[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 9177953 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Newbie 1795 | Summer | Endgame - Mafiascum.net
For Newbie Games, which have a set format and experienced moderators. Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
108 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tchill13
Tchill13
Survivor
Tchill13
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11552
Joined: March 17, 2017
Post
Post #85 (isolation #0) » Mon May 08, 2017 11:09 am
Postby Tchill13 »
In post 84, jjh927 wrote:There are two players who got replaced in and have yet to post, which we can't really fault them for. The guy I'm voting posted once, and didn't really contribute anything with that post.
Hey guys just skimmed through the game. Seems to be picking up a little. Cero what do you mean by resistance?
Post
Post #87 (isolation #1) » Mon May 08, 2017 12:11 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
OK I was just wondering you referenced it multiple times I think. So since Cinderella is getting replaced and you voted her to "get the ball rolling" why not vote yournotmydad instead?
Post
Post #92 (isolation #3) » Mon May 08, 2017 3:12 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
In post 18, Fykus wrote:I'm tempted to L-1 you but I suppose I shouldn't, just in case scum decide to pull a fast one.
VOTE: Jax Teller
Because I hated jax by the end of that show.
Just reread what's happened so far. This seems to be the only significant thing that's happened so far unless I just missed something. Not sure why the topic died so quickly I guess that the fact this is rvs is why. If fykus puts him at L-1 he just Unvotes himself more than likely. It does seem like an attempt at towncred. If you're afraid to vote him there's no need to mention the fact you kind of want to.
Post
Post #94 (isolation #4) » Mon May 08, 2017 3:37 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
That's completely understandable. I also agree. Too many people who haven't posted yet and the fact that yourenotmydad has only posted once. I'm not sure you'll get anywhere with that either he may get replaced. Too early for strong reads. I just didn't see the need to comment on anything else as nothing seemed too important to me.
Post
Post #96 (isolation #5) » Mon May 08, 2017 3:49 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
In post 55, Papa Zito wrote:I'm curious why you feel the need to defend Cero68, jjh927.
Good lord the numbers.
I never think it's a good thing to mention you'd like to vote but don't for so and so reason. You're making a point to mention it which is odd to me because you obviously don't want to or else you would... This post seems a little odd. I agreed with your response.
Post
Post #98 (isolation #6) » Mon May 08, 2017 4:00 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
No I don't have a problem with voting for no reason because as you said it's usually a pressure vote. What I have a problem with is mentioning you'd "like" to vote them but then not doing so... Why even mention it? To get town cred. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough.
In post 83, Cero68 wrote:I wanted to get a feel for the other not so active players. Mind you it is just the second day that this game started, but more information is better.
How are you going to "get a feel" for a player who hasn't posted yet?
In post 97, jjh927 wrote:The problem is that he hasn't followed up on the pressure at all
r u sure
How would have cero followed up on his pressure? It really seems like he hasn't. Why are you pushing cero here? Cero seems to have voted that guy simply to get him to post.
Post
Post #116 (isolation #10) » Tue May 09, 2017 5:35 am
Postby Tchill13 »
OK thanks. When I asked how cero would follow up on his pressure that was a response to Zito. Zito asked are you sure? And I stated it really seems like cero hasn't followed up on his pressure.
Post
Post #122 (isolation #13) » Tue May 09, 2017 1:56 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
In post 103, jjh927 wrote:I mean, this is a newbie game, but you've dived straight after the lowest hanging fruit active in the game and poked them a little. The advantage of pressuring LHF in the RVS is that they're likely to respond in some way shape or form that you can then push and get responses out of and that gets the game running, but I don't think you've made a significant effort to do that.
Regardless of whether Zito thinks this is an argument against his play style or not I feel like this is a good point.
Post
Post #127 (isolation #14) » Tue May 09, 2017 4:01 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
Cece I think the only reason Zito voted cero is because that's an easy person to throw a vote on at the moment. I don't think he has too much reason to. Which it's still early in day 1 it's pretty easy to throw a vote on anyone without having much reason still.
Post
Post #136 (isolation #16) » Wed May 10, 2017 6:15 am
Postby Tchill13 »
Yeah I'm not sure how I feel about cero's last post. Not mafia what do you think about fykus's claim against jj? Zito seems to only be focusing on cero at the moment.
Post
Post #158 (isolation #20) » Thu May 11, 2017 5:16 am
Postby Tchill13 »
Hi New players. Not sure about the town lean on fykus from Arnold. Even though he made that case against jj he's still a scum lean for me because of his l-1 comment.
Post
Post #169 (isolation #23) » Thu May 11, 2017 7:23 am
Postby Tchill13 »
In post 18, Fykus wrote:I'm tempted to L-1 you but I suppose I shouldn't, just in case scum decide to pull a fast one.
VOTE: Jax Teller
Because I hated jax by the end of that show.
The way Fykus mentions he'd like to put him at L-1 here then doesn't. Easy attempt for town cred but jj would have more than likely Unvoted himself. Fykus then blows this off a few posts later. Zito and jj get into a discussion and Fykus states jj won... Seems "convenient" to me that jj lost his discussion with Zito after jj was the one who brought up Fykus' L-1 comment. I personally don't think either side "won" that discussion. Then Fykus' post on 132 seems to be grasping at straws a little. It's also very well put together and planned out which makes me see Fykus' argument as "I'm scum defending myself trying to throw the attention on jj"
Post
Post #193 (isolation #25) » Fri May 12, 2017 8:03 am
Postby Tchill13 »
I'm not sure how you can call it hopping on wagons for town cred at this point when nobody has had 3 votes on them. There's been hardly any pressure applied to anyone this game so far. Fykus play after his comment seems scummy to me. Not_mafias play seems just as scummy right now. If I'm not mistaken they're both voting jj right now... Very odd feeling to me.
Post
Post #194 (isolation #26) » Fri May 12, 2017 8:15 am
Postby Tchill13 »
I also think town should have pushed fykus more. Honestly at this point though not_mafias lack of cooperation and scum hunting is pretty alarming. He's keeping up with the game and has absolutely no reads.
Post
Post #202 (isolation #28) » Fri May 12, 2017 1:04 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
See I was feeling like when fykus said he had a gut feeling it'd be me. Maybe it's not. I was just going off the fact that you pointed out his L-1 comment. Then he made a case against you. I pointed out his L-1 comment... And I'm really interested to see who fykus pushes next.
Post
Post #208 (isolation #30) » Fri May 12, 2017 7:26 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
I mean Fykus at the time had 2 votes? To me there's not a real threat of a wagon until he's at least L-2 so I would have liked to have seen him get there. I think his comment is getting a little less attention than it should because of how early in rvs it is. I'm fine with you saying he's null right now but I don't see how you could town lean Fykus at this moment.
Post
Post #210 (isolation #31) » Sat May 13, 2017 1:07 am
Postby Tchill13 »
Why is fykus pushing jj though? The only guy that has brought up the L-1 comment other than me. Then fykus consistently pushes jj. Much easier cases are to be made against Not_mafia and maybe even cero right now rather than making a case against jj. Wouldn't scum try to do what town would be doing anyway?
Post
Post #220 (isolation #32) » Sat May 13, 2017 3:29 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
I understand kawls reluctance to the strategy. Either way it's a good idea. Not BP. Unless not_mafia confirms pretty soon he's not shit posting I feel like we should lynch him.
Post
Post #227 (isolation #33) » Sat May 13, 2017 4:34 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
He was my 2nd biggest scum lean. Towns not supposed to lie anyway. And as jj said he derailed the conversation. It's not sudden from me I haven't liked his play until this point.
Post
Post #235 (isolation #35) » Sat May 13, 2017 7:14 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
Well in the meantime you could post you're case that you said you were making. It's fine if you'd like to wait but I would like to see it eventually. Since you mentioned it.
Post
Post #248 (isolation #36) » Sun May 14, 2017 9:10 am
Postby Tchill13 »
So if someone claims BP can we take turns claiming jail keeper then tracker to make sure he's telling the truth? I'm not a fan of his game up until this point.
Post
Post #279 (isolation #44) » Sun May 14, 2017 10:44 am
Postby Tchill13 »
As I said. I'm lynched. Flip pr then NM is lynched. So town gets a ton of information out of that. You'd rather not lynch town when you don't have to though.
Post
Post #283 (isolation #45) » Sun May 14, 2017 10:50 am
Postby Tchill13 »
OK NM. So why aren't you OK with the idea that you're lynched. You flip BP. Then I'm lynched immediately? Town gets a ton of information out of that. town trades a PR for a scum. You don't seem to be alright with you getting lynched to put town in a better position though.
I'm not arguing because I'm a PR that understands trading a PR for scum is still okay as town. That with the fact that you've looked scummy because of your post before your claim.
Post
Post #327 (isolation #48) » Sun May 14, 2017 11:50 am
Postby Tchill13 »
NM literally didn't even scum hunt. I asked for reads from him earlier and he said he didn't have any. The only times he's posted was in HIS interest not towns. I was surprised by NM's claim because that is an absolutely terrible move on scum. Especially in the long run. It's a 1 to 1 trade even if it goes scums way.
Post
Post #340 (isolation #50) » Sun May 14, 2017 11:59 am
Postby Tchill13 »
In post 188, Not_Mafia wrote:I don't have any strong reads, and I'm not saying anything positive or negative about Cece being an alt, it's just speculation
After this post NM's next post he claimed bp. Nothing has happened other than this conversation about the counter claim for him to read Fykus and cero as possible scum.
Post
Post #342 (isolation #51) » Sun May 14, 2017 12:04 pm
Postby Tchill13 »
This is an extremely minor event from my standpoint because I'm a PR. There's no need to defend myself because Ik a PR trade for scum still helps. You looked scummy before your claim. Your argument as to why I might be scum CC'ing makes little to no sense. You had no reads before this discussion and now all of a sudden you do.
Post
Post #384 (isolation #57) » Wed May 17, 2017 6:50 am
Postby Tchill13 »
The fykus kill is extremely alarming. It would make sense to keep him alive because he would've been an easy push. If it wasn't for that I'd say it was probably a random kill. Now I doubt that. It makes sense for Zito to push cero hard and early if he's scum seeing how NM's play very early wasn't too strong.
I'm down to hammer before I do so. I don't think there's really anything to gain here.
This is what throws kawl into the scum lean for me. States he's OK with a hammer then disappears. He gave a reason but I'm not sure if I can believe that seeing how if he's scum he knew where that conversation was going.
Post
Post #397 (isolation #60) » Wed May 17, 2017 7:08 am
Postby Tchill13 »
So you have my 3 scum leans. Zito, kawl and Arnold in that order... If anything hammering conf scum puts you on his wagon. While the 1st thing ppl are going to look at are the other two "wagons" that weren't not_mafia