In post 412, Something_Smart wrote:What if four people told you the same thing? One of them must be town, at least.
(Conveniently, he has four Team Mafia teammates in this game...)
Sorry, but I was one of those teammates and I don't see his meta the same way he and Mathdino do. I've never viewed him as a lynchbaity player until he said he was one and I played with him a handful of times before that. I feel like I've had no trouble townreading him in the past. I'd have to go back and look to see if that's accurate, but that's how I've remembered him.
{quote="BuJaber"]That may be true but I'm pretty sure I've used it myself before as town.[/quote]
pops wrote:This reads as really bad survivor tell. S_S isn't even voting him. BuJabertown would care about arguing why it is valid to or logically justified to do so, not care about arguing it isn't logic he only employs when he rolls scum... which no one even said...
VOTE: BuJaber
Not only that, but the fact that he goes to being pretty sure he did it as town before rather than knowing he did it as town just now is kinda ugly. I've been townreading BuJaber a bit, but I don't care too much for that post.
Dave wrote:Someone explicitly townread Agent Sparkles, not sure why.
Me.
Something Smart wrote:Scum do not have survival as part of their wincon any more than town do.
Something Smart wrote:Therefore yes it's survivalistic but that's not scummy.
I don't want to go too deep into theory, but I disagree. Town have much larger numbers and a certain number are expected to die throughout a game, especially via NK. It's arguably beneficial to your team if you are a VT and get NK'd instead of a power role. Scum have smaller numbers and need to focus on not getting lynched, therefore surviving. Scum also don't have to try to catch scum, obviously. So that's an added goal that town has where scum's entire motivation is don't get lynched. Even if you don't agree with me, it's enough of a perception that it's what most people act on. Survivalistic play IS scummy. I get that it benefits town to look town and I do actively try to look town as both alignments myself, but that's an art most people haven't mastered. If I see someone being survivalistic, I usually associate that with scum.
verydark wrote:I do think the pops vs Bujaber conflict in #415 feels weird, I thought it might be SvS
I'm actually shocked by this.
BuJaber wrote:Hard to say for sure because pops and gamma sort of soft-defended him and the rest defended him based on meta. For now I'll assume Dave is town and watch the other 4.
I assume by "the other 4" you mean the Serious Business players? Because if so, I want you to show me where I defended dave on meta.
Mathdino wrote:I'm good with basically policy lynching a lurker if this is how it's gonna be. Letting this game sputter out when it hits 5p or 3p is not my cup of tea.
I wouldn't be too upset if it was Mylo if not for the fact that I don't really want to let verydark live.
Lil wrote:Who are the new kids? Why is LAMIST alignment indicative?
Anyone new enough to use that phrase as if it's been around forever. His post gave off a vibe like he was trying to make sure we all could see that his intent is to go "get the scum" and that he can't be scum himself. He's done a lot scummier stuff since then though so I'd rather focus on that than on what caught my attention in his first post.
Lil wrote:This also reads pretty genuine.
What is genuine about playing the newbie card in the way that verydark did there? He basically asked for a do-over because his attempt to stop his wagon with AtE didn't work.
Lil wrote:The timing of his self-vote doesn’t read alignment indicative to me. A self-vote is usually aim to convey that one is checking out and giving up. There’s no motivation to do that as either alignment.
I also personally believe scum in his position are more likely to wait for a chance self-hammer than put themselves in self-hammer range.
He straight up told us his motivation was to AtE us into unvoting him.
Lil wrote:I don’t. What’s the scum motivation for him not doing anything?
Dave wrote:
Scum motivation would be to wait until there is a good town wagon going to chime in?
Or the fact that some players are scared of being scum because they think they are going to say something dumb and get lynched so they stay quiet instead. Not sure if Mylo is that kind of player or not though.
Mylo wrote:I'm finally back, apologies for being completely absent so far.
I'm liking LUV, MathDitto, dave and Gamma, they all seem town-motivated and actually interesting in finding scum.
Not sure what I feel about Pop and verydark, they both have townish actions but they both seem distant in actually trying to discover scum in this game.
Pretty much everyone else left no notable impression on me so far.
So...who is scum then?
Pop wrote:Even if you can't figure out that as SK your survival has a 1:1 correlation with your victory, and as town it's 1/15, and scum is naturally between, at the very least town is both trying to survive and trying to find scum, and scum is trying to survive and not doing anything else, so it should be obvious that a focus on surviving tilts that way.
Yes! This! Definitely this! This is the theory point I was trying to make above.
______________
I'm through post 505. I plan on finishing this tonight.