I think he's pushing people who it makes sense to push. He's a townlean. I need to really disagree with him on something in order to actually get a good read, though. There haven't been enough players floating around if you ask me.
See I was feeling like when fykus said he had a gut feeling it'd be me. Maybe it's not. I was just going off the fact that you pointed out his L-1 comment. Then he made a case against you. I pointed out his L-1 comment... And I'm really interested to see who fykus pushes next.
In post 202, Tchill13 wrote:See I was feeling like when fykus said he had a gut feeling it'd be me. Maybe it's not. I was just going off the fact that you pointed out his L-1 comment. Then he made a case against you. I pointed out his L-1 comment... And I'm really interested to see who fykus pushes next.
In post 18, Fykus wrote:I'm tempted to L-1 you but I suppose I shouldn't, just in case scum decide to pull a fast one.
VOTE: Jax Teller
Because I hated jax by the end of that show.
The way Fykus mentions he'd like to put him at L-1 here then doesn't. Easy attempt for town cred but jj would have more than likely Unvoted himself. Fykus then blows this off a few posts later. Zito and jj get into a discussion and Fykus states jj won... Seems "convenient" to me that jj lost his discussion with Zito after jj was the one who brought up Fykus' L-1 comment. I personally don't think either side "won" that discussion. Then Fykus' post on 132 seems to be grasping at straws a little. It's also very well put together and planned out which makes me see Fykus' argument as "I'm scum defending myself trying to throw the attention on jj"
tbh I would also not put anyone at L-1 in a newbie game so early in the game. I don't see it as an attempt for town cred at all. Just playing safe.
How would you think town should have reacted to the pressure Fykus was on?
Tchill, would you mind answering my question about Fykus?
In memory of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Radja's character pick in Survivor: 2016
I mean Fykus at the time had 2 votes? To me there's not a real threat of a wagon until he's at least L-2 so I would have liked to have seen him get there. I think his comment is getting a little less attention than it should because of how early in rvs it is. I'm fine with you saying he's null right now but I don't see how you could town lean Fykus at this moment.
In post 208, Tchill13 wrote:I mean Fykus at the time had 2 votes? To me there's not a real threat of a wagon until he's at least L-2 so I would have liked to have seen him get there. I think his comment is getting a little less attention than it should because of how early in rvs it is. I'm fine with you saying he's null right now but I don't see how you could town lean Fykus at this moment.
you're dodging the question here.
You said earlier:
Then Fykus' post on 132 seems to be grasping at straws a little. It's also very well put together and planned out which makes me see Fykus' argument as "I'm scum defending myself trying to throw the attention on jj"
I'm failing to see how you're seeing Fykus's argument as scum defending and throwing attention on someone else. Wouldn't town attempt to do the same thing by trying to scumhunt?
In memory of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Radja's character pick in Survivor: 2016
Why is fykus pushing jj though? The only guy that has brought up the L-1 comment other than me. Then fykus consistently pushes jj. Much easier cases are to be made against Not_mafia and maybe even cero right now rather than making a case against jj. Wouldn't scum try to do what town would be doing anyway?
Failure to adhere to stating whether or not you're BP will result in a policy vote from me (and hopefully others) since it is basically a scum claim.
From here on out, your first post should be BP or NOT BP. Once everyone has claimed we can move on with our lives (depending on whether or not there is a BP or NOT BP we made need to do a tracker or not tracker).
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
That's a legitimate concern and also the reason why I was pushing this to later, but I do believe we need to do this if we're playing to win.
However, I think we can get this done efficiently and get right back into scumhunting, provided people are active. Things end up getting slowed down when someone disagrees.
We may already have a resolution. If Not_Mafia is telling the truth then we're already done. If he was just shitposting then he is seriously getting lynched.
I understand kawls reluctance to the strategy. Either way it's a good idea. Not BP. Unless not_mafia confirms pretty soon he's not shit posting I feel like we should lynch him.
In post 219, jjh927 wrote:That's a legitimate concern and also the reason why I was pushing this to later, but I do believe we need to do this if we're playing to win.
However, I think we can get this done efficiently and get right back into scumhunting, provided people are active. Things end up getting slowed down when someone disagrees.
We may already have a resolution. If Not_Mafia is telling the truth then we're already done. If he was just shitposting then he is seriously getting lynched.
In post 220, Tchill13 wrote:I understand kawls reluctance to the strategy. Either way it's a good idea. Not BP. Unless not_mafia confirms pretty soon he's not shit posting I feel like we should lynch him.
Why the sudden call for lynch, you two? You weren't voting him before, and I seriously doubt that shitposting (this way, anyway) is a huge scumtell.
In memory of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Radja's character pick in Survivor: 2016
