off means he's Scum since he doesn't actually have legit reasons for why I am Scum and can't defend that position.
here is a three-person PoE that does not include anthony.
In post 502, votato wrote:and you think im more aggressive in this game than youve seen before or less?
In post 522, votato wrote:ydrasse, it sucks for you, but you repped into a scummy slot and PoE was going this direction no matter what.
In post 529, votato wrote:i think i was the main person deflecting from looter, so saying that it was scum resisting that wagon isnt gonna get you very far, at least with me.
Then he got banned. I will go back and look again for anything that looks like a Non-Associative with votato and Nash.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #585 (isolation #42) » Mon Jul 06, 2020 4:01 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
I found like one thing that is even remotely close to being a Non-Associative between votato/Nash. I will not actually link the post because I don't want to give this metric away yet, but it doesn't completely fulfil my criteria for a Non-Associative so whatever. Still, I would say it's maybe better than nothing, but Nash has something really similar with my slot as well, so IDK.
I guess I will just trust you on Tl at this point since you aren't budging there anyways.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 585, LicketyQuickety wrote:I found like one thing that is even remotely close to being a Non-Associative between votato/Nash. I will not actually link the post because I don't want to give this metric away yet, but it doesn't completely fulfil my criteria for a Non-Associative so whatever. Still, I would say it's maybe better than nothing, but Nash has something really similar with my slot as well, so IDK.
I guess I will just trust you on Tl at this point since you aren't budging there anyways.
You don't have to trust me. I could be entirely wrong. I've often been wrong. I just picked his post as geninue excitement about what he thought was a scum slip and if I'm wrong then we've already lost. I won't be able to break away from that
So the second I townread him (in my mind )
Nash has to be scum
Well, It's not like Nash is going to self hammer (but he might), and I kinda want to hear from everyone before throwing a vote down there. Too much left in the air if we go into Elo and not everyone posted the previous Elo.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 8, votato wrote:to the newbies: welcome! I don't recognize any of you, so I'm assuming we have some first timers. A few tips: this is mafia, people are going to accuse you of being a liar and a cheat. It's gonna feel bad. The sooner you can get used to it the better for you. People are also going to attack you for what you say. As a member of the town, you should be sharing your thoughts anyway, and with time you will learn how to share your thoughts without getting attacked.
You should take some time to carefully read the above posts and familiarize yourself with some of the jargon and guides, especially if you have no mafia experience or no experience with forum mafia. The SEs are here to offer help, but do not take our word as law. I think even if we are scum none of us would tell lies that would confuse you or make you bad players, but there is a decent chance that at least one of us is scum and will lie to you about some things. That said, you shouldn't hesitate to ask questions of each other and if the SEs. The two other SEs are a lot more experienced than i.
To everyone, but especially the SEs: please view this post as nai. Again to the newbies: don't assume that just because I'm trying to be helpful that im a townie. Is make this post a scum too.
In post 49, ArthurConyl wrote:@Mikul Alright, I do agree this game is a little too quiet. Spam away I guess.
@looter Same question as votato, why would you lynch me?
Partly a reaction test, partly because your posts could be newbie-cum-scum - your posts have a feeling of anxiety in them, you seem to want to make sure you fit in and say the right thing. My question of Brassherald was semi-serious as I am still fairly inexperienced and wanted to see if your two posts were worth caring about.
Underlined the bits I think come across as anxious:
In post 31, ArthurConyl wrote:Tbh Mikul has about 60% of the posts so far, slow it down please. Can't keep up! VOTE: Mikul
I know this is a dodgy tactic but I promise to unvote
In post 53, ArthurConyl wrote:VOTE: Town looter You've stated you want to lynch me without reason, and also voted Mikul pretty early in the game over metareading.
Also you've stated you'll be lurking the whole game.
Loads of anti-town plays that scum would do.
FoS: Town looter
Waaaaiiiit. Missed underlined in first skim.
Any reason you are paraphrasing what is fairly obviously a joke so critically?
Did you learn anything from the reaction test? This is good reasoning otherwise. In particular the nervous unvote usually comes from scum and scum have a hard time picking up on jokes. VOTE: arthur
In post 131, Anthony87 wrote:Sorry I didn't vote when I posted my last message, this is my first forum game and I honestly wasn't sure if voting before discussion about our thoughts was normal (I saw someone else use FoS without voting before so I wasn't sure). I was ready then and I'm ready now to L-1 Arthur for the reasons I posted before. Isn't it normal for people to claim when they get down to L-2/L-1? He just threw a tantrum.
VOTE: ArthurConyl L-1
don't care for this all that much. Still better than brass' vote
In post 173, votato wrote:yeah both anthony and brass really didnt do any scumhunting yesterday. brass was active lurking and LAMISTing pretty hard.
In post 185, Lunatic wrote:2 scum are within Anthony, vex, townlooter and brassherald.
and id remove townlooter from that PoE i think. i think.
In post 268, votato wrote:i still think looter is likely town. Im fine voting either brass or Anthony. I feel that claiming was a bit silly, you were both already town. Oh well. Dunno why everyone is ignoring vexossa. Definite room for a lurky scum there
In post 293, votato wrote:ok i gues ill defer to mikul and lunatic since they were both in that game with you and know you better. but i still think brass is the best lynch today.
Outside of RVS, votato never placed his vote on brass, inspite of having him under his radar for almost the entire Day. I can see a lot of subtle shading, but none actually look genuine.
You vote votato for his unvote and then throw more shade at him for pushing Anthony, which you say could have come from town!votato. The read based off of one unvote does not feel sincere at that stage, after which you proceed to fencesit. Votato's 380 was not good, because the continued refusal was what made brass look town to me. Neither of your meta reads are good. 461 and 462 just don't make sense.
It makes perfect sense to have some scum theatrics there since neither of you really had any traction to be eliminated.
Except I have never had votato as Town. And I kept saying votato's arguments were weak because they were. I also completely demolished his reasons for SRing me so much that he couldn't rightly vote me anymore. I think he knew he was in a tunnel on Town and gave up the ghost because it wasn't gaining any traction cuz he knew what he was saying was off.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 486, LicketyQuickety wrote:Also, I must not have read closely enough because I never saw the cop claim.
what was the purpose of this post?
IDK. I didn't see that there was a Cop claim. That seemed like an important detail I missed, but I honestly can't remember why it mattered.
It’s a really weird post for you to make in the context of both PRs already having been revealed, something you did acknowledge prior to this post.
I understand what lunatic/mikul/votato we’re going for with the reaction test of pushing Ydrasse for a claim, but the cat was already out of the bag by the time you posted. So I’m left with the explanation that you just forgot what the game state was? You’re fairly invested into the game by this point so I have a hard time buying that.
Because claiming cop would have been something I would have pressured.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #635 (isolation #52) » Tue Jul 07, 2020 6:35 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
In post 634, Micc wrote:I kinda want to take the whole exchange as genuine town confusion from you. I think as mafia you’d have a more solid understanding of the game state, and even in a point of confusion, you’d have expressed in the mafia PT instead of the thread.
I’m not ready to bet the game on this read, but it’s where I’m at right now.
I mean, it's basically we lose the game if Nash is Town and we know JK is getting killed unless Nash is RB. Not really sure what else to say here.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Post
Post #638 (isolation #54) » Tue Jul 07, 2020 7:04 am
Postby LicketyQuickety »
In post 637, Micc wrote:You bring up a good point. Presuming Nash is mafia, TL shouldn’t hammer until Mikul claims a jailkeep target for the night. If Nash flips RB then Mikul’s jailkeep target is confirmed town even if Mikul dies. If Nash flips goon then the jailkeep target is irrelevant.
On the flip side, we’re headed to the stage where Nash is confirmed to be mafia. Another path to consider is that we agree who Nash’s partner is today while we have Mikul’s input and commit to that elimination for tomorrow. That’s the road I’m going down by questioning you. Do you want to talk about a Micc/LQ/TL final three now or not?
Predit: this post explains that I hope. TLDR: not giving mikul a chance to claim a target or weigh in on final three is basically slapping confirmed town in the face and I’m not gunna do that
Nash has one vote afaik. I'm just pointing out that it doesn't really make any sense for you not to vote there.
Given the above, I am not really sure who I would vote at this point if it was Tl and you. I'm not going to just arbitrarily pick one either. I'll try and ISO nash + your pred + Tl to inform me on that, but I already kinda found that it's totally possible that Nash is teamed with you with one post offering a slight hesitation. I haven't checked for Tl I don't think, but will do that now.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Because I don't believe that you are not hammering just to wait for Mikul. And I ISO'd Nash/Tl and saw some stuff I thought makes it really difficult for Nash to be teamed with Nash. That said, I can see some room for it in some of Tl's other pushes, but overall I saw Tl push votato's pred in a very real way. It doesn't constitute as a Non-Associative, but it's pretty indicative they are not teamed.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.