We should all read my Carbon game for gamebreaking strategies. Anyway, I don't trust TeChNoWC to be town and lead us in a game-break yet. I think it's a lot more likely that he's
DUN DUN DUUUUUN.
In post 31, Om of the Nom wrote:I would personally constitue breaking as "finding a strategy to make it almost an assured win."Now of course there are times when that's impossible to avoid, but that's fine since it's unavoidable.I really don't want anything like that to happen willingly, as to me it'd ruin the fun of the game.
Hypoclaiming is fine, as it's just a way to get the most out of night actions.
In post 40, Om of the Nom wrote:Well I'm just curious why he only mentioned a Seer and not a Cop.
Methinks he could be part of teh Warewoofs.
In post 49, TeChNoWC wrote:unvote
ITS FOUR TO LYNCH GUYS dont forget.
scum points go to whiskers for not claiming L-1
In post 57, Om of the Nom wrote:Techno, put Gunny back at L-1.
Gunny shouldn't claim though.
Anyone who hammers him prematurely will get a severe yelling from me and is probably scum.
Not to mention that I wanted to do the same thing.In post 66, Om of the Nom wrote:In post 64, drmyshotgun wrote:Also lol at how he slipped refusing to participate in breaking the mechanics.
How is it a slip when I actually want to play the game?
Yeah but look. If you tell everypony "DON'T HAMMER" then why will there be any reactions at all? Especially emotional, telling ones? He'll either hold his breath until the wagon is off, or he'll think about it for a second and plant towntells.In post 61, Om of the Nom wrote:Naw bro, you aren't town at all this game.
Like seriously, I'm getting scumvibes from you right now.
Like in Mini 1332.
PEDIT: Whiskers, you must be new here.
If Gunny's at L-1, it will produce reactions from him. I deliberately left that out so that it would be somewhat more effective, but now that I have to say this it probably nullifies this
(okay, so it's Mustache Man, but I tried.)TeChNoWC wrote:You got scumvibes from me in 418 and I WAS MASON
youll soon see how town i am, if you havent already.
gut guy cannot beat meta man because meta man is different every game
In post 90, TeChNoWC wrote:aww guys let me slow the game a little, u all didnt want an instawin and now im having fun...
ARE ALL THREE OF U SCUM??
In post 105, TeChNoWC wrote:urgh that came out wrong.
player a and player b are masons who know each other is town but they call each other scum on the thread. Thats townbussing
No, wrong: no one wants lynches so quickly into D1 except scum. L-1 wagons are perfectly fine.In post 121, TeChNoWC wrote:In post 110, Whiskers wrote:Since an L-1 wagon is technically what we want, It doesn't make a whole lot of sense why you'd jump off of it like it was on fire.
This is silly. No one wants L-1 wagons so quickly into D1 except scum. I jumped on the drmy wagon for content like any sane person should have at that point in time, not for quicklynching.
You're not getting it-- I was saying those things from the standpoint that you were scum. There really isn't any way I could have known or proven that you were scum, so I was just acting like you were scum, and explaining your actions as though you were scum.In post 121, TeChNoWC wrote:In post 110, Whiskers wrote:but if Iassumeyou're scum, and that you have scum motives, those are the explanations for your behaviour.
You just false dilemma'd. So I'm not scum for those reasons at all, but if I AM scum then these would be the reasons behind what I did. Uh DERRRRRRRRRR.
Again, on the ASSUMPTION. But you have no reason to make that assumption and the reasons you are providing are hypotheticals to the extension of the assumption, not factors that lead to the assumption itself. Provide one good reason why you should assume I am scum.
However, I actually legitimately don't understand why this. No matter what you thought of him before, this is scummy and should be voted for.In post 121, TeChNoWC wrote:Also it's some intense fishing, like fucking whale fishing. And that's illegal bro.
How about follow my plan now you trust me, rather than this estupido one?
In post 121, TeChNoWC wrote:In post 120, Whiskers wrote:See, techno, this is what I was talking about when I said scum could try to lead town in a gamebreaking strategy that really only led it into a loss. If shotty had confused a few more townies into thinking we had any confirmed town players, they'd have the PRs right in their hooves. Nightkill, nightkill, then it's like, 3/2, right?
Paranoia without assessing the validity of a plan is just plain paranoia and stupid and scummy.
1. Drmy's plan is horribly bad and dumb. Don't do it.
2. My plan could work, and no one has bothered to weigh in on it. Could work.
The source doesn't matter. You examine the text, and you'll find out the true nature of the source.
In post 132, drmyshotgun wrote:I'm not trolling. Dunno why you don't like me calling you and TeCh conf-Towns.
Yeah I wanted to break this game myself.
The rules don't say anything about No Lynching. So we can just No Lynch or reach the deadline without any votes.
But what's the point on saying it after people were told off by the Mod?
Sorry if I was "whaling". I'm not sure why that doesn't work for you guys.
Whiskers is Town. Om is just having a weird opinion on her. Another indication that Om is scumfuck.
TeCh is Town. As I've said. About a gazillion times. No fucking way a Mod will react like Maestro did had TeCh been Scum.
Since breaking the game is only advantageous to Town and guarantees their (almost) certain-win, had TeCh been Scum trying to do that, Maestro would have known that it's the Scums that are participating in the game-breakage thus leading to the conclusion that TeChdoeshave another plan.
Yet TeCh was Town. Mod knew this. Of course he does.
Thus TeCh's sole purpose of breaking the game was for Town victory which is already seemingly possible.
I don't need to use people's words or actions to get a Townread.
Most surefire Town read comes from the Moderator confirming a Town for us.