But Parama beat me to it
Any way
And I am an SE I am one game away from IC
Well then don't hint at it, plus sarcasm is not easily detected over text.Johannes583 wrote:If you think I was honestly claiming to be scum, your sarcasm detector needs batteries.
Making a claim to be mafia, whether you are or not, is a very dumb move, no matter which stage of the game it is.
First of all, why can't I be friends with a famous artistmoose200x wrote:First, I know that's a lie SicShotster. I've seen that avatar at other forums, are you suggestion other people have "stole" your avatar?
And are you insinuating I cannot understand what dr my shotty iz sik stands for?
He is very right about this, it seems like active lurking is one of the only ways you know to call, and get others to think someone is scum. Don't oush so hard, especially when you aren't right about what you are pushing, that sir is scummy.Parama wrote:unvote, vote: jimfinn
Moose is not active lurking. Get that through your brain.
About the first paragraph of the post. No it's not, we are slowly coming out of an RVS and getting to know the people you are playing with better builds a better game.Jim wrote:So discussing things like personal life and whether certain other players may or may not be attractive based primarily on their nationality is not a form of active lurking? That's news to me. Either way, I'll unvote since Moose has finally posted content.
And as Moose so kindly drew to my attention, yes Dr.'s #28 does feel a bit like coaching or at least trying to appear "too town", so I'll VOTE: DocShot
I only said that because in a game I am in(I'll send you a link when it ends) I did that and I was town, but it ended VERY!!!!! badly.jimfinn wrote:@Doc: Regarding my comments about you being too town, that is because you seemed to being trying too hard to appear town (e.g. saying things like "you don't want to jokingly claim scum")
Thats far, and yes he did deffend him. I motion that the scum team may be Jim and Mist, do I have a second?moose200x wrote:All women are pretty
I agree with the nooby card he has experience so throw that card out the window. Wait, did mist say he was a noob and defended him? HMmmmmm
I think your #59 post was correct with a tad of OMGUS throw in.
I have played F2F, and yes body lanuage is a big tell, but if you think of words as body language you will be just fine, I still think you are, or may be the partnerBlack Mist wrote:Doc, actually it doesn't. This type of game style is very different. When you play f2f it's less about the words and more about the body language. That can be a scumtell in itself. And this is a NEWBIE game, so I doubt the experience with this type of game warnts towards much. Oh yes, I'm defending him. I'm stating my reasons for not voting on him. I'm still waiting for a few others to reply before I place vote. Please read my first and second post and I belive you'll see it.
You see when I type, I do it stream of conchisnes, like faulkner(great author). I also suck at spelling, I post alot, and I say what I think as I think it, just like my body languageBlack Mist wrote:Actually body language and words are very different. Body language is unvoluntary and is worse. Words are typically more well thought out, especailly when they are posted on a forum. I've been apart of forums for awhile to know that you should read a post before you post it in order to make sure it's exactly what you want to say.
I also would like to point out that Moose already made the point of me being a possible partner to Jim. There's your second. But I also recall Moose asking me what I thought of your post. Could this be a partnership? I think so. One attacks, than puts partner on the pestal and than partner attacks that person? Maybe.
Moose. What's an IC, going to see that you can't see for yourself? Also there's alot of back and forth between you and Doc against me. You're wagoning with him, with what reason? Not placing a vote on someone that hasn't posted much and claims newbie?
I had no reason, that is why I unvoted. I fell for Moose's buddyness(you see I have no real friends). Then I also gave reason for my vote on Mosse. And answer me this. If you are scum and you buddy with someone, but they figure you out, what would you do other than then saying they are scum and trying to pass the buck?Doubtful wrote:DMSIS, the question is: Why did your vote Black Mist to put her at L-2 on your 24th post and say "we can deal with jim tomorrow"
You had no reason, it seemed like an opportunistic vote to lynch Black Mist.
More and more likely seems the scumpair of DMSIS and moose200x, with DMSIS telling moose not to buddy so much and then voting moose, followed by a complete change of opinion in moose from thinking that DMSIS was town to scum.
No Moose buddied with me. I am saying Moose is scumDoubtful wrote:First of all, voting for no reason is suspicious.
"If you are scum and you buddy with someone, but they figure you out, what would you do other than then saying they are scum and trying to pass the buck?"
So are you saying that you are scum? It does seem like you are talking about yourself here... buddying with Moose...
Trust me he buddied me, plus he even said he wanted to be my friend.Doubtful wrote:EBWOP: Oops, hit the wrong button...
Next, about the vote on Moose, you gave no reason either... until I made a point, which you agreed to.
Preview:
The problem is, you buddied with Moose just as much as he did with you. And you bussed Moose just as much as he did you as well.
But he stopped the buddying? Think about it. I could have played along with Moose and mislynched mist. I think that is what scum would do instead of bussing a partner, and stopping a mislynchDoubtful wrote:I know he buddied you. Hence why I suspect him.
But you buddied him as well, that's the point.
Upgrade HoS to BoS: DMSIS, moose.
I guess that makes some sense, but on the other hand if you think about it this way I do make sense too. If Moose is scum and I'm not then all that had to happen was one more person to vote and a scum hammer. Also another reason I don't hate you for suspecting me is that one scum is almost deffinitly on that wagon, because if they weren't then the two rel scum would have hammered. But why is no one looking into Cliquey?Doubtful wrote:But he stopped the buddying? Think about it. I could have played along with Moose and mislynched mist. I think that is what scum would do instead of bussing a partner, and stopping a mislynch
^^^
WIFOM
You can't defend yourself with "what scum would do", you can only defend yourself with "what you did do".
Also, mist was never at L-1. The only votes casted on Mist were from you and moose... other than Cliquey's proxy vote.
You realized that there wasn't a viable lynch on mist, thus moose started buddying with you. At the same time, jimfinn posted analysis of you buddying moose, so you now vote him.
Scum had no wagon to push at any time... concerning anyone other than moose or DMSIS. So you can't really make that statement, even if it were true. It plain doesn't apply to context.
Do you find her active lurky at all?Doubtful wrote:EBWOP: As for Cliquey, not much can be said about her vs. this whole thing. She hasn't been making many attacking points, just pointing out flaws in points made by others (which is, yes, a very important thing as well). She seems content with the idea of voting DMSIS, and has found DMSIS suspicious. There's not many signs of bussing or buddying... I will ISO Cliquey's posts eventually, though, and you should as well.
SIR THAT IS SCUMMY!! Why wouldn't you put a vote on me instead of quick hammering as soon as I'm L-1. Wait to hammer is a scum tell.moose200x wrote:jimfinn wrote:I've just read the two pages of overnight exchange between doubtful and DMSIS with a few others' posts thrown in; I've said before and will say again that the previous buddying interactions between moose and DMSIS make me convinced that one or both of them are scum. DMSIS seems to be making an attempt right now to distance himself from the buddying, and moose's willingness to hammer after DMSIS posted (noted earlier) makes me wonder if he is scum trying to have an excuse to force a mislynch through. Therefore, I will currently UNVOTE: DMSIS VOTE: moose. Even though I think both are very suspicious, moose needs to do a lot more explaining right now than DMSIS does.
Ok, i am not going to flip out but your logic is so fucking fail. Look at it.
You think me or dmsis are both or at least once scum.
You think i'm scum cuz i'm going to hammer dmsis and force a mislynch.
How does that make sense? you were voting for him too! AND I FUCKING waited to hammer. You jumped on his bandwagon just like your jumping on mine. God, that is so scummy. But i dont even think your scum. which scares the crap outta me. you've done nothing as town in this game but you will slide under the radar, doing nothing special yet somehow be alive at the end of the game.
Ok so if you think we are both scum, then why me?Doubtful wrote:OK. Three people are voting DMSIS, jimfinn and I both think DMSIS is scum with moose, and smargaret posted
So that's 6 people thinking DMSIS is scummy or slightly scummy. Majority.I don’t think he’s scummy enough to lynch today, given Moose and Cliquey.
UNVOTE, VOTE:DMSIS