No.In post 6, furtiveglance wrote:so we get 2 eliminations today. That's interesting. How about anyone who leads on town gets quickhammered afterwards?
For scum, the odds of avoiding two wagons is hard. We can drive two people up and the choices made will be extremely useful in the future. That's the whole point of VCA.
Flea, how do you know by now that's strictly untrue? People react and still push wagons for reasons. I'm not advocating that we vote randomly. Instead, I'm suggesting we don't resist a popular wagon we're ok with for a shiny new thing.In post 20, Flea The Magician wrote:Mean we just vote until something sticks and we start getting info, quick way out of RVS really but leaves us directionless
It's my understanding the BP can never die by nightkill.In post 107, Dunnstral wrote:Not using the double elim lets the mafia shoot at the imprisoned person twice and bring the game to evens, which we then can't fix. So at the end we end up with 4 person alive and the clear is deadIn post 85, Radical Rat wrote:I don't understand what you mean here. The only situation in which they would shoot the same slot twice is if we used Imprison, and they didn't change their minds on the kill the next night. But I don't see what double eliminating today has to do with that.In post 54, Dunnstral wrote:This also stops mafia from shooting at the informed player twice later with no consequence.
Town can have a difference of opinion. Scum will jump on it.In post 136, furtiveglance wrote:From Titus, 93 is really bizarre. Calling Flea scum for strategic difference of opinion is a massive leap, then voting for me just because I'm the one vote going. Seems really bloodthirsty
I'm feeling ill. What I've skimmed, I see nothing but campaigning to throw.In post 139, Flea The Magician wrote:Titus do you have any investment in this game? I'm getting the vibe you're dodging me.In post 138, Titus wrote:Town can have a difference of opinion. Scum will jump on it.In post 136, furtiveglance wrote:From Titus, 93 is really bizarre. Calling Flea scum for strategic difference of opinion is a massive leap, then voting for me just because I'm the one vote going. Seems really bloodthirsty
Fairish but it's hard to be a presence with no one talking.In post 141, Flea The Magician wrote:Hope you're better soon <3 Gives me the heebies when you're not more of a presence in games
That's because he doesn't want something. He wants the game to stagnate and have no information.In post 172, Dunnstral wrote:Acting like the only choices are you or no eliminate is disingenuous
This feels a bit town. I don’t like the hedge but the rationale on the back end is town.In post 257, Alianna wrote:I'd naturally be suspicious of the people involved in the conflict, but maybe the mafia are hiding in the shadows and watching us eat ourselves. I have no idea who it is right now.
This feels like an attempt to force through a bad idea without giving reads.In post 251, Cat.Jpeg wrote:I don't think we will get a turn around and an elimination today, I think its best if someone hammers so we can stop talking about if we should double eliminate or if something was a joke or not and get onto more helpful things.In post 247, Alianna wrote:We aren't going to get a good wagon in the time we have. I think it's best we just end the phase so we can move on from this argument and discuss reads.
Like I said. Town can disagree. Scum jump on the opportunity to silence town and deny information.In post 236, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm the main one pushing her no kill.
Titus needs to give her reasoning for the furtive vote an why not me when I'm clearly being called scum in that post as the main person pushing for no kill.
In post 260, Titus wrote:Like I said. Town can disagree. Scum jump on the opportunity to silence town and deny information.In post 236, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm the main one pushing her no kill.
Titus needs to give her reasoning for the furtive vote an why not me when I'm clearly being called scum in that post as the main person pushing for no kill.
In post 261, furtiveglance wrote:I've encouraged discussion, I was the first one to give actual reads and ask others for opinions.
130 is literally an omgus.
Then where was the effort by anyone to hunt? Why was it like pulling teeth?In post 266, GoldfishFromTheMoon wrote:You keep talking about scum trying to deny information, but I don't think that's the case here. By giving us the kill action today, I think scum beleived they could steer the game towards two miseliminations on day 1 which is good for them. So I think scum would actually want to go ahead with the second elimination unless the wagons were on them and it looked likely to be a scum elim.In post 260, Titus wrote:Like I said. Town can disagree. Scum jump on the opportunity to silence town and deny information.In post 236, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm the main one pushing her no kill.
Titus needs to give her reasoning for the furtive vote an why not me when I'm clearly being called scum in that post as the main person pushing for no kill.
Right. A is keeping their options open.In post 303, Dunnstral wrote:In post 299, Alianna wrote:Though I think both Titus and furtive are sus, I think it’s unlikely they’re the team.
I'm grumpy anxious and stressed.In post 314, Flea The Magician wrote:Titus are you OK? Like genuinely asking
No town would have their position. SR on me sure. SR on furtiveglance ok. There's no way anyone believes SS so a defense turns into not a team but individual, which is an excuse to try and keep the game static.In post 351, Dunnstral wrote:But you originally called them scum because they had you both as scum together. But they don't, and now you're saying they're keeping their options open instead.In post 327, Titus wrote:Right. A is keeping their options open.In post 303, Dunnstral wrote:In post 299, Alianna wrote:Though I think both Titus and furtive are sus, I think it’s unlikely they’re the team.
How are their reads different from town who is giving a reads list?
Why? Your last readwall had them at null and this post suggest you have them near obvscum?In post 364, Alianna wrote:I definitely don't townread them.In post 361, furtiveglance wrote:Consensus scumread appears to be Cat.Jpeg at the moment. I think Alianna is town
Scum!Dunn struggles with content and I saw you elsewhere.
Lol.In post 397, Radical Rat wrote:Sorry, I've had a lot happening past couple days, didn't find the energy to engage here.
At any rate, I have to agree that Titus looks bad here. Alianna push/vote was questionable, but I was willing to take it as just being wrong, moving on to Dunnstral with a similarly bad/reachy push after no one bit on Alianna though... I think that tips the scale a bit too far.
Probably all town ftrIn post 400, Cat.Jpeg wrote:me, RR, and furtive in a triangle, nice
It's not against the rules to call people dumb.In post 405, Flea The Magician wrote:Titus wtaf. Genuinely worried about you now cause you are not the person who goes "Well I wanna sub out but its strategic ss lol!" normally because you know thats not only against rules but its a shit move. It now also confirms my SR on you here.