[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13637130 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 2111 - Know Your Skittles! (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #73 (isolation #6) » Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:18 pm
Postby Weuler »
In post 72, usesPython wrote:
Also VT read on Human Sequencer, it'd be odd to ignore a game if there's something interesting happening and since there's no indication of them going V/LA
(And thus clearly everyone that has posted so far must have an interesting role, QED you're all scum)
In post 72, usesPython wrote:
Also VT read on Human Sequencer, it'd be odd to ignore a game if there's something interesting happening and since there's no indication of them going V/LA
(And thus clearly everyone that has posted so far must have an interesting role, QED you're all scum)
Observation 1: Human Sequencer has posted in the past at specific times of day
Observation 2: Human Sequencer has not posted in this thread even at those specific times of day
Hypothesis 1: Something is preventing them from posting in this thread
Hypothesis 1a: RL is preventing them from seeing this thread -> Not posting is NAI
Hypothesis 1b: They have seen this thread and are choosing not to post -> Not posting is AI
Observation 3: This is not Human Sequencers first game (they're here as SE) -> They should know lurking is scummy behavior
Hypothesis 2: If they know lurking is scummy and they are scum, they would post so as to not seem scummy
Conclusion 1: If they are choosing not to post and they know lurking is scummy, it's because they are not interested -> They got a boring role (i.e. not scum and not PR)
Your conclusion only follows from 1b not 1a. The argument seems weak to me and I don't see how it warrants starting to discuss PRs
In post 88, Elements wrote:
VOTE: human
Clear scumslip knowing there are two town prs
I can't tell if you're joking but you might be onto something. I didn't actually look at the Newbie Setup until now but Options A and B have three chances at 2 town PRs. Option C only has one.
I think role hunting in any form is harmful right now. I don't even know if talking about the Newbie Setup is a good idea
So you talk about the newbie setup and then say talking about it isn't a good idea?
Post
Post #123 (isolation #13) » Tue Feb 07, 2023 7:02 am
Postby Weuler »
In post 121, Elements wrote:
I think human is town, what do you recon Weuler? UNVOTE:
I would have liked it more if their explanation was that they thought all 9 scenarios had 2 PRs in them. Then their wording would have made more sense.
In post 120, Human wrote:
Well I'm going to be honest yes, I just thought it was unnecessary wording
I guess the statement still makes sense if you write "at most". Still I don't really see why you wouldn't just write that
I'm hella lazy as town
To me "there are 2" and "there are at most 2" are not at all the same thing. Human's other posts feels towny, but this just irks me. Possibly this is Human being "lazy town" as you say though.
Now obviously the first post is a joke, but I'm not sure it's a joke someone who prefers voting for people who've made a post would make. Might be hesitant to vote for Taly specifically?
In post 72, usesPython wrote:
Also VT read on Human Sequencer, it'd be odd to ignore a game if there's something interesting happening and since there's no indication of them going V/LA
(And thus clearly everyone that has posted so far must have an interesting role, QED you're all scum)
In post 89, Human wrote:
My point was there were at most two PR's
A question to clarify: Did you know that not all possibilities contains 2 PR when you wrote the original post?
UNVOTE: Elements VOTE: Weuler
I'll try to answer this:
First the RVS vote: In this game my first RVS vote was on Elements for joke reasons. In my last games it was on CCG for joke reasons (I was the first who posted. What else would I post?) All subsequent votes in my last game was not due to joking around. My reason for not voting Taly is that they haven't made a single post for two days so I don't see how voting them is beneficial. They will probably just get force replaced soon.
Calling 119 PR hunting is just not true. I wanted to ask Human for clarification. Several people had already pointed out that not every scenario has 2 PRs.
Post
Post #214 (isolation #22) » Tue Feb 07, 2023 7:36 pm
Postby Weuler »
In post 203, Aureal wrote:
Further, if we take the idea that this truly was a scumslip, we have to consider how Human would even realize the setup, for a true newbie isn't so likely to have considered the ramifications of the setup chart.
That's precisely why I asked them to clarify in 119.
The interaction with Weuler about the wording is more interesting, though. After being imprecise with Black's post as I noted earlier, Weuler complains in 122 and 123 and then some more in 133 about Human's wording, almost like he's thinking Human really is going to go down for this and really doesn't want to be associated with it if actually scum partners. Asks me if I think it was a slip, and when I ask whether he thinks I was being serious he actually uses an exclamation point(!) to say he's not sure if I am when normally he hardly even uses punctuation- the only exclamation points used thus far are saying hello in his intro post.
This is just grasping at straws. As I remember it, nobody was really going after Human for their possible slip. The purpose of my questions was to get an idea of whether it was a slip or not. The exclamation point remark is just silly. I sometimes use an exclamation mark when I think it is appropriate, for greetings (as you point out), for conveying surprise (when I answered your question regarding your reads), and sometimes to convey to someone that I am taunting them.
Post
Post #217 (isolation #24) » Tue Feb 07, 2023 8:20 pm
Postby Weuler »
My vote on Python obviously doesn't belong there. I think UNVOTE: Python[/unvote ], VOTE: Aureal is not too bad of a choice. She begins the day relatively quietly, but then suddenly comes with these posts trying to force the scum pair Human/Me. I just don't see some of the points as being genuine analysis.
First the RVS vote: In this game my first RVS vote was on Elements for joke reasons. In my last games it was on CCG for joke reasons (I was the first who posted. What else would I post?) All subsequent votes in my last game was not due to joking around. My reason for not voting Taly is that they haven't made a single post for two days so I don't see how voting them is beneficial. They will probably just get force replaced soon.
Calling 119 PR hunting is just not true. I wanted to ask Human for clarification. Several people had already pointed out that not every scenario has 2 PRs.
The RVS was obviously a joke, my specific point was that I don't think someone who prefers voting for people who post would make that specific joke. Given that we know you were town in 2109 and that it was very clearly a joke being the first post in that game, the logical conclusion from that read would be that "you preferring to vote for people who post" is the part that's incorrect.
Ok I guess Human isn't the only one who does not write in a precise manner. The way I have usually played is that my first vote is usually a joke vote for some random reason, but then the subsequent votes have something to do with the game. For a serious vote I don't think voting for someone who has not posted is useful
In post 203, Aureal wrote:
Further, if we take the idea that this truly was a scumslip, we have to consider how Human would even realize the setup, for a true newbie isn't so likely to have considered the ramifications of the setup chart.
That's precisely why I asked them to clarify in 119.
I don't follow the progression here, if you don't believe a newbie would consider the ramifications of the setup chart why would you see Human as being newtown?
Ok I think I misread Aureal's "ramifications of the setup chart" when I answered this post. I was focused on if they had noticed that there were two scenarios with VT or not, hence my answer. I see now that she is talking about the vertical reasoning.
Regarding Aureal's actual post: I definitely think that a newbie could come up with the vertical reasoning by themself. In fact I remember myself coming up with it before the first newbie game I played, when reading through the setup.
Post
Post #291 (isolation #30) » Wed Feb 08, 2023 7:39 pm
Postby Weuler »
To give some other remarks:
1. I had actually forgotten that the setup could include only 1 PR. All my previous games has included 2 PRs. This was why I made post [p]119[/p] because I thought that human had maybe made the same mistake.
2. Element's initial mention that Human had made a scum slip made me tunnel vision that the "slip" could only come from scum. This was also probably in part because I had not yet realised that this could be a slip at all, see point 1.
I like weuler and arko for scum at this point. Weuler made jokes all throught the first few pages of the newbie game that was brought up. It's weird theyre not funny here it was something I noticed
Arko just has that big scum energy
Page 7 solve
If we are starting to analyse jokes, then please don't miss my 220 from yesterday
Post
Post #295 (isolation #33) » Wed Feb 08, 2023 7:56 pm
Postby Weuler »
My time is running out before I need to work so I will just leave with this remark. Unless other people also missed the PR possibility then why are they still suspicous of human?
Post
Post #346 (isolation #37) » Thu Feb 09, 2023 9:33 am
Postby Weuler »
In post 341, Black wrote:
I want to UNVOTE: for now because I think after Elements vote on herself she's at e-2. Discussion is picking up and I don't think the Day should end yet
Do you think elements might get quickhammered? The ele wagon just started
In post 358, Weuler wrote:
Python's iso is wild. Not necessarily in a scummy or towny way though, but it's probably something worth analysing.
So you're getting a null read on his iso but it's wild? Can you elaborate?
I didn't say it was a null read. I feel like the posts indicate something, but I'm not sure what (or is this what a null read is?). The point is that looking through Python's iso, I see someome playing very mechanically, using a lot of logic and reviewing meta. Now, at a first glance this could be e.g. 1. Playstyle 2. Scum trying to not engage with the game in a more relaxed maanner. 3. Newtown?
I tried to use some logic myself in my last game, but the thing with Python was that almost every single post felt mechanically logical.
In post 213, Aureal wrote:
(the roles are probably listed by the mod in the PT even without sharing with each other, from what I can see of previous mafia PTs from newbie games)
In post 222, usesPython wrote:
Is there a specific reason you double checked the format of a mafia PT from previous games? The exact mechanics of how mafia know their partner and roles don't seem to be that important given that the end result is the same and you don't strike me as the type of person to be this diligent about this type of stuff.
Because your comment made me curious as it hadn't even occurred to me that scum possibly wouldn't know their partner's role without sharing. Oddly, some of the non newbie threads did not give any info about roles at the start and they didn't share with each other either, though they could've gotten the info in their role PM. And it wouldn't have the same ramifications on the game as a newbie game with the set chart used here. (Ironically I did recently read an old game of mine where we apparently didn't bother to tell our teammates our cool roles, though we only got to talk at night in PMs back then)
And I totally am the kind of person who's diligent about this stuff.
Elements and Weuler, you two played with Aureal in Newbie 2108. Do you think this is a scumslip?
She knew that mafia PT lists the names and roles of all mafia members despite every game she's finished having her as VT (Namely Newbie 2108 and Micro 1068)
Ok that's not really a
slip
. Anyway, Aureal from 2108 did look up things from other games. For example she looked up Charles's play history.
Can you elaborate on this? Do you consider knowing the structure of a mafia PT having never been scum to not be a slip by itself or is it that you don't consider it to be a slip coming from Aureal because you have experience with her checking past games?
She explained why she knew the structure in the post. So it isn't a slip.
Post
Post #394 (isolation #45) » Fri Feb 10, 2023 7:04 am
Postby Weuler »
Reading through Aureal's iso I don't really get a scum vibe. My earlier complaints about an argument being pulled from thin air can make sense from TownAureal being very focused on the scum pair Human/Weuler and seeing scum signs when there aren't any. I think a scumAureal could have pushed harder during the Weuler wagon. If her goal was just to lim a townie, then she could at least have voted me when the wagon started picking up.
Post
Post #396 (isolation #47) » Fri Feb 10, 2023 7:06 am
Postby Weuler »
There are other people I want to take a look at. In particular, Python and some of the inactive people, but that will probably need to wait until tomorrow.
Post
Post #407 (isolation #48) » Fri Feb 10, 2023 10:21 am
Postby Weuler »
Theorem: 1+1=2
Proof: Let s denote the successor function. By definition 1 =s(0). Now, by definition of addition, 1+1=1+s(0)=s(1+0). Again, by definition of addition, 1+0=1, whence s(1+0)=s(1), which is equal to 2 by definition. QED
Post
Post #469 (isolation #49) » Sat Feb 11, 2023 12:51 am
Postby Weuler »
In previous games, I have had some success in scumhunting by finding the player with the most "neutral-looking" iso. At least some people seem to turn into neutral observers whenever they get a scum role, where they spend most of the game asking other people questions or commenting on things happening without analysing it.
Post
Post #470 (isolation #50) » Sat Feb 11, 2023 12:52 am
Postby Weuler »
Now, Python's posts does give of a bit of a neutralish, logical, air. Still there is analysis being done, even though I doubt the validity of some of it
Post
Post #487 (isolation #51) » Sun Feb 12, 2023 12:35 am
Postby Weuler »
I think you make a good point, black really gives me sheeping vibes. I'm also not a big fan of some of their posts, in particular 127 just seems forced and lamist.
Post
Post #490 (isolation #54) » Sun Feb 12, 2023 12:47 am
Postby Weuler »
Some thoughts about the inactives (or previously inactives)
Arko: Aside from a few brief reads he hasn't really contributed at all. In 2108 a scum did something similar, promising reads "soon" every time they posted. I really don't like this.
Freedom/HS: HS townread Human and Black, cast suspicion on Aureal, Elements, and me then disappeared. Not sure how to interpret that. I expected a bit more from HS's successor, and I hope they provide some more of their thoughts soon.
In post 490, Weuler wrote:
Some thoughts about the inactives (or previously inactives)
Arko: Aside from a few brief reads he hasn't really contributed at all. In 2108 a scum did something similar, promising reads "soon" every time they posted. I really don't like this.
Freedom/HS: HS townread Human and Black, cast suspicion on Aureal, Elements, and me then disappeared. Not sure how to interpret that. I expected a bit more from HS's successor, and I hope they provide some more of their thoughts soon.
But I'm the candidate you chose to pressure? Seems convenient to do so right after someone else expresses suspicion. I mean you jumped on that
Arko is getting prodded so no point in pressuring there, but if he does another prod dodge I may consider it. Freedom replaced in relatively recently. Is the pressure getting to you?
In post 487, Weuler wrote:
I think you make a good point, black really gives me sheeping vibes. I'm also not a big fan of some of their posts, in particular 127 just seems forced and lamist.
I think some pressure is in order VOTE: black
Accusing me of sheeping while actively sheeping. Can you elaborate?
I'm sheeping? I wasn't even sure that Python wanted to actually vote you when I voted for you. His post reminded me of my earlier suspicions of you, see my earlier posts, and I think you've been flying under the radar for a while.