Newbie 1572 - Chicken Parmigiana Mafia (Over)
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 22, Bitmap wrote:In post 21, Pramitz wrote:Just gut?
Gut applied Logic. Your "Am I scum?" felt appeasy.
I'm the one who said "Are you scum?" and I was making a point. There's no useful read from responses to that question. It's complete WIFOM, so I just pointed your own question back at you-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 25, Bitmap wrote:
In post 24, Drixx wrote:In post 22, Bitmap wrote:In post 21, Pramitz wrote:Just gut?
Gut applied Logic. Your "Am I scum?" felt appeasy.
I'm the one who said "Are you scum?" and I was making a point. There's no useful read from responses to that question. It's complete WIFOM, so I just pointed your own question back at you
Tryhard.
Is this supposed to be a bad thing?-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 42, zombiekitty wrote:
This answer just felt off to me. Sort of evading the question in a way.
You've already said why you sllight scumread Pramitz. You haven't explained why you have those reads on them. Care to explain why? Feels/gut?
In post 24, Drixx wrote:In post 22, Bitmap wrote:In post 21, Pramitz wrote:Just gut?
Gut applied Logic. Your "Am I scum?" felt appeasy.
I'm the one who said "Are you scum?" and I was making a point. There's no useful read from responses to that question. It's complete WIFOM, so I just pointed your own question back at you
Interesting reply though. To somebody who was saying something to somebody else and not you.
What was the point of saying whatever you said to Bitmap here? He was talking to Pramitz about why he read him as slight scum. The way you're explaining how you were making a point about your "Are you scum" question wasn't necessary. Bitmap hadn't even explained why he had slight scumread you. Feels like you're scum hastily trying to defend yourself from something that could've been a slip on your part.
I was just pretty sure Bitmap replied to the wrong person but was talking to me. I don't recall anyone else turning the question back around and pointing it at her. That's why I began the post by pointing out that I was the one who said it, not Pramitz. Also ... it feels like you're trying to scrape up some reason to justify a vote. FoS @ Zombiekitty
In post 43, Bitmap wrote:In post 42, zombiekitty wrote:
You've already said why you sllight scumread Pramitz. You haven't explained why you have those reads on them. Care to explain why? Feels/gut?
ika felt town because scum players are more closed if meta is not applied.
Drixx felt scummy because he's appeasy as well and trying to get confirmation from the town.
This looks like poor scum play. Good scum can make cases based upon the behavior of other players and using logic. Bad scum players have to talk about "feelings" and make up reasons to vote.
Unvote
VOTE: Bitmap[/b]
Serious vote. Bitmap is slinging the proverbial pasta all over the place and trying to see what will stick. Classic first day scum play. Bitmap is also trying to claim that reading people for reasons that don't have anything to do with alignment is "a playstyle", which is a laughable defense. Bitmap then goes on the attack and calls someone who just replaced into the game "lazy". Bitmap = Scummy McScumpherson.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 50, Bitmap wrote:Alright, I'm going to teach you guys about mafia because I'm going through one of those hyper-activity aggressive phases.
First off, go look at your role PM. Mine says I'm some form of town. (DO NOT QUOTE YOUR ROLE PM THOUGH)
Why the fuck do I need confirmation from other players if I'm town or not? I know I'm town. I don't have to appease anyone. I'm going to shit on people if they need to know if they're town because they're trying to suck up to the town in order to not get lynched. I'm going to post reads on what I think of people because why would I hide what I think about people? I'm town. I don't need to cherry pick my words. Scum has to cherry pick their words. This is why hyper-active people are usually town.
LAMIST much? The last line is an outright lie. Activity has no correlation with alignment.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
From what I can tell, Bitmap is either really BAD at mafia or is pretending to be. Be wary of anything he's selling as lessons (RE: Post #50).
First he's going to teach us about mafia, and the reason is that he's going through "one of those hyper-activity aggressive phases." - I can agree with the aggressive part. Apparently he's one of those people who uses profanity enough to make a sailor blush. Why? Reasons.
Then he tells you to look at your role PM and slips in not only a "Look At Me I'm So Townie (LAMIST)" but also throws in a bit of Wine with the "some form" bit, implying possible PR status. This is a decent play if he's actually a VT, because it might be enough to get team scum to kill him. It's also a decent play as scum because he's thrown out a breadcrumb super early in case he has to claim a PR.
Then comes the random profanity. Since Bitmap is playing dumb, I'll explain why townies need to read as townies: the town only gets a small number of mislynches before they lose. If you don't learn how to play town properly, and you get lynched a lot as town because you look scummy, then you are hurting your win condition and the other players every game you play. It's important to avoid looking scummy. In fact, it's a really good skill to develop, both for town and scum play. Ideally, every time you land Vanilla Townie, you want to become a trusted probtown/conftown to most of the game so the mafia have to seriously consider killing you. Any time you can eat a night kill as a VT, you are helping town big time.
Everyone should be careful of words and phrasing. Using phrases like "I'll be honest" and such are pretty classic scum tells, for example. Using them as town is just bad play; Bitmap's assertion that only scum need to put any care into word choice is atrociously bad.
And finally ... Alignment has no causal relationship with activity. Period. -- Hyper-active townies who are abrasive and profane and abusive to other players often get into town v. town fights and give scum an easy smokescreen to hide in, so you will frequently see games where active townies cause scum to simply go with the flow. In those cases, the scum aren't posting less or being less active because they're scum ... they're doing so because the townies in question are making things easy for them.
That whole post is tripe Bitmap.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 64, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:In post 51, Diego1487 wrote:In post 48, Drixx wrote:Bitmap is slinging the proverbial pasta all over the place and trying to see what will stick. Classic first day scum play.
@Trip Ds, as resident IC, what's your view on this?
I can definitely see that as a scum play, but also as a town play. Throw shit against the wall and see who squeals the most is scum.
It's nonsense. I mean really nonsensical; scum are the ones who toss things around and try to get them to stick on day one? Scum have some information, namely who scum are, so they can usually target better than average while town have no such information and thus would be more likely to cast a wide net. That being said nothing Bitmap has done has felt like "slinging proverbial pasta all over the place" to me anyways.
In post 55, Drixx wrote:In post 50, Bitmap wrote:Alright, I'm going to teach you guys about mafia because I'm going through one of those hyper-activity aggressive phases.
First off, go look at your role PM. Mine says I'm some form of town. (DO NOT QUOTE YOUR ROLE PM THOUGH)
Why the fuck do I need confirmation from other players if I'm town or not? I know I'm town. I don't have to appease anyone. I'm going to shit on people if they need to know if they're town because they're trying to suck up to the town in order to not get lynched. I'm going to post reads on what I think of people because why would I hide what I think about people? I'm town. I don't need to cherry pick my words. Scum has to cherry pick their words. This is why hyper-active people are usually town.
LAMIST much? The last line is an outright lie. Activity has no correlation with alignment.
Activity has a relatively high correlation with alignment; there are of course exceptions and outliers but it's not something to be ignored.
Bad IC is Bad. Scum are looking for PRs on day one (motive to get responses), and if scum always did the same thing then town would win every game. You can't rule anything out as scum behavior.
I updated from correlation to causation. Alignment doesn't have a causal relationship to activity.
It's amusing to see you basically saying that active players should be considered town when I just got done a game where I replaced into a scum slot that had been scum read by the most experienced players and used activity to get a flawless scum win. Like I said ... you can't make any statements about what scum will or won't do. The more you teach new players to expect some certain thing, the more they're gonna get suckered by good scum players.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 75, Bitmap wrote:I just want to see DDD's response because I know he'll tear you a new asshole and it's fun when he does that.
So you think the job of the IC is to "tear (people) a new asshole" who are new to the site? Interesting perspective. I thought the job of the IC was to give their best opinion on theory and try to help players new (both to the game and the site). My experience comes from elsewhere, so I freely admit I've got plenty to learn here. I came here for a reason. I learned the meta and the players that I played with elsewhere pretty well, and this place as a top notch rep for very in depth theory and high level play.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
@Zombiekitty - You'll have to forgive me on the "declaration of honesty" statements. I have played forum mafia with a much smaller playgroup the last few years, and in our meta that was almost always a scum tell. The idea behind that is that if someone feels the subconscious need to reinforce that what they are about to say is true, then the implication is that other things they are saying or have said are not true. Do with that what you will.
As far as activity and alignment, please note I updated that to what I intended to say. Correlation is a very loose thing. Causation is what I was trying to say. Alignment does not have a causal relationship with activity. Many factors in the game dictate how scum need to play to achieve their win condition. If the town is super active, the scum obviously can't hardcore lurk through the game. Similarly, if town has a lot of low activity, scum can ease through without saying a whole lot. Would you agree that the way the game unfolds has more to do with activity (especially for scum) than simple alignment assignment? If you disagree, why?-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
When I am scum hunting, I rate people on activity on a scale with 5 positions. Scum are almost never on the bottom two when the game is over. (The bottom two levels are "just barely active enough to avoid replacement/modkill" and "so inactive they need replacement/modkill"). I'm currently in my 2nd and 3rd games here on this site, though, so that will adjust as I accrue experience here. Personally I have a pretty low tolerance for lurkers.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 90, Bitmap wrote:I do a meta read on Drixx later.
That will be a bit of a waste of your time. I'm in my 2nd and 3rd games on site, and I was posting huge walls of text and using hyperactivity in my first game when I replaced into a scum slot. I'm intentionally avoiding doing that as a general rule, and my posts are therefore more succinct, and sometimes truncated for that reason.
It seems interesting how much you seem to be attempting to run/guide the game.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 93, fjkldsjh wrote:After closer inspection, Bitmap is probably town. Diego is scum.
Any reasons for these revelations? If you are sure Diego is scum, why didn't you vote for him along with this declaration. You used the modifier "probably" for bitmap, but you didn't qualify with Diego.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 110, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:In post 72, Drixx wrote:Bad IC is Bad.Scum are looking for PRs on day one(motive to get responses), and if scum always did the same thing then town would win every game. You can't rule anything out as scum behavior.
I like the part in bold where you tell me what scum do and then tell me scum never always do the same thing. Contradiction thy name is Drixx. But more importantly, how about we just make the correction assumption that not everything should be taken literally; when I call someone town or scum it's not because I know they are it's because I think they are and when I say something scummy it's not that I think scum always do it but that I think scum are more likely to do it or I think it's not scummy because I think scum are less likely to do it.
In post 72, Drixx wrote:I updated from correlation to causation. Alignment doesn't have a causal relationship to activity.
Well obviously, the literal only thing that has a causal relationship with being scum is receiving a scum PM. That being said there is a correlation between activity and alignment.
In post 72, Drixx wrote:It's amusing to see you basically saying that active players should be considered town when I just got done a game where I replaced into a scum slot that had been scum read by the most experienced players and used activity to get a flawless scum win. Like I said ... you can't make any statements about what scum will or won't do. The more you teach new players to expect some certain thing, the more they're gonna get suckered by good scum players.
The plural of anecdote is not data. Furthermore, you're acting like I've said we should lynch people in exact order from least posts to most posts. I haven't. But when in doubt between two players or stuck for a direction, I find lynching those who are posting less than they should or posting without actually saying anything is a good fallback.
Good response. Thank you. There's not really a contradiction though. What scum do as far as posts in the game and what they are doing in their minds are two different things. I would say what goes in the thread should be considered what the scum do (action) while things they are thinking about or looking for (like PRs) should be considered what scum generally think (not action). I think you can make a number of pretty sound assumptions about what a good scum team will be "doing" as far as their thinking goes. Looking for PRs is obvious. Identifying who will be most dangerous to them. Identifying players they think they might be able to get mislynched without getting themselves caught for it.
What scum will actually do as far as the plays they make and what they will say or how active they will be? I don't think that's really something you can safely assume in any single game. It may be true that in the big picture game of all the thousands of games that have been played on this site, there is a correlation between alignment and activity. I haven't done that sort of analysis so I couldn't say for sure. But even if there is, applying large scale probabilities and correlations to a game as if they are universally true is a dangerous path to tread. I believe this is essentially what you were saying about my anecdote, but in reverse. One case doesn't invalidate a correlation or a probability, but it does illustrate why counting on those things might not be super wise.
A similar point could be made about VCA, but VCA is a bit of theory for after the first lynch, yes?-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 115, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:In post 113, Drixx wrote:What scum will actually do as far as the plays they make and what they will say or how active they will be? I don't think that's really something you can safely assume in any single game. It may be true that in the big picture game of all the thousands of games that have been played on this site, there is a correlation between alignment and activity. I haven't done that sort of analysis so I couldn't say for sure. But even if there is, applying large scale probabilities and correlations to a game as if they are universally true is a dangerous path to tread. I believe this is essentially what you were saying about my anecdote, but in reverse. One case doesn't invalidate a correlation or a probability, but it does illustrate why counting on those things might not be super wise.
A similar point could be made about VCA, but VCA is a bit of theory for after the first lynch, yes?
Aren't you just arguing against the existence of scumtells here? In a single game, sure, activity might not be a reliable indicator, maybe somebody saying "to be honest" is town (if we believe that to be reliable on a larger scale), maybe the Amished tell isn't reliable (and no I'm not telling you what that one is) but that doesn't mean you don't apply them, it means you don't blindly apply them without thought.
And I think VCA is rubbish.
~~
Reading Diego.
That's exactly the point I was getting at. Nothing exists in a vacuum. It's really easy when you are in the dark (as you are very likely to be the majority of the time in mafia) to tunnel vision in on tells you've learned or things you read from sound theorycrafting or learned from other players. I'm a big fan of trying to view things from various PoVs and continuously question what I think I know. I appreciate the responses, and the viewpoint.
I would be interested to know why you think VCA is rubbish, but that can be after the game if you don't feel it's useful to the game at hand to discuss it.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 126, Diego1487 wrote:In post 92, Drixx wrote:In post 90, Bitmap wrote:I do a meta read on Drixx later.
That will be a bit of a waste of your time. I'm in my 2nd and 3rd games on site, and I was posting huge walls of text and using hyperactivity in my first game when I replaced into a scum slot. I'm intentionally avoiding doing that as a general rule, and my posts are therefore more succinct, and sometimes truncated for that reason.
It seems interesting how much you seem to be attempting to run/guide the game.
There is more to meta than finding post lengths and activity level. What I find interesting is your annoyance of Bitmap's playstlyle when you also try to run/guide the game.
I don't feel like I'm overly dominating the game or trying to push it in any particular direction. I do have a severe dislike for lurking. I suppose I probably get pretty pushy when it comes to that. If you elaborate, it would be helpful to me to be more aware of what I'm doing. It's fairly easy to do things without intending to.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
What constitutes a "wall" post? I don't believe I even have the longest post in the game, nor are my posts consistently long. From the newbie games so far (of which I've completed one and am playing in two others), this site doesn't appear to actually have 'generally accepted theory'. If you think I can't talk theory a bit and scumhunt at the same time, you're sadly mistaken.
I'm sorry you didn't like post #57.
I don't particularly believe that evaluating someone's play on a meta level is necessarily useful. You seem to think it is, and that I don't understand. I came to this site specifically to learn from folks here and to improve my own play. I'm interested in what you find useful about evaluating someone's meta-play, especially what I'm not accounting for. If it's game-sensitive, feel free to wait until after game.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I'm still learning my way Pramitz. It probably doesn't help that I'm an academic in a field that most people find very boring. I'll check out your ISO and try to pick up some ways to make my posts less boring. The main points of this game are to have fun and to match wits with people. Neither are much fun for everyone else if I'm a bore.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I'm a little confused by the atmosphere of this particular game. It's in the newbie queue, and I understood the point of this queue is to let folks come and learn. I've played essentially all of my forum mafia with a small playgroup on a website and forums meant for something else, where mafia was just a side thing. If I don't clear out the stuff that only applies to that playgroup or that became "accepted theory" in that much smaller group of players and set of games, and if I don't ask questions, how am I meant to learn and adapt to the theory and players here?
I do know that the SE/IC slots are supposed to be in the game to help those of us newer to the game, and yet an SE came after me personally and flung a homophobic slur at me and another player in the process, then later said they were going to enjoy the IC "ripping me a new asshole", and now the IC is enjoying a "knockout punch".
Is the point of the games in this queue to beat up on new people and mock them and attack them if they don't automatically understand everything the way it has been established here over what looks to be the course of a decade+ and thousands of games? That seems sort of quite opposite the point of the newbie games, at the very least.
And before someone makes some claim about "constructive criticism" or some such, it's only constructive when you criticize someone's play (and not when you attack them personally or publicly relish in "knockout punches" and "ripping of new assholes"),and alsogive them feedback to correct and improve said play. For people who are supposedly volunteering their experience and time to "help" me and other new people learn and get better, I see an awful lot of "it's really fun to abuse and knock around the n00bs" attitude here. What's up with that?-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I choose A. I appreciate the responses. I threw that post up during my lunch break mostly out of frustration (obviously). It would be nice to see the game actually motor back to life a bit more and continue on.
By the way, I did some looking for "Amished Tell" and that was thwarted by the existence of a television show about the Amish mafia, although there is a wiki page on this site about/by a player from some years ago named "Amished" who seemed to have a bit of a tough start. I know you said you wouldn't tell me what that is, and perhaps that's an inside joke or something of the sort, or perhaps it's simply pragmatic. Maybe after the game? I'm curious and looking for answers hasn't yielded much that leads to a conclusion.
As far as the game goes in general, I don't want to leave the wrong impression, especially since I don't plan to stop playing and so I'll likely see you folks again in other games. I've been around the internet since before Mosaic and I've seen a great deal more nastiness and ugly crap elsewhere. Mafia is a game that revolves around conflicts, and conflict produces emotion and sometimes things get heated. I get that. I will continue to try and conduct myself with composure and hope my post from frustration isn't a huge problem.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 165, Pramitz wrote:In post 155, Pramitz wrote:fjkldsjh, any reason for ignoring all of the questions directed at you?
I am ready for a lynch
not really, i want subs to talk
but can we kill this guy today?
What Bitmap said earlier interested me. I don't, at the moment, understand the case against "letters". I'm going to do a re-read in the morning when I'm not tired and try and do a proper full read. I'm rubbish at being sure people are town (apart from when I'm scum, obviously), and what I find hardest about being town is being sure who the other town are so I can apply PoE. Furthermore, it makes it hard for me to realize when scum are manipulating a wagon.
As a result of that weakness, I'm super frustrated by this wagon on "letters". I just don't get it. Hopefully a re-read will help.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Unvote
VOTE: DDD
Voted "letters" for asking for reads. Seems to me that the IC is an obvious choice to ask for reads. That, I think, is what was making me uncomfortable about the numbers wagon; that is, the first one on, and the how. DDD later responded to "letters" request for a couple specific reads, but did a sort of rough overview, said he didn't see why he needed to read someone (a very odd statement since identifying probable town is just as necessary as identifying scum) and then asked a very odd question at the end.
The other thing that bothers me about DDD on the re-read is that he stated, unequivocally, that Bitmapistown, based upon a small sample size of posts and some prior gameplay together. Since both are experienced, this bothers me on several levels:
1.) It's a scum tell to declare that someoneistown, without any qualifier. Scum are the informed minority and the only ones who know for sure.
2.) This declaration, if it were accurate, would mean that Bitmap, despite being a very experienced player, would be so easy to meta read that one can know within a few posts whether he's town or not. That's pretty hard to swallow.
DDD seems pretty smart. He hasn't put a lot on the record, and what is there is problematic. Vouching for another player without any qualification. Starting a wagon without any explanation. It doesn't really make much sense on re-read, not even in what little flow we've had in so few posts for the time.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Gee, I'm flattered. I'm so bad I have my own level of badness. As you say though, DDD, playing is the way to get better.
Even if you take the qualifier bit out (and itispotentially a scum slip. Whether someone with 5k+ posts and your experience level would make it is an open question), you still threw out a town read on bitmap, at a time when you yourself say nobody was pressuring Bitmap. So we're still sitting at the question of whether Bitmap has such an identifiable meta that he can be identified as town within a few posts of the start of a game, and the question of why you felt the need to preemptively say he's town.
One interesting thing I noticed in my re-read is that you only respond to parts of posts. Anything you can answer in a dismissive way, you will. If there's something you can't answer ... you just ignore it.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 182, ika wrote:my normal play is really abrasive and no reasons but when im here in these games i play diffrent to accomade newbies
Abraisive play is a good way to take advantage of folks who will respond out of emotion. From emotion comes slips and tells. I'm not sure you're doing new players any favors by putting off that lesson.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I'm not sure I follow that logic. Jumping off a wagon that seems nearly certain to be the lynch of the day will call a ridiculous amount of attention to anyone who does so.
Let me ask you a question Diego, presuming we lynch letters: What would you think about your reads (especially bitmap) whichever way letters flips? (I'm asking for both ways).-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I'm not sure my reasons for voting DDD are flimsy. He ignored some of them when responding to me, which is a bit of a red flag. Read his ISO. How is he actually pushing the game in a town way? He engaged with me on theory posts, which is part of being an IC as I understand it, but beyond that, what's he actually done, apart from what I pointed out?
Despite re-reading the thread twice now, not exactly a chore given how short it is, I still don't see why the lynch on letters got started or what the reason for it is. I view others (including DDD) as more likely to be scum than letters.
So, given that you are voting for Letters, it would be helpful to me if you explained why he's scummy. Maybe some thoughts on the rest of the field, if you have the time?-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Is there anyone on the "letters" wagon who can sum up the case for me? I seriously don't see it and I'm pretty sure you are all driving a townie lynch wagon, and it's frustrating as hell to repeat myself over again that I've re-read the thread more than once trying to see why people think he's scum and I don't see it. If you're so sure, it shouldn't be hard to do a summation. Convince me he's scum, by explaining the case against him, and I'll do the hammer vote.
Perhaps everyone could do with a re-read. We're like 11 days into this and there's only 252 posts, including the opening mod posts. It's not exactly like it will be all that time consuming.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
@Bitmap - What does "townbled" mean? I think I get it but the next sentence confused me a bit. Do you mean that he mentioned who he thought was town and who to go to, butwithoutreasons? If so, I agree. What someone says after they are locked is wine (if scum) or insight from a confirmed townie, and it's really good to know the thinking behind those "I'm gonna be mislynched, here's my last chance to directly help my wincon" posts.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 242, numberQ wrote:I'll hold off on defending DDD, because I don't like doing that for other players. I will say that I disagree on his lack of game content, though. It may be sparse compared to his IC content, but it's not completely missing like you're saying.
As for Letters, I don't like how obsessed he is with everyone outting their reads all the time. It's like he so desperately wants to be town, and he knows that town is supposed to have reads. His own reads are shaky at best. Also because my gut didn't like how he reacted when reaching L-1.
I've already given my thoughts on the rest of the field, at least the part of the field I'm currently thinking about.
I'm not necessarily sure that "letters" asking for reads is a scum tell, in this particular game. You provide a possible scum motive for him doing so, but it seems just as likely (if not more so) that he's coming back to the thread, seeing that nothing has been said, and is asking people for reads because reads can spark discussion. I generally read posts and try to assume that the person is confscum and see if it makes sense, and then again assuming conftown and see if it makes sense. For me, given the way this game has kind of sputtered along, the request for reads actually reads more town than scum, to me.
You don't provide any reasons why his reads are shaky, so there's nothing really to say there. You've expressed an opinion without any reason to back it up.
Your final reason is a "gut" thing, which there's also nothing for me to respond to. I can't tell you how your gut feels.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 258, Diego1487 wrote:In post 255, Bitmap wrote:Also, letters townbled a bit by the way he reacted on his L-1 vote. He mentioned who to go after after getting lynched with reasons which irks me as town.
Also, Diego has an OMGUS reason on me.
No, my suspicion of you is two-fold: your interaction with letters early on in the game, and how you've ignored, and now try to make a town read, his reaction to reaching L-1.
It feels like you were "coaching" letters early on, telling him to "wrong move, try harder." 154
A player crying out for a lynch of another player who just put him at L-1 is in no way a town move. He hasn't been lynched yet. He's still playing the game. Once a lynch has occurred, twilight cries for a lynch is town. During the game, its just OMGUS. The fact that you're trying to cover this up, and make it look like town, further strengthens my belief that you're his teammate.
That is a really badly reasoned post. You can't make a case against someone based entirely upon the assumption that someone else is also scum. What you're doing is a great way to run headlong into a wall and lose. I'm not saying you shouldn't consider pairings; you should. You should scumhunt people individually, and then consider all possible pairings and whether there are any that make sense. This is a small part of PoE.
Now ... after we string up the first scum, you're obviously at that point always positing a pairing when you are scumhunting. So you are looking for someone who looks independently scummy and also makes sense as a partner for the dead scum, in hindsight.
Judging people based upon a posited pairing is always kind of shaky though, because you really can't know how the scum decide to play and what strategies they used to try and confuse and elude the notice of the town. You can't know until after its all over what motivated the scum or what they did. Some scum pairings just never make sense during the game and are a complete surprise when you get to the end.
All of that said ... if you can make a case against Bitmap without relying upon the assumption that someone else is scum, let's see it. Personally I'm leaning town on Bitmap atm, although the answer to my earlier question may impact that.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I guess I need to be convinced because I have done re-reads and what I've seen isn't something like "letters is scummy because of this post" for reasons more substantial than "gut". His L-1 post reads like townie anger/hurt at being about to be lynched and unable to sway anyone. His flailing looks very townie to me. I dislike that he threw out reads and didn't give any reasons. I haven't pressed him about that because I wanted Bitmap to answer my question(s) first. I don't want me pressing 'letters' to give a "because; reasons" post before I see what Bitmap has to say.
As for being super literal and pressing people ... I've gotten a lot of reactions and responses for pressing people on those things, which is more than I would have to do reads with otherwise given the pacing of this game.
Glad to see you back DDD. You've absolved my main complaint about you, so:
Unvote
I think I will review Ika and Pramitz in ISO.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
@DDD - I think that there's such a thing as "town flailing", especially from newer players who don't know what they should do when being mislynched as town. I've seen at least 3 or 4 mislynches already since I came on site that feature a newer player who is a townie being mislynched and the reaction is a whole lot of flailing as it's happening. They haven't yet learned how to get people to re-evaluate them and they don't know how to help their wincon while they're going down and they panic and you get a bunch of scummy looking posts, and then they flip town.
That post by letters at L-1 screams town at me. It is town enough that I want to re-read the thread (again) and evaluate the people who started and are pushing his lynch even, to see if I can find false notes there.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
LOL. The only reason I put a vote on DDD was because he hadn't posted anything substantive of his own. He had only responded prior to that with acerbic remarks picking apart the thoughts of others. He has since given some substantial thoughts of his own.
I would say that we learn the most from lynching you or "letters". I am almost certain from my re-reading and his L-1 post that he's town, but knowing for certain will allow for us to evaluate the people who pushed the wagon so hard, includingyou.
Of course, your L-1 vote post was pretty darned scummy reading, and you're trying awfully hard to buy town cred at the moment.
I don't think we'll get an Ika or Pram lynch today. I'm not willing to vote for someone I'm nearly convinced is town, so I won't be voting for "letters" outside of some kind of extraordinary circumstance. I do think that after re-reading, of the folks who I think look scummy, this is the most likely one that can gain consensus:
VOTE: Diego-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
@Diego - I'm about as committed to the game as is possible. The L-1 vote on "letters" didn't show up until 5:50 am my time. By that time I had given up on anyone showing up and voting and gone to sleep (I actually went to sleep around 4am after grading some translation homework from my Greek students). I would say doing work that I usually do from the home office or during office hours just to keep myself awake until 4am is dedicated enough, thanks.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 307, ika wrote:cool story bro nice OGMUS
now how about you tell me something better, like if im scum whos my scum buddy?
like who would you kill n1?
like about some actual reads instead of silly acusation?
Yes, you get three for that post.
VOTE: Ika-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
It's a terrible question and you admitted that the most townie motives anyone can think of for the question aren't your reasons. You claim to have some other reason/purpose/motive for asking the question, but at L-1 you are defiantly daring someone to lock you instead of sharing that piece of information. If it's a reasonable and town oriented reason/purpose/motive, then you need to share it and knock the wheels off this wagon.
Since you seem incapable of expressing an actual good reason why you asked the question, my vote stays. If you can pull an actual townie reason out of your backside, I'll gladly re-consider. For now, you look like scum who got too clever and is trying to use aggression to get out of a jam. I think the younger folks would say something like "U mad bro?" at this juncture.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 330, ika wrote:if i give you the damn reason it defest the entire purpous of the question to begin with. if i say my reasons scums can tailor their answer to what i want to hear.
so no i will continue to refuse to give my damn reason and will continue to condone my own lynch. i have a perfectly good reason however i bet when i state my said reason im just going to be riddculed on it and have people call it a shit reason and just wagone me all over again. so no, i will continue to agrro my own lynch and that if i need to selfvote at deadline i fucking will.
tbh at this poitn if it wasnt so anti-town/against wincon i would just sefl hammer out of spite right now just to shove it to all fo you
This is the most terrible post I've ever seen. If you actually flip town, I'll be reporting this post to the mods. One of the rules around here is that you play to your win condition. Right now you are flaunting the fact that you supposedly aren't. You admit that the BS you're spinning right now goes against a town win condition, and then act mad and hurt that we're reading you as scum?
Whatever reason you may have had for asking that question, it isn't going to have its intended purpose now. You might as well just spit it out.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I left out a somewhat amusing anecdote in that last post.
In my first ever forum mafia game, I suicided myself intentionally via post edit. That wasn't even as bad as what ika is claiming he's doing though, because he's trying to antagonize someone else into a suicide-by-proxy situation, in a game where his claimed win condition gets only 2 mislynches. The fact that we went our first day and night without a kill doesn't make it okay for someone on the town win condition to waste 50% of the town's MOE in this way.
At least in my case, it was a game with nearly 30 people and a bunch of mechanics that gave the town a super amount of advantage, and so my n00bshow didn't end up hurting my team.
ika has been around for like 14 months though, so I don't think this is a newbie thing. I'm reading this whole "I'm tempted to just suicide by self vote" BS as a desperate scum post. Flailing at its finest.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
And still he refuses to tell us what his magical purpose was for the question that would have helped him supposedly divine the scum from the town, whilest also refusing to respond to the (now twice explained) point that the only thing that question does is throw a bunch of WINE all over the place and kick up a smokescreen for team scum. There's literally no town motive I can think of for throwing that question into the game and then going after people for not answering it. If the question itself was bait, that would be one thing ... but ika claims that the answers would supposedly be helpful to his wincon, and he's claimed town wincon. So far all of the experienced players in the game who have commented agree that there's not any conceivable town upside to that play that we can think of.
And that doesn't even speak to the awfulness of the rest of the post which contained that question. I did put up three facepalms for a reason.
At this point ika, you are a necessary kill for the town. You otherwise become an easy smokescreen for the scum. If by some miracle you actually had some town motive for that question that none of us can think of, and you share it, I suppose it's possible you drop from "must lynch first priority" to some lower place on the list, but that would have to be one heck of an explanation and someone else would have to look really scummy to supplant you at this point. You lose nothing by giving the explanation. Continued refusal to do so seems very anti-town and just reinforces the scum read.
RE - #339 - ROFL. Another for you. If you actually are town aligned you brought this on yourself, and your continued hostility and refusal to even try and dig yourself out of it means this isall your fault. You don't get to gloat or say anything to anyone. You dug your own grave, and seeing as you haven't explained yourself, not even a little bit, don't be talking about "told you so" or any other BS. You haven't even claimed yet, strictly speaking. What exactly did you tell us? Oh ... that's right. Nothing.
Here's another, because right now you have earned so many I can't possibly post enough of them:-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
There's no town value to me answering that question. You claim there is some town value, but apparently the only value it has is you can harangue people who don't want to kick up a smokescreen and spill wine all over the place and OMGUS us for being intelligent enough to call you on your bullshit.
But I'll make you a deal, since I'm reasonable: You tell us what you had in mind that has town value behind asking that question, and I'll answer it. I've been playing forum mafia for something ~5 years, and live mafia going back to when I was 13 or so, and I've been scum plenty of times. I'll even give you the first part of the answer you'll get when you stop throwing shit all over the wall like a rabid monkey and actually post something useful: Scum had two general paths available to them last night in terms of narrowing down their kill choice. Tell me how it helps the town, and I'll tell you what I would have done if I had been assigned to team scum this game. Doesn't get much more reasonable than that.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
RE = #342 - That might be your most anti-town statement yet. No town player wants to see a hammer before everyone in the game has even posted, let alone before any significant posts have come from everyone, especially in a game with some pretty heavily inactive players. That last line is perhaps the scummiest post I've ever seen. Are you like trying to see how scummy looking you can be or something? Are we on candid camera or something?-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
I promised I'd answer, no matter how strange your reason was. Last night the scum team would have had two main pools to choose from: active players and inactive players. The safest scum play last night would probably have been to kill an inactive with no real content in the thread so that the kill wouldn't leave any clues behind. Given the lack of a death, there are a few possibilities in play:
1.) Team Scum submitted no night kill. If they have a roleblocker and know that they are either dealing with a doctor+copora jailkeeper and 1-shot Bulletproof, this might be a decent play, although I wouldn't consider it optimal. It could greatly benefit them if there's a jailer who blocked a townie and assumes he stopped the kill or if a doctor saved a scum and assumes he saved the target. Basically this move would be a long con of sorts, and gets the added slight bonus of avoiding a MYLO situation after 2 mislynches vs. the more desirable (for scum) LYLO situation(s) at 2v3 and if it extends another day at 1v2. I'm fairly certain the downside (which I address at end of post) outweighs any benefit I can think of.
2.) They hit a 1-shot bulletproof.
3.) A jailer blocked the kill submitter.
4.) A doctor made a save.
Presuming that scum team has a roleblocker and knows it's 50/50 on having a doc, then if I were in their shoes I'd have gone after someone inactive and low profile. I don't think there was enough in the thread from day 1 to pull a frame job with the kill last night. I also didn't see anyone who posted things that screamed PR either, and usually I'm pretty good at spotting them since it is a considerable help to all win conditions to identify PRs. Scum wants to kill them and town wants to realize who they are for PoE and possibly to set up a self sacrifice situation (tossing out false breadcrumbs for the scum to find and assume you are a PR when you're not).
If the scum team doesn't have a roleblocker, then I would have likely combed the thread again looking for PRs first and if I didn't have reasonable certainty that I had found one, I'd have looked to make a kill that would provide confusion and cover. I don't agree with the IC being the most optimal first kill choice. If the IC is driving the game and looking super townie, then maybe I would consider it, but even then, I would have to assume a possible doc save is gonna be aimed at the IC more times than not, which would likely shift my thinking to other people.
So there you go ika: a very thorough explanation, complete with the basic thought process I use as scum. Feel free to check out my first game on site in which I replaced into a scum slot and those factors are precisely what I was talking with my partner about on night one. I tried to logic out who a doctor would save and narrow the lynch targets down to players who had given off possible PR tells. As it happens, we got the cop with that night 1 kill, and he had investigated someone who we took advantage of for a mislynch. If he had lived, that person may have been spared and we may have lost.
And that's the downside to a scum team going with a deliberate no kill night, which is why it seems the unlikeliest explanation for what happened last night. PRs win the game for town frequently, especially cops. It would take exceptionally odd circumstances I think for a scum team to withhold a kill in newbie matrix game and give up a night trying to eliminate the biggest threat(s).-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
Well ika, if I were scum and my partner and I agreed we should kill a lurker, I would have re-read the thread and figured out which one would give the absolute least possible information to the town. This is the problem with your question. You're asking all of us to say who we would have put a kill out on, but there's no useful information to be gleaned from it. If all of us (including you) gave a name and reasons, then that's 9 smokescreens for the scum to use. The kill this coming night phase will be worthless on the information front if everyone answers your question with the specificity you are demanding.
I answered the underlying question behind the question you actually asked. I gave you my scum thought process and took the time to think like scum. Unfortunately that's wasted effort at this point. Trying to figure out what scum are thinking is a pointless exercise without a kill to give any bounds to possible motive. At this point, one could posit any conceivable possibility and there's nothing to support or reject such suppositions. After there's a kill is the proper time to try and get townies to think like scum and try and figure out the likely motives for the kill and then from there postulate the most likely killer(s) to fit the victim and likely motives.
And even then, it's only a somewhat useful because it assumes the scum are acting rationally and didn't just randomize their kill. Any unorthodox scum motivation defeats it and any frame job defeats it, because a frame job is by definition completely WiFoM. There's no way to know, without a genuine cop claim, whether the person is being framed or whether they are scum and did the kill to make it look like they're being framed.
So ... in the end ... your question simply helps scum and has no utility to the town. I ask you again to explain the utility value to the town.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
No town player should give a specific answer to that question. The only utility value derived from answers to that question belongs firmly to scum. Your thinking is so brutally awful right now it's unbelievable. Scum are the most likely people to just answer your question because they know it's not helpful to town. You are pushing people to help the scum wincon, and thencalling them scumwhen they are smart enough to realize that doing as you ask has zero benefit for town. I've seen some awful mafia play, but what you're doing right now takes the cake for worst play ever. I can't decide if the play would be worse if you are scum or worse if you are town. It's really super bad either way though.
As far as I'm concerned, you're the lynch today, but not until some of these inactive people get off their backsides and contribute to the game.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
You are playing literally the worst mafia game I've ever seen anyone play, no matter what your actual alignment is. Yes, you're a policy lynch now.
If I had answered your question, it would have had zero utility for the town and at least some utility for the scum team. If more than one of us had been dumb enough to answer your question, it would have had a distinct negative utility for the town and a probable game winning utility for the scum. Scum teams dream of someone doing something so stupid as you did (and continue to do) with that question.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
@ika - By the way, you had a really simple defense open to you, which was only prevented by your pride. You could simply have admitted that you didn't have some clever reason or plan behind the question and that you threw it up on a whim with some nebulous idea that maybe scum might trip on it. Town is much more likely to post on impulse without thinking everything through and making sure everything adds up. Scum are generally more cautious and don't post on a whim. They re-read things and make sure that what they're posting fits and is consistent with the idea of a town player they are attempting to project into the game.
Had you simply said something like "You know what, I didn't really think that question through. The only real thought I had was maybe scum might trip on it." or something like that, swallowed your pride and admitted it was a bad question with no town value ... the pressure probably drops (at least from me, and I suspect from others). Instead, you doubled down with this insistence that you had some clearly reasoned purpose to the question which would be ruined if you shared it. Since your "reason" was an incomprehensible mess of a post, I think we all know that wasn't true. So you doubled down on a bad play and got snotty about it to boot.
The ball is in your court. You've soft claimed town win condition. You haven't made an outright claim of anything. If you actually are town, please consider that three of the four people who could hammer you are significantly inactive this day phase. It would be of fairly high value to the town for you to swallow your pride and for us to avoid mislynch (presuming you are what you claim to be). Obviously it's too late for you to use the out that you had open to you before you dug in and made the situation worse, but I have faith that an experienced player who is legitimately town can figure out a way off the ledge.
I'll be around whilest I work in the office today, refreshing occasionally.
@Bitmap, @Pramitz, @Zombiekitty - We've had a no kill night already. It would be super nice if we didn't squander that opportunity. It would be really nice if you guys made some significant contribution sooner than later. Thanks in advance.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 361, numberQ wrote:Wow Drixx, you're really laying into him. While I mostly agree with a lot of what you say, it's just a game man. You've made your point.
That last post was meant to inspire him to re-evaluate what he's doing. If he really is town and he continues to respond the way he is, do you think he makes it out of today alive? If; however, he's town and changes his approach from "I dare you!" to something convincingly townie, then he can help his win condition and avoid using up a mislynch.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 364, zombiekitty wrote:@Drixx what really is your read on ika right now? Because on your post 360, I'm getting this sense that you really do believe he's town and just wants him to admit to his mistake(?). It's not actually you reading him as scum.
Im kind of reading the posts backwards, so will be back later until I finish reading up the rest of the posts and find out why people are suddenly voting for ika.
Im also kind of turned off about the fact it's like day 1 all over again and no flips or kills for information.
Nothing has changed my read on ika. 360 is directed at ika completely on what seems like a very remote off chance that he's actually town. Every response he's given has been scummy. If he actually is town (he soft claimed town win condition), then he needs to take a different approach than the one he's currently taking, which seems like an awful lot of nonsense and third grade spiteful tantrum. Only scum or someone being spiteful would take the stance ika has. No matter what ika's alignment is, his response doesn't help him. If he's scum then he should have done something similar to what I pointed out in 360. If he's town, he should also have done something similar to that. His play makes no sense for any alignment in a newbie game setup. The only role I can think of which would make his posts/actions this day phase make any sense would be Village Idiot, and that's not on the table.
He has basically said, and I'm paraphrasing here, "I'm town and you are all stupid for not understanding my play and I am not going to explain or defend myself in any rational way. Instead, I'm going to instigate my own lynch so I can harm you for daring to vote for me when I look totally scummy because that hurts my feelings and I want to say 'I told you so' after the game." So long as he continues to behave the way he has, he's a policy lynch.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 367, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:In post 365, Drixx wrote:If he actually is town (he soft claimed town win condition)
Why is this a thing that needs to be mentioned? Do you think there's anyone who wouldn't do that under pressure?
For clarity in terms of what I'm saying. I'm not trying to defend ika in any way. I do want to see him play to his win condition, whatever that is. Right now his play is terribad no matter which alignment he actually is.
In post 372, ika wrote:also if drixx was paying attento to me he would already know my role
This is your play? You're going to imply that you bread-crumbed your role in the thread and all of us missed it?-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 398, ika wrote:wow this game s fuckign slow now.....
i also now have xombie as solid town and know his role
Invoking Lynch All Liars on top of the case against ika. There's no breadcrumbs pointing to a role in #397, and this constant BS about knowing roles is exactly that: BS.-
-
Drixx Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7210
- Joined: December 17, 2014
In post 400, ika wrote:397?
i claimed bro, keep trying. if you still don't find it i can show you post-game
In 398 you responded to zombie's post by saying it caused you to both read him as town andknowhis role. There's nothing in his post (#397) that even hints at a role. You've now posited PRs for more people than there can possibly be PRs for, and claimed to know the "role" of what ... 4 people?