VOTE: chennIn post 5, chennisden wrote:First
First is the worst.
Oh yah?
VOTE: Ankamius
Indeed. Can you list me some of your best past games?In post 105, Ankamius wrote:This game is getting spicy
Credit to gobbledygook (my teammate) for the observation.In post 129, Farkran wrote:This post is observant of you, but it lacks a conclusion statement - do you think deas flavor could be AI, or indicative of anything else relevant? Was it just a note?In post 106, EspressoPatronum wrote:Spoiler: a million flavour signals
You make crumbing look like a baking contest.
This makes a lot of sense. Thanks for expanding on your readIn post 1063, Volpe14 wrote:Can I Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V this from my hood?In post 1057, EspressoPatronum wrote:- why is Volpe townreading me so much?
I explained it there
but like, rough summary on the read I had (note that I dropped it as of now) is mostly because of your posting about DV's crumbing that later you give credit to your team amte.
I feel like your team mate if you're scum would only read the game to help you search for crumbs for PRs, which at first glance would really add up with the fact you noticed DV crumbing (if he's crumbing anyway? I'm not sure), but the fact you went ahead and posted it in the main thread makes me hesitant to think you've rolled scum, because I think as a newbie/newbie team you would be more hesitant of posting that you noticed someone crumbing when you guys are...hunting for crumbs from PRs.
I feel like scum would get more self-conscious there, while town noticing it would be like "this is really dumb/funny so let's post it".
To my knowledge, I have no reputation as being easy lynchbait. If anything, my reputation is more that I obvtown eventually.In post 1064, Farkran wrote:...why do even you think of yourself as easy lynchbait? Are you famous for always rolling scum or something? Because i really see no indication of you being a low hanging fruit or lynchbait so farIn post 1057, EspressoPatronum wrote:My team's reads mixed with some observations from skimming:
- why is Volpe townreading me so much?
- Elements is on par with his town game
- Ank's scumread on me is low hanging fruit. Maybe Ank is doing a slayer's play? The full town reads list with only me as scum is weird.
- if Volpe!scum, FL shouldn't get a free pass
Maybe. While the comment about not getting a free pass came from a teammate that knows FL pretty well, I'm aware of FL's reputation for big plays as scum.Also do you think that volpe and FL would put THAT much effort into distancing? I could see FL doing that, hardly volpe, based on the profile i've drawn of the two slots. I made peace with them never being in the same scumteam.
Three reasons:In post 1072, Volpe14 wrote:Espresso any reason you're less active here than what you usually are?
Farkran has been quite active. He's got plenty of recent posts.In post 1077, Almost50 wrote:Which reminds me: Where did he go? Did he post anything in the 30yish pages?? Remains to be seenIn post 666, Ankamius wrote:and I'm not convinced people haven't been scumreading farkran because of playstyle
Naked vote.
Why?
This is a more eloquent and wordy way of saying we should lynch the lurkers.In post 1380, Almost50 wrote:I still want to poke the lower posters sooner than later. It is usually the case that some scum are active and blending, while some take a back seat and watch while the more active layers tear each other apart. Usually the active scums are the ones with character and can produce content and even take some pressure without falling apart. The silent ones are the ones more prone to slip or break under pressure, so safer to keep quiet for as long as they can.
We can always come back to where each of us is right now in like 96 hours, but for the duration of those 96 hours we should all be trying to force the low posters to come play the game so we have a better idea on the whole thing not just the players in the spotlight.
Now can we build wagons on the silent ones with the threat that a wagon may actually lead to a lynch if they don't provide a good reason not to?
In post 1549, Volpe14 wrote:When Elems was going crazy I don't think he would be checking scum PT and I think a hypothetical partner would need to reach out to him in thread for him to stop.In post 1545, nomnomnom wrote:why live coach when scums have a PT?
Not saying it's the most likely right now just saying I shouldn't rule out the possibility completely like before.
He's asking you to tone down the toxicity. It's not a big ask tbh.In post 1674, nomnomnom wrote:Yeah yeah I'm faking my emotions now blah blah blah look at me I am confbiasing my ass off because of what I think is logical in a game where logic has no place unless i'm a cop and it says WOAH YOU LOOKED AT SCUM TONIGHT!In post 1672, Farkran wrote:@nom
on the unlikely offchance that you are town you should stop insulting people who scumread you and start trying to identify who could be scum on your wagon, if any, and who could be scum off wagon. You have a unique POV that allows you to identify whose push is scumsided and whose is genuine and if you're town you should be doing that
pedit You're not even ateing properly, it feels overblown
fuck outta here im done
Gotta watch out for anyone who says they're 'pretty good' at Smash Bros.In post 1709, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m pretty good at smash.
How so?In post 1902, nomnomnom wrote:I find the content of his posts absolute garbage but that's just me.
I personally don't think I am, but at least 3 people have said that.In post 1904, nomnomnom wrote:How are you an easy mislynch where the hell did you get that from reading this gamestate lol
You didn't read my post
Why do you think this?In post 2190, Ankamius wrote:I think enough has been said about the neighborhoods in general
Right, but the scum team probably knows the distribution of most hoods already.In post 2193, Ankamius wrote:essentially
I have a nasty feeling that the scumteam would get a lot better use out of all this shit than town would, and I fully believe town would just barge through with forcing the issue anyways
I'm not sure I really buy the floodgates argument here. You're saying that we shouldn't reveal group distribution information because it will inevitably lead to a micromanaging game.In post 2192, Ankamius wrote:because this is the first step in micromanaging the mechanics of the game
and I know this playerlist well enough to fully believe that if this first step is taken, then it's going to be forced through all the way to the end.
and I'd really rather not play to try to maximize potential of the roles when there's a very real possibility that it will just blow up in our faces instead and leave us with no use of basically any of them
we'd be sacrificing too much for ~M~A~Y~B~E~ getting some use out of our PRs, and honestly beyond that I don't think town is in a position where we are able to properly use whatever we have even if we can manage to get use of them properly
I like this response + it deserves a proper answer. I have to go for most of the day, but I'll get to this once I'm back tonight.In post 2197, Vex Vience wrote:outing hood powers are bad. outing neighbors is ok, ig? i mean, it could possibly help nail down reads from people, and it would get dialogue about them open, but like, what incentive does scum have to shoot the all-town hoods, knowing it’ll give them their last-man standing? wouldn’t scum want to shoot into their own hoods for it?
based on the night reveal, let’s assume the writers are all town. scum knows that group is all town and when there’s only one left, they become a vigi. that’s bad for scum. someone can easily shoot and kill them at that point. whereas, if the hood has scum in it, wouldnt they want to shoot the others in the hood—ignoring the all-town hoods—to get the extra nk?
Getting back to this from earlier:In post 2198, Vex Vience wrote:i see your logic behind it, somewhat, ep. but it doesn’t really make that much sense ultimately. i dont see the motive scum has to shoot all-town to give them their last-man standing, when scum would wanna take it from their own hoods.
I didn't say we should out all group stuff. I said we should out the members of each neighbourhood.In post 2206, kuribo wrote:That's such an easy slip to fake though and it's been done dozens of times over the years.In post 2200, Vex Vience wrote:ep’s probably townie because of that statement though. i dont think scum forgets they have a factional chat.
I don't like the whole "We should just out all the group stuff." Fun Fact, in two of the three previous Gay Mafia games, the scumteam had most of the town's claims by Day 2 because town just kept blurting them out like dummies.
You say that some/most of my argument is right. What part of my argument is wrong?
I don't understand how me advocating to out neighbours ==> exactly 4 scum hoods.In post 2225, Almost50 wrote:Actually, fuck it:
VOTE: EP
My most confident SR at the moment, and I think if you reread his posts of today you'd deduce there are exactly 4 scums (i.e. we have TWO all-town hoods).
[...]
I'm glad you agree.In post 2251, nomnomnom wrote:I think we should also out neighbors in general. Not the powers, just the composition of the neighborhoods.
Did you read the entirety of my post?In post 2267, MariaR wrote:[...]Outting who has a hood with each other was stupid in the first place but considering we did some of that day 1 it’s kinda late for that. But I don’t see any reason to fully do it and just put ourself out on a line like that.In post 2186, EspressoPatronum wrote:TL;DR knowing hood members might help us out in the long run. Sharing this info is low risk because scum already knows the information anyway.
I've admittedly been absent this, but I think discussing our treatment of the hoods is a valuable step in gaining some team cohesion.In post 2277, MariaR wrote:Yeah this game was played really poorly on a mech standpoint and this town has like no teamwork atm. (Besides a select few people)In post 2276, Ankamius wrote:to hell?In post 2274, MariaR wrote:Well I'm right here ya know You more than anyone should know my opinion on where I think this is gonna go
Jokes on you bcz my hood already got outed.
Per last night's public role, we learn the power of a specific hood per the flavour of the hood.In post 2317, kuribo wrote:The problem with outting who's in what hoods is that yeah, scum knows which hoods have their members in them and which neighborhoods are all town
But they don't know who's in what groups unless there's a scum in them. We already know that an ability existed last night that publicized a group's abilities. Claiming who's in what groups gives them a roadmap as to who they should prioritize should they find out other group abilities.
As stated above, all I'm advocating for is the following:Lemme soften it down a bit:
Players A B C and Fuckwad claim to all be in group Sitting Ducks.
Scum uses an ability to find out to find out what the Sitting Ducks do. And it's a good one. So they start killing off that group. Or they know who to play against one another to fuck with that group ability and they know who to pocket.
They already know the makeups of the groups they're in. Why the fuck does it help the town to just fill the blanks in for the scum team?
In post 2318, chennisden wrote:because it's antitownIn post 2316, EspressoPatronum wrote:Jokes on you bcz my hood already got outed.
But actually... why do you think this?
Why do you think that scum can gain control of town hoods?In post 2319, chennisden wrote:there are probably some town hoods that get REALLY REALLY bad if scum controls them.
this hood discussion is REALLY REALLY bad for the gamestate.
you guys outing your hoods like dumbshits is REALLY REALLY bad for my sanity.
I don't think you understand my argument.In post 2321, chennisden wrote:It's like saying "if I'm a dumbass I'll give you 100 dollars"
1) no reward
2) risk
3) you're probably a dumbass, you're losing 100 dollars
now change "a dumbass" to "antitown" and change "I'll give you 100 dollars" to "I'll help scum for shits and giggles"
Because I've observed that the Mafiascum site culture is to treat your scumreads like human trash. I think it's gross tbh.In post 2322, chennisden wrote:Also
Does town REALLY say "I get that you think I'm scum, but can you pretend I'm town for a moment and walk me through your reasoning?"
I think you might be assuming a max of 1 scum can be in any given hood. I see no reason to believe this yet, so I think drawing inferences from such an assumption is incorrect at the moment.In post 2320, Almost50 wrote:If there were 5 scums then you already know who the 3 players in the all-town hood are. I did reconsider 4 though and said there may only be 3 scums with lots of power based on a recent game I was in.In post 2314, EspressoPatronum wrote:I get that you think I'm scum, but can you pretend I'm town for a moment and walk me through your reasoning?
By knowing the distribution of hoods, town gains the following two benefits:The thing is Town does NOT benefit AT ALL from outing the distribution of the hoods. Like, what would it change for you -assuming you're town like you requested- to know X, Y & Z are grouped together? Would it make any of them look townier/scummier to you? I don't think it would. It just gives scum a missing part of the puzzle they're not yet privy to. At least that's the way I see it.
How does scum not know the information already?So, basically: You argue that scum already know and I argue they probably don't. You argue that it doesn't hurt the town and I say it doesn't benefit the town.
2323
You're right - I don't know that. I asked you what you thought of it and told you why I agreed with it.In post 2327, kuribo wrote:1. You can't know that, and planning around what someone else might do is a real quick track to the bottomIn post 2323, EspressoPatronum wrote:1. What do you think of Vex's point that scum is disincentived from killing all-town hoods? We all know that the survivor powers are really strong, so why would scum want to give all-town hoods the survivor powers? I think it's more likely that scum would want to kill or lynch within scum hoods to gain control of powers.
2. Scum already has wayyy more information than town, as they know some/most of the information on: hood powers, hood survivor powers, hood distribution, and hood flavour. Since the disparity is already so wide, I think the risk posed by your Sitting Ducks example is worth the potential gain of town-wide information.
It honestly feels like you didn't read any of my 'information disparity' section in my earlier wall post.2. Yes they have information on which groups they themselves are in. Instead of knowing "A B C D E F And G are in different groups from us but we don't know which," they would now know A, D, and G are in one group, etc. So your solution is to give them even more information, got it.
Vote: EspressoPatronum
VOTE: Chenn btwIn post 2325, EspressoPatronum wrote:@chenn you also did something like this back in Korina's cultafia game, in which you (as cult) tried to weaponize your domino theory against my reads lists.
Lol, so you explained your reasoning but refuse to engage with mine.In post 2331, kuribo wrote:I don't read walls I bust balls
For that matter, I don't make cases I eat faces
And I already explained my reasoning: it tells us nothing useful and fills in the blanks for scum
[...]
I'd like to think we could both be right about some aspects of our arguments, but I will never know bcz you apparently haven't read mine in detail.In post 2334, kuribo wrote:Because your reasoning is fucking stupid.
And your counterpoint is literally "Okay you're right but what if I'm right"
Lol, I see what you did there. Thumbs up for being clever, but a big thumbs down for the disingenuous attack.In post 2343, chennisden wrote:I don't think you understand my argument.
You keep telling me that outing hood membership (AGAIN: not flavour, power, or survivor) is good, but you have yet to point to a convincing reason why.
Good point here - thanks for laying it out. It requires a bit of luck, but I definitely agree that a favourable kill distribution on all-town hoods can only result from not outing member distribution.In post 2347, davesaz wrote:Mathematics.In post 2324, EspressoPatronum wrote:You keep telling me that outing hood membership (AGAIN: not flavour, power, or survivor) is bad, but you have yet to point to a convincing reason why.
Specifically, suppose there are 6 town that need to be killed to get rid of 2 all-town hoods worth of powers. A,B,C and D,E,F
If scum kill A,B,D,E then C gets 2 nights of last standing and F gets 1 night.
If scum kill A,B,C,... then C gets only 1 night of last standing. It is clearly better for scum to know this split.
It's especially bad if there are scum and a SK, and they double hit on the 2nd night because then there is no last standing night at all.
When you run through various sequences of lynches/kills/night actions, those all-town hoods get more done when they are not outed.
This is correct.In post 2349, chennisden wrote:Also if we massclaim
SCUM KNOW WHICH HOODS ARE ALL-TOWN. TOWN DON'T. THIS HELPS SCUM.
In post 2350, chennisden wrote:Also I don't really want to be the one to talk about this but it's fairly likely that scum are concentrated in hoods.
Interesting take. Why do you think this?In post 2353, chennisden wrote:As in, scum probably are in at most 3 hoods. Probably 2In post 2350, chennisden wrote:Also I don't really want to be the one to talk about this but it's fairly likely that scum are concentrated in hoods.
In post 2339, Almost50 wrote:I am fairly confident of it, and I have my reasons:In post 2328, EspressoPatronum wrote:I think you might be assuming a max of 1 scum can be in any given hood.
1- I was in a game that was close enough to this design recently.
2- Putting 2 scums in a 3-players hood with a "last standing man ability" sounds a bit silly. It's as if the designer wanted to reward scum for busing (or compensate them if one of them got lynched). "Hey, you lost a comrade, so take this ability to compensate for it".
3- Also 2 scums in a hood makes it an all-scum hood in practice. The hood's ability is decided by voting, so scum will always have the majority in said hood (and will never need to kill their town neighbor unless one of them got lynched/vigged)
Consider #3 for the outed abilities: 2 scums would be able to make a 3rd scum (not in their hood) untargetable, or they would make a townie that's likely to vote one of them voteless. See why it's an absurd proposition to have a 2s-1t hood in this setup?
Unless -if course- we are being trolled and there is an all-scum hood + 1 scum in one of the other 5 hoods, in which case your proposition to out the distribution becomes even more destructive to town.
I hadn't considered that some town's would be specifically designed as all-town.In post 2356, chennisden wrote:I would say the all town hoods,by design, probably have stronger powers that scum would want to exploit.
Just because there are no scum in a hood doesn't mean there are no tools for scum to control a hood. Scum know whether this is the case or not. We don't.
I think it's very bad to do this when this sort of game is designed specifically to fuck over bad town play (i.e. massclaiming hoods for no reason).
I haven't had the time to give this game the attention it deserves. I posted a short list of reasons why to Volpe a few days ago if you want to check. In short, I was crazy busy at the beginning of Jan, but my schedule will be a lot lighter on the 13th.In post 2434, MariaR wrote:For the 4th (maybe 5th) time.
Ep has proven they're a competent/smart player just with posting alone. So, if we look at their early posts with the awful push onAnk that I already explained. Combined with the 'scum have a chat thing' that I never will believe. I think he's just playing dumb and doesn't really believe the stuff he's saying. Outting the neighborhoods is wrong I've said why before. EP asked me to explain but I already have done that. What more am I supposed to do? His responses to the hint of pressure before were weak as well. I just don't like their posts and don't think it's real. Why am I wrong?
I'm not sure I can here, lol.In post 2471, nomnomnom wrote:I've heard it all befoooooreIn post 2469, chennisden wrote:so i had a thought process, and i would play devil's advocate and think of reasons nom/EP should not die
and i came blank
And I
can take care of myself